156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28488232)
41. Predictors of high-grade residual disease after repeat conization in patients with positive surgical margins.
Minareci Y; Ak N; Tosun OA; Sozen H; Disci R; Topuz S; Salihoglu MY
Ginekol Pol; 2022; 93(12):962-967. PubMed ID: 35894500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Predicting factors for positive vaginal surgical margin following radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 carcinoma of the cervix.
Sethasathien S; Charoenkwan K; Settakorn J; Srisomboon J
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(5):2211-5. PubMed ID: 24716959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Human papillomavirus test after conization in predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy specimens.
Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 114(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 19546763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Factors affecting residual lesion in women with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ after cone excisional biopsy.
Srisomboon J; Kietpeerakool C; Suprasert P; Siriaunkgul S; Khunamornpong S; Prompittayarat W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 17696736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Factors that influence persistence or recurrence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with positive margins after the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a retrospective study.
Zhu M; He Y; Baak JP; Zhou X; Qu Y; Sui L; Feng W; Wang Q
BMC Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15():744. PubMed ID: 26486312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Recurrence in Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion: The Role of the Excised Endocervical Canal Length-Analysis of 2,427 Patients.
Foggiatto AI; de Carvalho NS; Fonseca FV; Maestri CA
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2023 Jan; 27(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 36205329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Clinical outcomes of vaginectomy and laser ablation for the treatment of post-hysterectomy women with vaginal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: A retrospective study.
Shen F; Sun SG; Zhang XY; Wang Q; Ding JX; Hua KQ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 May; 248():71-76. PubMed ID: 32199295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Management of patients with positive margin after conization for high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions.
Zhang Y; Su Y; Tang Y; Qin L; Shen Y; Wang B; Zhou Y; Zhang M; Zhang T
Lasers Surg Med; 2022 Oct; 54(8):1099-1106. PubMed ID: 35811501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Clinicopathological Characteristics of Squamous Cell Carcinoma and High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Involving Endocervical Polyps.
Park CK; Kim YW; Koh HH; Yoon N; Bae GE; Kim HS
In Vivo; 2020; 34(5):2613-2621. PubMed ID: 32871791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of the safety between cervical conization and hysterectomy for patients with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.
Liu J; Wang Y; Wan X; Zou J; Zhu Y; Lv W; Shen Y
J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 34(1):e8. PubMed ID: 36424703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Evaluation of cervical conization as a definitive treatment for microinvasive cervical carcinoma and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.
Takeda N; Suzuki T; Suzuki M; Matsuura M; Tanaka R; Fujii M; Ito E; Saito T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Feb; 285(2):453-7. PubMed ID: 21681515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Safety of less aggressive surgery for stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.
Lee JY; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 May; 40(5):1382-8. PubMed ID: 24689464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Risk Factors for Persistence or Recurrence of High-Grade Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.
Bittencourt DD; Zanine RM; Sebastião APM; Ribas CM
Rev Col Bras Cir; 2023; 50():e20233537. PubMed ID: 38055549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Predictive Factors for Residual Disease After Conization in Cervical Cancer.
Baiocchi G; Diniz TP; Bovolim G; Gonçalves BT; Kumagai LY; Mantoan H; Faloppa CC; Guimaraes APG; da Costa AABA; Badiglian-Filho L; De Brot L
Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Oct; 28(11):6673-6681. PubMed ID: 33566245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Endocervical curettage, cone margins, and residual adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Denehy TR; Gregori CA; Breen JL
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 90(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9207802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study.
Casarin J; Buda A; Bogani G; Fanfani F; Papadia A; Ceccaroni M; Malzoni M; Pellegrino A; Ferrari F; Greggi S; Uccella S; Pinelli C; Cromi A; Ditto A; Di Martino G; Anchora LP; Falcone F; Bonfiglio F; Odicino F; Mueller M; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F; Landoni F; Ghezzi F
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 32665147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Clinicopathologic features of early adenocarcinoma of the cervix initially managed with cervical conization.
Poynor EA; Marshall D; Sonoda Y; Slomovitz BM; Barakat RR; Soslow RA
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):960-5. PubMed ID: 16860853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Treatment and outcome of stage Ia1 squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Haller H; Krašević M; Mamula O; Brnčić-Fischer A; Eminović S; Manestar M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Apr; 113(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 21315348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Risk for residual adenocarcinoma in situ or cervical adenocarcinoma in women undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure/conization for adenocarcinoma in situ.
DeSimone CP; Day ME; Dietrich CS; Tovar MM; Modesitt SC
J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(9-10):376-80. PubMed ID: 22010519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Residual disease following conization of women with stage IA-IB1 cervical carcinoma in a high incidence region.
Chatchotikawong U; Ruengkhachorn I; Leelaphatanadit C
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(17):7383-7. PubMed ID: 25227846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
