These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration. Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Effects of Ultraviolet Photofunctionalization on Bone Augmentation and Integration Capabilities of Titanium Mesh and Implants. Hirota M; Ikeda T; Tabuchi M; Ozawa T; Tohnai I; Ogawa T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 28095515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study. Shibli JA; Feres M; de Figueiredo LC; Iezzi G; Piattelli A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Mar; 8(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 17351679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The In Vivo Bone Response of Ultraviolet-Irradiated Titanium Implants Modified with Spontaneously Formed Nanostructures: An Experimental Study in Rabbits. Shen J; Liu J; Chen X; Wang X; He F; Wang H Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):776-84. PubMed ID: 27447142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A multi-center study comparing dual acid-etched and machined-surfaced implants in various bone qualities. Khang W; Feldman S; Hawley CE; Gunsolley J J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1384-90. PubMed ID: 11699480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Enhanced osseointegration of titanium implants with nanostructured surfaces: an experimental study in rabbits. Salou L; Hoornaert A; Louarn G; Layrolle P Acta Biomater; 2015 Jan; 11():494-502. PubMed ID: 25449926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A 36-month randomized controlled split-mouth trial comparing immediately loaded titanium oxide-anodized and machined implants supporting fixed partial dentures in the posterior mandible. Fung K; Marzola R; Scotti R; Tadinada A; Schincaglia GP Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):631-8. PubMed ID: 21691611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effects of ultrasonic scaler tips and toothbrush on titanium disc surfaces evaluated with confocal microscopy. Park JB; Kim N; Ko Y J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1552-8. PubMed ID: 22976659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Bone bonding strength of diamond-structured porous titanium-alloy implants manufactured using the electron beam-melting technique. Hara D; Nakashima Y; Sato T; Hirata M; Kanazawa M; Kohno Y; Yoshimoto K; Yoshihara Y; Nakamura A; Nakao Y; Iwamoto Y Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Feb; 59():1047-1052. PubMed ID: 26652463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Plaque accumulation on exposed titanium surfaces and peri-implant tissue behavior. A preliminary 1-year clinical study. Baldi D; Menini M; Pera F; Ravera G; Pera P Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(5):447-55. PubMed ID: 20095192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. A hydrophilic dental implant surface exhibits thrombogenic properties in vitro. Hong J; Kurt S; Thor A Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Feb; 15(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 21745323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Long-term biocompatibility and osseointegration of electron beam melted, free-form-fabricated solid and porous titanium alloy: experimental studies in sheep. Palmquist A; Snis A; Emanuelsson L; Browne M; Thomsen P J Biomater Appl; 2013 May; 27(8):1003-16. PubMed ID: 22207608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. In vivo evaluation of micro-rough and bioactive titanium dental implants using histometry and pull-out tests. Aparicio C; Padrós A; Gil FJ J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Nov; 4(8):1672-82. PubMed ID: 22098868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting. Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Biomechanical and histological behavior of zirconia implants: an experiment in the rat. Kohal RJ; Wolkewitz M; Hinze M; Han JS; Bächle M; Butz F Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 19298287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Early bone formation adjacent to oxidized and machined implant surfaces: a histologic study. Simion M; Benigni M; Al-Hezaimi K; Kim DM Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2015; 35(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 25734702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Osseointegration of Osseotite and machined-surfaced titanium implants in membrane-covered critical-sized defects: a histologic and histometric study in dogs. Veis AA; Papadimitriou S; Trisi P; Tsirlis AT; Parissis NA; Kenealy JN Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 17348879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. In vivo performance of selective electron beam-melted Ti-6Al-4V structures. Ponader S; von Wilmowsky C; Widenmayer M; Lutz R; Heinl P; Körner C; Singer RF; Nkenke E; Neukam FW; Schlegel KA J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Jan; 92(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 19165781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]