471 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28493424)
1. The Dynamic Multisite Interactions between Two Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Wu S; Wang D; Liu J; Feng Y; Weng J; Li Y; Gao X; Liu J; Wang W
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2017 Jun; 56(26):7515-7519. PubMed ID: 28493424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Extreme Fuzziness: Direct Interactions between Two IDPs.
Wang W; Wang D
Biomolecules; 2019 Feb; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 30813629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deciphering the Dynamic Interaction Profile of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein by NMR Exchange Spectroscopy.
Delaforge E; Kragelj J; Tengo L; Palencia A; Milles S; Bouvignies G; Salvi N; Blackledge M; Jensen MR
J Am Chem Soc; 2018 Jan; 140(3):1148-1158. PubMed ID: 29276882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A J-modulated protonless NMR experiment characterizes the conformational ensemble of the intrinsically disordered protein WIP.
Rozentur-Shkop E; Goobes G; Chill JH
J Biomol NMR; 2016 Dec; 66(4):243-257. PubMed ID: 27844185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recent advances in atomic molecular dynamics simulation of intrinsically disordered proteins.
Wang W
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2021 Jan; 23(2):777-784. PubMed ID: 33355572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of electrostatic interactions in binding of peptides and intrinsically disordered proteins to their folded targets. 1. NMR and MD characterization of the complex between the c-Crk N-SH3 domain and the peptide Sos.
Xue Y; Yuwen T; Zhu F; Skrynnikov NR
Biochemistry; 2014 Oct; 53(41):6473-95. PubMed ID: 25207671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Thermodynamic Basis of the Fuzzy Interaction of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein.
Hadži S; Mernik A; Podlipnik Č; Loris R; Lah J
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2017 Nov; 56(46):14494-14497. PubMed ID: 28914483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How Do We Study the Dynamic Structure of Unstructured Proteins: A Case Study on Nopp140 as an Example of a Large, Intrinsically Disordered Protein.
Na JH; Lee WK; Yu YG
Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Jan; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 29382046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modulation of Correlated Segment Fluctuations in IDPs upon Complex Formation as an Allosteric Regulatory Mechanism.
Beier A; Schwarz TC; Kurzbach D; Platzer G; Tribuzio F; Konrat R
J Mol Biol; 2018 Aug; 430(16):2439-2452. PubMed ID: 29733855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The sequence-ensemble relationship in fuzzy protein complexes.
Hadži S; Loris R; Lah J
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Sep; 118(37):. PubMed ID: 34504009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The importance of the compact disordered state in the fuzzy interactions between intrinsically disordered proteins.
Wang D; Wu S; Wang D; Song X; Yang M; Zhang W; Huang S; Weng J; Liu Z; Wang W
Chem Sci; 2022 Feb; 13(8):2363-2377. PubMed ID: 35310482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Elucidating binding mechanisms and dynamics of intrinsically disordered protein complexes using NMR spectroscopy.
Schneider R; Blackledge M; Jensen MR
Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2019 Feb; 54():10-18. PubMed ID: 30316104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Synergies of Single Molecule Fluorescence and NMR for the Study of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Naudi-Fabra S; Blackledge M; Milles S
Biomolecules; 2021 Dec; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 35053175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Features of molecular recognition of intrinsically disordered proteins via coupled folding and binding.
Yang J; Gao M; Xiong J; Su Z; Huang Y
Protein Sci; 2019 Nov; 28(11):1952-1965. PubMed ID: 31441158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of Dynamic IDP Complexes by NMR Spectroscopy.
Prestel A; Bugge K; Staby L; Hendus-Altenburger R; Kragelund BB
Methods Enzymol; 2018; 611():193-226. PubMed ID: 30471688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complete Coupled Binding-Folding Pathway of the Intrinsically Disordered Transcription Factor Protein Brinker Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Markov State Modeling.
Collins AP; Anderson PC
Biochemistry; 2018 Jul; 57(30):4404-4420. PubMed ID: 29990433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inhibition of protein 4.1 R and NuMA interaction by mutagenization of their binding-sites abrogates nuclear localization of 4.1 R.
Mattagajasingh SN; Huang SC; Benz EJ
Clin Transl Sci; 2009 Apr; 2(2):102-11. PubMed ID: 20443879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Recent Advances in Computational Protocols Addressing Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Bhattacharya S; Lin X
Biomolecules; 2019 Apr; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 30979035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phosphorylation Regulates the Bound Structure of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein: The p53-TAZ2 Case.
Ithuralde RE; Turjanski AG
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0144284. PubMed ID: 26742101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Conformational propensities of intrinsically disordered proteins influence the mechanism of binding and folding.
Arai M; Sugase K; Dyson HJ; Wright PE
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Aug; 112(31):9614-9. PubMed ID: 26195786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
