These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28490388)

  • 1. The ability of ewes with lambs to learn a virtual fencing system.
    Brunberg EI; Bergslid IK; Bøe KE; Sørheim KM
    Animal; 2017 Nov; 11(11):2045-2050. PubMed ID: 28490388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Heifers don't care: no evidence of negative impact on animal welfare of growing heifers when using virtual fences compared to physical fences for grazing.
    Hamidi D; Grinnell NA; Komainda M; Riesch F; Horn J; Ammer S; Traulsen I; Palme R; Hamidi M; Isselstein J
    Animal; 2022 Sep; 16(9):100614. PubMed ID: 35985122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effectiveness of Virtual Fencing of Bull Calves in a Holistic Grazing System.
    Staahltoft SK; Aaser MF; Jensen JNS; Zadran I; Sørensen EB; Nielsen AE; Alstrup AKO; Bruhn D; Linder AC; Sonne C; Frikke J; Pertoldi C
    Animals (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 36899774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do grazing beef and dairy cattle respond to virtual fences? A review.
    Wilms L; Komainda M; Hamidi D; Riesch F; Horn J; Isselstein J
    J Anim Sci; 2024 Jan; 102():. PubMed ID: 38619181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is Virtual Fencing an Effective Way of Enclosing Cattle? Personality, Herd Behaviour and Welfare.
    Aaser MF; Staahltoft SK; Korsgaard AH; Trige-Esbensen A; Alstrup AKO; Sonne C; Pertoldi C; Bruhn D; Frikke J; Linder AC
    Animals (Basel); 2022 Mar; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 35405832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Controlling Within-Field Sheep Movement Using Virtual Fencing.
    Marini D; Llewellyn R; Belson S; Lee C
    Animals (Basel); 2018 Feb; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 29495364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Virtual Fencing Is Comparable to Electric Tape Fencing for Cattle Behavior and Welfare.
    Campbell DLM; Lea JM; Keshavarzi H; Lee C
    Front Vet Sci; 2019; 6():445. PubMed ID: 31921906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Social influence on the effectiveness of virtual fencing in sheep.
    Marini D; Kearton T; Ouzman J; Llewellyn R; Belson S; Lee C
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10066. PubMed ID: 33062448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortisol in Manure from Cattle Enclosed with Nofence Virtual Fencing.
    Sonne C; Alstrup AKO; Pertoldi C; Frikke J; Linder AC; Styrishave B
    Animals (Basel); 2022 Nov; 12(21):. PubMed ID: 36359141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does Virtual Fencing Work for Grazing Dairy Cattle?
    Lomax S; Colusso P; Clark CEF
    Animals (Basel); 2019 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 31288490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporary Exclusion of Cattle from a Riparian Zone Using Virtual Fencing Technology.
    Campbell DLM; Haynes SJ; Lea JM; Farrer WJ; Lee C
    Animals (Basel); 2018 Dec; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 30583490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developing an Ethically Acceptable Virtual Fencing System for Sheep.
    Marini D; Meuleman MD; Belson S; Rodenburg TB; Llewellyn R; Lee C
    Animals (Basel); 2018 Feb; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 29495478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of maternal pedigree and ewe-lamb spatial relationships by application of Bluetooth technology in extensive farming systems.
    Sohi R; Trompf J; Marriott H; Bervan A; Godoy BI; Weerasinghe M; Desai A; Jois M
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Nov; 95(11):5145-5151. PubMed ID: 29293717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Impact of Group Size on Welfare Indicators of Ewes during Pregnancy.
    Averós X; Beltrán de Heredia I; Ruiz R; Estevez I
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0167061. PubMed ID: 27893817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Influence of Predictability and Controllability on Stress Responses to the Aversive Component of a Virtual Fence.
    Kearton T; Marini D; Cowley F; Belson S; Keshavarzi H; Mayes B; Lee C
    Front Vet Sci; 2020; 7():580523. PubMed ID: 33330702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Social Facilitation and Introduction Methods for Cattle on Virtual Fence Adaptation.
    Simonsen PA; Husted NS; Clausen M; Spens AM; Dyrholm RM; Thaysen IF; Aaser MF; Staahltoft SK; Bruhn D; Alstrup AKO; Sonne C; Pertoldi C
    Animals (Basel); 2024 May; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 38791673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tech-Savvy Beef Cattle? How Heifers Respond to Moving Virtual Fence Lines.
    Campbell DLM; Lea JM; Farrer WJ; Haynes SJ; Lee C
    Animals (Basel); 2017 Sep; 7(9):. PubMed ID: 28926989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of weaning age on hair sheep lamb and ewe production traits in an accelerated lambing system in the tropics.
    Godfrey RW; Weis AJ
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):1250-4. PubMed ID: 27065285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modern Virtual Fencing Application: Monitoring and Controlling Behavior of Goats Using GPS Collars and Warning Signals.
    Muminov A; Na D; Lee C; Kang HK; Jeon HS
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Apr; 19(7):. PubMed ID: 30987020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maternal influence on feeding site selection of male and female lambs.
    Wesley RL; Cibils AF; Black-Rubio CM; Pollak ER; Utsumi SA
    Animal; 2014 Jun; 8(6):991-9. PubMed ID: 24673841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.