328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28488178)
1. A prospective randomized study of the use of an ultrathin colonoscope versus a pediatric colonoscope in sedation-optional colonoscopy.
Sato K; Ito S; Kitagawa T; Hirahata K; Hihara D; Tominaga K; Yasuda I; Maetani I
Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5150-5158. PubMed ID: 28488178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Propofol sedation for colonoscopy with a new ultrathin or a standard endoscope: a prospective randomized controlled study.
Töx U; Schumacher B; Toermer T; Terheggen G; Mertens J; Holzapfel B; Lehmacher W; Goeser T; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2013 Jun; 45(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 23468196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrathin versus pediatric instruments for colonoscopy in older female patients: A randomized trial.
Nemoto D; Utano K; Endo S; Isohata N; Hewett DG; Togashi K
Dig Endosc; 2017 Mar; 29(2):168-174. PubMed ID: 27859645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis of the performance of ultrathin vs. standard colonoscopes.
Sofi AA; Nawras A; Khan MA; Howden CW; Lee WM
Endoscopy; 2017 Apr; 49(4):351-358. PubMed ID: 27852099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of discomfort during colonoscopy with conventional and ultrathin colonoscopes in ulcerative colitis patients.
Ogawa T; Ohda Y; Nagase K; Kono T; Tozawa K; Tomita T; Iimuro M; Hida N; Oshima T; Fukui H; Hori K; Watari J; Nakamura S; Miwa H
Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 24995962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized comparison of ultrathin and standard colonoscope in cecal intubation rate and patient tolerance.
Luo DJ; Hui AJ; Yan KK; Ng SC; Wong VW; Chan FK; Cheong JP; Lam PP; Tse YK; Lau JY
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):484-90. PubMed ID: 21963069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope decreases the dose of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison of 3 colonoscopes.
Lee DW; Li AC; Ko CW; Chu DW; Chan KC; Poon CM; Sin KS; Leung KF; Sze TS; Chan AC; Chung SC
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Mar; 65(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 17321243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial.
Garborg KK; Løberg M; Matre J; Holme O; Kalager M; Hoff G; Bretthauer M
Endoscopy; 2012 Aug; 44(8):740-6. PubMed ID: 22622786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective randomized study on the benefits of a new small-caliber colonoscope.
Sato K; Ito S; Shigiyama F; Kitagawa T; Hirahata K; Tominaga K; Maetani I
Endoscopy; 2012 Aug; 44(8):746-53. PubMed ID: 22833021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intermediate-length colonoscope needs more training duration than long-length colonoscope.
Kim YG; Kim KJ; Yang DH; Ye BD; Byeon JS; Myung SJ; Yang SK; Kim JH
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):1007-13. PubMed ID: 24957569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for routine colonoscopy in women who have undergone hysterectomy.
Marshall JB; Perez RA; Madsen RW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jun; 55(7):838-41. PubMed ID: 12024137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrathin colonoscope with a diameter of 9.8 mm for total colonoscopy.
Okamoto M; Kawabe T; Kato J; Yamaji Y; Ikenoue T; Omata M
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2005 Sep; 39(8):679-83. PubMed ID: 16082276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long pediatric colonoscope versus intermediate length adult colonoscope for colonoscopy.
Hsieh YH; Zhou AL; Lin HJ
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 2):e7-e10. PubMed ID: 18702687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Carbon dioxide insufflation does not reduce pain scores during colonoscope insertion in unsedated patients: a randomized, controlled trial.
Chen PJ; Li CH; Huang TY; Shih YL; Chu HC; Chang WK; Hsieh TY
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jan; 77(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 23261097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colonoscopy using a small-caliber colonoscope with passive-bending after incomplete colonoscopy due to sharp angulation or pain.
Sato K; Shigiyama F; Ito S; Kitagawa T; Tominaga K; Suzuki T; Maetani I
Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4171-6. PubMed ID: 23722893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group.
DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the characteristics of the CF-H290I and PCF-Q260JI colonoscopes in non-sedated patients with a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery: a randomized controlled study.
Chen X; Zhu X; Wei B; Ji L; Yang C; Zhan Q
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024 Mar; 39(3):457-463. PubMed ID: 37984841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized trial of standard versus magnetic endoscope imaging colonoscopes for unsedated colonoscopy.
Shergill AK; McQuaid KR; Deleon A; McAnanama M; Shah JN
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 May; 75(5):1031-1036.e1. PubMed ID: 22381532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cap-assisted water immersion for minimal sedation colonoscopy: prospective, randomized, single-center trial.
Falt P; Šmajstrla V; Fojtík P; Liberda M; Kliment M; Tvrdík J; Urban O
Dig Endosc; 2013 Jul; 25(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 23808948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does "responsive insertion technology" improve practice of colonoscopy? Results of a randomized study.
Cuesta R; Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; García Sepulcre MF; Morillo E; Vázquez N
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 24417584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
