These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28487270)

  • 1. The research progress of genomic selection in livestock.
    Li HW; Wang RJ; Wang ZY; Li XW; Wang ZY; Yanjun Z; Rui S; Zhihong L; Jinquan L
    Yi Chuan; 2017 May; 39(5):377-387. PubMed ID: 28487270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture.
    Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of alternative random regression and reaction norm models for whole genome predictions.
    Yang W; Chen C; Steibel JP; Ernst CW; Bates RO; Zhou L; Tempelman RJ
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2678-92. PubMed ID: 26115256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genome-wide association and genomic selection in animal breeding.
    Hayes B; Goddard M
    Genome; 2010 Nov; 53(11):876-83. PubMed ID: 21076503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genotyping strategies of selection candidates in livestock breeding programmes.
    Granleese T; Clark SA; van der Werf JHJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Mar; 136(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 30690805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experiences with a single-step genome evaluation.
    Misztal I; Aggrey SE; Muir WM
    Poult Sci; 2013 Sep; 92(9):2530-4. PubMed ID: 23960138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The future of livestock breeding: genomic selection for efficiency, reduced emissions intensity, and adaptation.
    Hayes BJ; Lewin HA; Goddard ME
    Trends Genet; 2013 Apr; 29(4):206-14. PubMed ID: 23261029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short communication: Genomic selection using a multi-breed, across-country reference population.
    Pryce JE; Gredler B; Bolormaa S; Bowman PJ; Egger-Danner C; Fuerst C; Emmerling R; Sölkner J; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 May; 94(5):2625-30. PubMed ID: 21524555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accelerating improvement of livestock with genomic selection.
    Meuwissen T; Hayes B; Goddard M
    Annu Rev Anim Biosci; 2013 Jan; 1():221-37. PubMed ID: 25387018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Progress and future perspectives of livestock genomics in India: a mini review.
    Saravanan KA; Panigrahi M; Kumar H; Nayak SS; Rajawat D; Bhushan B; Dutt T
    Anim Biotechnol; 2023 Nov; 34(6):1979-1987. PubMed ID: 35369840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of genome editing on the introduction of monogenic traits in livestock.
    Bastiaansen JWM; Bovenhuis H; Groenen MAM; Megens HJ; Mulder HA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Apr; 50(1):18. PubMed ID: 29661133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of genomic prediction for milk production traits in the Chinese Holstein population using a reference population consisting of cows.
    Ding X; Zhang Z; Li X; Wang S; Wu X; Sun D; Yu Y; Liu J; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Zhang S; Zhang Y; Zhang Q
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Aug; 96(8):5315-23. PubMed ID: 23746588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An efficient exact method to obtain GBLUP and single-step GBLUP when the genomic relationship matrix is singular.
    Fernando RL; Cheng H; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Oct; 48(1):80. PubMed ID: 27788669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Invited review: efficient computation strategies in genomic selection.
    Misztal I; Legarra A
    Animal; 2017 May; 11(5):731-736. PubMed ID: 27869042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of female information in dairy cattle genomic breeding programs.
    Mc Hugh N; Meuwissen TH; Cromie AR; Sonesson AK
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4109-18. PubMed ID: 21787946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of QTL properties on the accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Calus MP; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 May; 47(1):42. PubMed ID: 25951906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genomic selection in livestock populations.
    Goddard ME; Hayes BJ; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Res (Camb); 2010 Dec; 92(5-6):413-21. PubMed ID: 21429272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
    Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.