These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28488178)
1. A prospective randomized study of the use of an ultrathin colonoscope versus a pediatric colonoscope in sedation-optional colonoscopy. Sato K; Ito S; Kitagawa T; Hirahata K; Hihara D; Tominaga K; Yasuda I; Maetani I Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5150-5158. PubMed ID: 28488178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Propofol sedation for colonoscopy with a new ultrathin or a standard endoscope: a prospective randomized controlled study. Töx U; Schumacher B; Toermer T; Terheggen G; Mertens J; Holzapfel B; Lehmacher W; Goeser T; Neuhaus H Endoscopy; 2013 Jun; 45(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 23468196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrathin versus pediatric instruments for colonoscopy in older female patients: A randomized trial. Nemoto D; Utano K; Endo S; Isohata N; Hewett DG; Togashi K Dig Endosc; 2017 Mar; 29(2):168-174. PubMed ID: 27859645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis of the performance of ultrathin vs. standard colonoscopes. Sofi AA; Nawras A; Khan MA; Howden CW; Lee WM Endoscopy; 2017 Apr; 49(4):351-358. PubMed ID: 27852099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of discomfort during colonoscopy with conventional and ultrathin colonoscopes in ulcerative colitis patients. Ogawa T; Ohda Y; Nagase K; Kono T; Tozawa K; Tomita T; Iimuro M; Hida N; Oshima T; Fukui H; Hori K; Watari J; Nakamura S; Miwa H Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 24995962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized comparison of ultrathin and standard colonoscope in cecal intubation rate and patient tolerance. Luo DJ; Hui AJ; Yan KK; Ng SC; Wong VW; Chan FK; Cheong JP; Lam PP; Tse YK; Lau JY Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):484-90. PubMed ID: 21963069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope decreases the dose of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy: a randomized comparison of 3 colonoscopes. Lee DW; Li AC; Ko CW; Chu DW; Chan KC; Poon CM; Sin KS; Leung KF; Sze TS; Chan AC; Chung SC Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Mar; 65(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 17321243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduced pain during screening colonoscopy with an ultrathin colonoscope: a randomized controlled trial. Garborg KK; Løberg M; Matre J; Holme O; Kalager M; Hoff G; Bretthauer M Endoscopy; 2012 Aug; 44(8):740-6. PubMed ID: 22622786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective randomized study on the benefits of a new small-caliber colonoscope. Sato K; Ito S; Shigiyama F; Kitagawa T; Hirahata K; Tominaga K; Maetani I Endoscopy; 2012 Aug; 44(8):746-53. PubMed ID: 22833021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intermediate-length colonoscope needs more training duration than long-length colonoscope. Kim YG; Kim KJ; Yang DH; Ye BD; Byeon JS; Myung SJ; Yang SK; Kim JH Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):1007-13. PubMed ID: 24957569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for routine colonoscopy in women who have undergone hysterectomy. Marshall JB; Perez RA; Madsen RW Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 Jun; 55(7):838-41. PubMed ID: 12024137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrathin colonoscope with a diameter of 9.8 mm for total colonoscopy. Okamoto M; Kawabe T; Kato J; Yamaji Y; Ikenoue T; Omata M J Clin Gastroenterol; 2005 Sep; 39(8):679-83. PubMed ID: 16082276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long pediatric colonoscope versus intermediate length adult colonoscope for colonoscopy. Hsieh YH; Zhou AL; Lin HJ J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jul; 23(7 Pt 2):e7-e10. PubMed ID: 18702687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Carbon dioxide insufflation does not reduce pain scores during colonoscope insertion in unsedated patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Chen PJ; Li CH; Huang TY; Shih YL; Chu HC; Chang WK; Hsieh TY Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jan; 77(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 23261097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colonoscopy using a small-caliber colonoscope with passive-bending after incomplete colonoscopy due to sharp angulation or pain. Sato K; Shigiyama F; Ito S; Kitagawa T; Tominaga K; Suzuki T; Maetani I Surg Endosc; 2013 Nov; 27(11):4171-6. PubMed ID: 23722893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group. DeMarco DC; Odstrcil E; Lara LF; Bass D; Herdman C; Kinney T; Gupta K; Wolf L; Dewar T; Deas TM; Mehta MK; Anwer MB; Pellish R; Hamilton JK; Polter D; Reddy KG; Hanan I Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Mar; 71(3):542-50. PubMed ID: 20189513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the characteristics of the CF-H290I and PCF-Q260JI colonoscopes in non-sedated patients with a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery: a randomized controlled study. Chen X; Zhu X; Wei B; Ji L; Yang C; Zhan Q J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024 Mar; 39(3):457-463. PubMed ID: 37984841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized trial of standard versus magnetic endoscope imaging colonoscopes for unsedated colonoscopy. Shergill AK; McQuaid KR; Deleon A; McAnanama M; Shah JN Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 May; 75(5):1031-1036.e1. PubMed ID: 22381532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cap-assisted water immersion for minimal sedation colonoscopy: prospective, randomized, single-center trial. Falt P; Šmajstrla V; Fojtík P; Liberda M; Kliment M; Tvrdík J; Urban O Dig Endosc; 2013 Jul; 25(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 23808948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does "responsive insertion technology" improve practice of colonoscopy? Results of a randomized study. Cuesta R; Sola-Vera J; Uceda F; García Sepulcre MF; Morillo E; Vázquez N Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 24417584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]