156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28488232)
21. Conservative management of stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with positive resection margins after conization.
Kim WY; Chang SJ; Chang KH; Yoo SC; Ryu HS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 May; 109(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 20096835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Analysis of Conservative Surgical Treatment and Prognosis of Microinvasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix Stage IA1: Results of Follow-Up to 20 Years.
Hartman CA; Teixeira JC; Barbosa SB; Figueiredo SM; Andrade LA; Bastos JF
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Feb; 27(2):357-363. PubMed ID: 27984378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer.
Wong AS; Li WH; Cheung TH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Is conization once following by simple hysterectomy sufficient for all clinical stage IA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma?
Chen JR; Chiu ML; Wang TY; Chen TC; Wang KG; Su TH; Chang CL; Yang YC; Wang KL
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 52(3):385-8. PubMed ID: 24075378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical analysis of 314 patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion who underwent total hysterectomy directly: a multi-center, retrospective cohort study.
Lei L; Zhang L; Zheng Y; Ma W; Liu F; Li D; Chen K; Zeng Y
BMC Cancer; 2024 May; 24(1):575. PubMed ID: 38724921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Simple Hysterectomy for Residual Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasm.
Binyamin L; Segev M; Peled Y; Krissi H; Sabah G; Raban O; Jakobson-Setton A; Ben-Haroush A; Eitan R
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2018 Apr; 22(2):126-128. PubMed ID: 29474234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Risk factors of predicting residual disease in women with stage I a1 squamous cervical carcinoma after conization].
Zhu XE; Feng Y; Fu YF; Cheng XD; Chen XD; Xie X; Lü WG
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Feb; 93(7):534-6. PubMed ID: 23660325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins.
Diaz ES; Aoyama C; Baquing MA; Beavis A; Silva E; Holschneider C; Cass I
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24262876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Analysis of treatment modalities and prognosis on microinvasive cervical cancer: a 10-year cohort study in China.
Qian Q; Yang J; Cao D; You Y; Chen J; Shen K
J Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Oct; 25(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 25142622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Management of stage Ia1 squamous cervical cancer and the importance of excision margins: a retrospective study of long-term outcome after 25 years of follow-up.
Papakonstantinou K; Kyrgiou M; Lyons D; Soutter WP; Ghaem-Maghami S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Dec; 211(6):625.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24949540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Conservative treatment of microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix stage IA1: Defining conization height to an optimal oncological outcome.
Hartman CA; Bragança JF; Gurgel MSC; Zeferino LC; Andrade LALA; Teixeira JC
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253998. PubMed ID: 34283862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Necessity for subsequent surgery in women of child-bearing age with positive margins after conization.
Wang X; Xu J; Gao Y; Qu P
BMC Womens Health; 2021 May; 21(1):191. PubMed ID: 33962590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Surgical treatment of microinvasive cervical cancer: analysis of pathologic features with implications on radicality.
Yoneda JY; Braganca JF; Sarian LO; Borba PP; Conceição JC; Zeferino LC
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):694-8. PubMed ID: 25742569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Menopausal status is associated with a high risk for residual disease after cervical conization with positive margins.
Bilibio JP; Monego HI; Binda MLA; Dos Reis R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0217562. PubMed ID: 31163055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Post-Conization FIGO stage IA1 squamous cell cervical carcinoma; is hysterectomy necessary?
Escamilla Galindo EP; Medina Ramos NF; Santana Mateo YL; Armas Roca M; Molero Sala L; León Arencibia L; Arencibia Sánchez O; Martín Martínez AI
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Sep; 264():368-373. PubMed ID: 34399105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Conservative Treatment for Patients with Carcinoma in Situ-Positive Margins After a Loop Electroexcisional Procedure: Is It Safe?
Chong GO; Lee YH; Lee YS; Cho YL; Park JY; Hong DG
J Reprod Med; 2017; 62(1-2):37-44. PubMed ID: 29999280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effectiveness of cold-knife conization (CKC) for post-menopausal women with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a retrospective study.
Li X; Liu M; Ji Y; Qu P
BMC Surg; 2021 May; 21(1):241. PubMed ID: 33975589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Predictors for recurrent/persistent high-grade intraepithelial lesions and cervical stenosis after therapeutic conization: a retrospective analysis of 522 cases.
Tanaka Y; Ueda Y; Kakuda M; Kubota S; Matsuzaki S; Iwamiya T; Okazawa A; Matsuzaki S; Hashimoto K; Kobayashi E; Mabuchi S; Sawada K; Tomimatsu T; Yoshino K; Kimura T
Int J Clin Oncol; 2017 Oct; 22(5):921-926. PubMed ID: 28451844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predictors of the residual disease of high-grade lesions and microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix following conization.
Saeaib N; Boonyapipat S; Tungsinmunkong K; Liabsuetrakul T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Nov; 92(11):1406-12. PubMed ID: 19938730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Oncologic and obstetric outcomes after conization for adenocarcinoma in situ or stage IA1 cervical cancer.
Wang X; Bi Y; Wu H; Wu M; Li L
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19920. PubMed ID: 33199765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
