These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28488801)

  • 1. Measuring and achieving the best possible outcomes in surgery.
    Clavien PA; Puhan MA
    Br J Surg; 2017 Aug; 104(9):1121-1122. PubMed ID: 28488801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality indicators in pituitary surgery: a need for reliable and valid assessments. What should be measured?
    Powell M; Grossman A
    Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 2016 Apr; 84(4):485-8. PubMed ID: 26708277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safe surgery--a cornestone of quality.
    Leppäniemi A
    Scand J Surg; 2012; 101(3):146. PubMed ID: 22968235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding the reliability of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program as a quality comparator.
    Rhoads KF; Wren SM
    JAMA Surg; 2014 May; 149(5):474. PubMed ID: 24623013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of care measures for the vascular surgery patient.
    Brooke BS
    Semin Vasc Surg; 2015 Jun; 28(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 26655047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving Surgical Value and Culture Through Enhanced Recovery Programs.
    Lee L; Feldman LS
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Mar; 152(3):299-300. PubMed ID: 28114598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Service redesign. Fitter, faster: improved pathways speed up recovery.
    Grace C; Kuper M; Weldon S; Lees J; Modasia R; Mythen M
    Health Serv J; 2011 May; 121(6255):28-30. PubMed ID: 21682226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association between quality of care and complications after abdominal surgery.
    Bergman S; Deban M; Martelli V; Monette M; Sourial N; Hamadani F; Teasdale D; Holcroft C; Zakrzewski H; Fraser S
    Surgery; 2014 Sep; 156(3):632-9. PubMed ID: 24656856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interpret surgical outcome data with care.
    Holt PJ; Poloniecki JD; Thompson MM
    BMJ; 2008 Aug; 337():a1401. PubMed ID: 18753161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Impact of Surgical Care Improvement Project Measures on In-Hospital Outcomes following Elective Vascular Procedures.
    Nakazawa KR; Egorova NN; Power JR; Faries PL; Vouyouka AG
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2017 Jan; 38():17-28. PubMed ID: 27521819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using the quality improvement cycle on clinical indicators--improve or remove?
    Sketcher-Baker KM; Kamp MC; Connors JA; Martin DJ; Collins JE
    Med J Aust; 2010 Oct; 193(S8):S104-6. PubMed ID: 20955136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The volume-outcome relationship: don't believe everything you see.
    Christian CK; Gustafson ML; Betensky RA; Daley J; Zinner MJ
    World J Surg; 2005 Oct; 29(10):1241-4. PubMed ID: 16136280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sustained culture and surgical outcome improvement.
    Babic B; Volpe AA; Merola S; Mauer E; Cozacov Y; Ko CY; Michelassi F; Saldinger P
    Am J Surg; 2018 Nov; 216(5):841-845. PubMed ID: 29482831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pediatric American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: feasibility of a novel, prospective assessment of surgical outcomes.
    Raval MV; Dillon PW; Bruny JL; Ko CY; Hall BL; Moss RL; Oldham KT; Richards KE; Vinocur CD; Ziegler MM;
    J Pediatr Surg; 2011 Jan; 46(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 21238651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Benchmarking and peer reviewing with routine data, using the example of IQM (Initiative Qualitätsmedizin e.V.)].
    Scriba PC
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(5):396-400. PubMed ID: 21767800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What's up doc?
    Lilford R; Rosser D
    Health Serv J; 2013 Jun; 123(6357):19-21. PubMed ID: 23943998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Apples and oranges: comparison of ACS-NSQIP observed outcomes with premier's quality manager-predicted outcomes.
    Lee LC; Reines HD; Sheridan MJ; Farmer BE; Martin J; Duan M
    Am J Med Qual; 2011; 26(6):474-9. PubMed ID: 21835812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving outcomes using German Inpatient Quality Indicators in conjunction with peer review procedures.
    Mansky T; Völzke T; Nimptsch U
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(9-10):662-70. PubMed ID: 26699254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MyPOD: an EMR-Based Tool that Facilitates Quality Improvement and Maintenance of Certification.
    Berman L; Duffy B; Randall Brenn B; Vinocur C
    J Med Syst; 2017 Mar; 41(3):39. PubMed ID: 28102467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical Care Improvement Project: four years later, what's the status?
    Patterson P
    OR Manager; 2009 Aug; 25(8):1, 7-9. PubMed ID: 19725214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.