These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28492570)

  • 21. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li H; Wang D; Yu Y; Zhao X; Jing X
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2016 Feb; 24():10. PubMed ID: 26830837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mechanical chest compressions improve rate of return of spontaneous circulation and allow for initiation of percutaneous circulatory support during cardiac arrest in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Venturini JM; Retzer E; Estrada JR; Friant J; Beiser D; Edelson D; Paul J; Blair J; Nathan S; Shah AP
    Resuscitation; 2017 Jun; 115():56-60. PubMed ID: 28377296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The LUCAS 2 chest compression device is not always efficient: an echographic confirmation.
    Giraud R; Siegenthaler N; Schussler O; Kalangos A; Müller H; Bendjelid K; Banfi C
    Ann Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 65(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 24530109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of the AutoPulse automated band chest compression device on hemodynamics in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.
    Duchateau FX; Gueye P; Curac S; Tubach F; Broche C; Plaisance P; Payen D; Mantz J; Ricard-Hibon A
    Intensive Care Med; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1256-60. PubMed ID: 20213073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A meta-analysis of the resuscitative effects of mechanical and manual chest compression in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
    Zhu N; Chen Q; Jiang Z; Liao F; Kou B; Tang H; Zhou M
    Crit Care; 2019 Mar; 23(1):100. PubMed ID: 30917840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A quality improvement initiative to optimize use of a mechanical chest compression device within a high-performance CPR approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.
    Levy M; Yost D; Walker RG; Scheunemann E; Mendive SR
    Resuscitation; 2015 Jul; 92():32-7. PubMed ID: 25913223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Safety of mechanical and manual chest compressions in cardiac arrest patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gao Y; Sun T; Yuan D; Liang H; Wan Y; Yuan B; Zhu C; Li Y; Yu Y
    Resuscitation; 2021 Dec; 169():124-135. PubMed ID: 34699924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis.
    Westfall M; Krantz S; Mullin C; Kaufman C
    Crit Care Med; 2013 Jul; 41(7):1782-9. PubMed ID: 23660728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A pilot study of mechanical chest compressions with the LUCAS™ device in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
    Smekal D; Johansson J; Huzevka T; Rubertsson S
    Resuscitation; 2011 Jun; 82(6):702-6. PubMed ID: 21419560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prehospital randomised assessment of a mechanical compression device in cardiac arrest (PaRAMeDIC) trial protocol.
    Perkins GD; Woollard M; Cooke MW; Deakin C; Horton J; Lall R; Lamb SE; McCabe C; Quinn T; Slowther A; Gates S;
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2010 Nov; 18():58. PubMed ID: 21054860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mechanical chest compression for out of hospital cardiac arrest: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gates S; Quinn T; Deakin CD; Blair L; Couper K; Perkins GD
    Resuscitation; 2015 Sep; 94():91-7. PubMed ID: 26190673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of chest compression interruption times across 2 automated devices: a randomized, crossover simulation study.
    Estock JL; Curinga HK; Li A; Grieve LB; Brackney CR
    Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Jan; 34(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 26472511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue-a prospective, randomized, cross-over manikin study.
    Putzer G; Braun P; Zimmermann A; Pedross F; Strapazzon G; Brugger H; Paal P
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 31(2):384-9. PubMed ID: 23000324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimal interruption of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for a single shock as mandated by automated external defibrillations does not compromise outcomes in a porcine model of cardiac arrest and resuscitation.
    Ristagno G; Tang W; Russell JK; Jorgenson D; Wang H; Sun S; Weil MH
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):3048-53. PubMed ID: 18824916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Chest compression-associated injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions versus automated chest compression devices (LUCAS II) - a forensic autopsy-based comparison.
    Ondruschka B; Baier C; Bayer R; Hammer N; Dreßler J; Bernhard M
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2018 Dec; 14(4):515-525. PubMed ID: 30203237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A case of hypothermic cardiac arrest treated with an external chest compression device (LUCAS) during transport to re-warming.
    Holmström P; Boyd J; Sorsa M; Kuisma M
    Resuscitation; 2005 Oct; 67(1):139-41. PubMed ID: 16129539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of CPR interruptions from transthoracic impedance during use of the LUCAS™ mechanical chest compression system.
    Yost D; Phillips RH; Gonzales L; Lick CJ; Satterlee P; Levy M; Barger J; Dodson P; Poggi S; Wojcik K; Niskanen RA; Chapman FW
    Resuscitation; 2012 Aug; 83(8):961-5. PubMed ID: 22310728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Mechanical cardiac massage].
    Christensen PH; Barnung S; Steinmetz J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2009 Aug; 171(35):2463-5. PubMed ID: 19732531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Poor chest compression quality with mechanical compressions in simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized, cross-over manikin study.
    Blomberg H; Gedeborg R; Berglund L; Karlsten R; Johansson J
    Resuscitation; 2011 Oct; 82(10):1332-7. PubMed ID: 21724317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Resuscitation, prolonged cardiac arrest, and an automated chest compression device.
    Risom M; Jørgensen H; Rasmussen LS; Sørensen AM
    J Emerg Med; 2010 May; 38(4):481-3. PubMed ID: 19217242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.