These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28485959)

  • 1. Evaluation of Different Methods for Identification of Structural Alerts Using Chemical Ames Mutagenicity Data Set as a Benchmark.
    Yang H; Li J; Wu Z; Li W; Liu G; Tang Y
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2017 Jun; 30(6):1355-1364. PubMed ID: 28485959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computational derivation of structural alerts from large toxicology data sets.
    Ahlberg E; Carlsson L; Boyer S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2945-52. PubMed ID: 25275755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of Nontoxic Substructures: A New Strategy to Avoid Potential Toxicity Risk.
    Yang H; Sun L; Li W; Liu G; Tang Y
    Toxicol Sci; 2018 Oct; 165(2):396-407. PubMed ID: 29893961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benchmark data set for in silico prediction of Ames mutagenicity.
    Hansen K; Mika S; Schroeter T; Sutter A; ter Laak A; Steger-Hartmann T; Heinrich N; Müller KR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Sep; 49(9):2077-81. PubMed ID: 19702240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fragment Prioritization on a Large Mutagenicity Dataset.
    Floris M; Raitano G; Medda R; Benfenati E
    Mol Inform; 2017 Jul; 36(7):. PubMed ID: 28032691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In silico prediction of chemical Ames mutagenicity.
    Xu C; Cheng F; Chen L; Du Z; Li W; Liu G; Lee PW; Tang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Nov; 52(11):2840-7. PubMed ID: 23030379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of the structural requirements for mutagencitiy, by incorporating molecular flexibility and metabolic activation of chemicals. II. General Ames mutagenicity model.
    Serafimova R; Todorov M; Pavlov T; Kotov S; Jacob E; Aptula A; Mekenyan O
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2007 Apr; 20(4):662-76. PubMed ID: 17381132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computing similarity between structural environments of mutagenicity alerts.
    Chakravarti SK; Saiakhov RD
    Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 30346583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Augmenting Expert Knowledge-Based Toxicity Alerts by Statistically Mined Molecular Fragments.
    Chakravarti S
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 Jun; 36(6):848-858. PubMed ID: 37207298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Merging applicability domains for in silico assessment of chemical mutagenicity.
    Liu R; Wallqvist A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Mar; 54(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 24494696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of new structural alerts suitable for chemical category formation for assigning covalent and non-covalent mechanisms relevant to DNA binding.
    Enoch SJ; Cronin MT
    Mutat Res; 2012 Mar; 743(1-2):10-9. PubMed ID: 22260876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing predictive performance of CASE Ultra expert system models using the applicability domains of individual toxicity alerts.
    Chakravarti SK; Saiakhov RD; Klopman G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2609-18. PubMed ID: 22947043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utility of published DNA reactivity alerts.
    Myden A; Guesne SJ; Cayley A; Williams RV
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 88():77-86. PubMed ID: 28549899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of 11 in silico models for the prediction of small molecule mutagenicity: role of steric hindrance and electron-withdrawing groups.
    Ford KA; Ryslik G; Chan BK; Lewin-Koh SC; Almeida D; Stokes M; Gomez SR
    Toxicol Mech Methods; 2017 Jan; 27(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 27813437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transitioning to composite bacterial mutagenicity models in ICH M7 (Q)SAR analyses.
    Landry C; Kim MT; Kruhlak NL; Cross KP; Saiakhov R; Chakravarti S; Stavitskaya L
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Dec; 109():104488. PubMed ID: 31586682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mutagenic potential and structural alerts of phytotoxins.
    Bassan A; Pavan M; Lo Piparo E
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2023 Mar; 173():113562. PubMed ID: 36563927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Topological structural alerts modulations of mammalian cell mutagenicity for halogenated derivatives.
    Pérez-Garrido A; Girón-Rodríguez F; Morales Helguera A; Borges F; Combes RD
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2014; 25(1):17-33. PubMed ID: 24283490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identifying the structural requirements for chromosomal aberration by incorporating molecular flexibility and metabolic activation of chemicals.
    Mekenyan O; Todorov M; Serafimova R; Stoeva S; Aptula A; Finking R; Jacob E
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2007 Dec; 20(12):1927-41. PubMed ID: 18052113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extrapolation of in vitro structural alerts for mutagenicity to the in vivo endpoint.
    Tennant RE; Guesné SJ; Canipa S; Cayley A; Drewe WC; Honma M; Masumura K; Morita T; Stalford SA; Williams RV
    Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):111-121. PubMed ID: 30281100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative evaluation of in silico systems for ames test mutagenicity prediction: scope and limitations.
    Hillebrecht A; Muster W; Brigo A; Kansy M; Weiser T; Singer T
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 Jun; 24(6):843-54. PubMed ID: 21534561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.