These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Comparison of conventional twist drill protocol and piezosurgery for implant insertion: an ex vivo study on different bone types. Sagheb K; Kumar VV; Azaripour A; Walter C; Al-Nawas B; Kämmerer PW Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Feb; 28(2):207-213. PubMed ID: 26799448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective clinical study to evaluate early success of short implants. Kennedy KS; Jones EM; Kim DG; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):170-7. PubMed ID: 23377063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conventional Drilling Versus Piezosurgery for Implant Site Preparation: A Meta-Analysis. Sendyk DI; de Oliveira NK; Pannuti CM; da Graça Naclério-Homem M; Wennerberg A; Deboni MCZ J Oral Implantol; 2018 Oct; 44(5):400-405. PubMed ID: 29583059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of dental experience on a dental implant navigation system. Sun TM; Lee HE; Lan TH BMC Oral Health; 2019 Oct; 19(1):222. PubMed ID: 31623636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. Vercruyssen M; Cox C; Coucke W; Naert I; Jacobs R; Quirynen M J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Piezoelectric vs. conventional drilling in implant site preparation: pilot controlled randomized clinical trial with crossover design. Canullo L; Peñarrocha D; Peñarrocha M; Rocio AG; Penarrocha-Diago M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1336-43. PubMed ID: 24147994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: twist drills versus piezosurgery. A single-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Stacchi C; Vercellotti T; Torelli L; Furlan F; Di Lenarda R Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 21682844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accurate implant placement. Digital scanning and use of tooth-guided, tooth-supported surgical guides. Jones PE Dent Today; 2013 Nov; 32(11):124, 126, 128. PubMed ID: 24358550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Observational Study on the Preparation of the Implant Site with Piezosurgery vs. Drill: Comparison between the Two Methods in terms of Postoperative Pain, Surgical Times, and Operational Advantages. Maglione M; Bevilacqua L; Dotto F; Costantinides F; Lorusso F; Scarano A Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():8483658. PubMed ID: 31662998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 2: rapid-prototype medical modeling and stereolithographic drilling guides requiring bone exposure. Rosenfeld AL; Mandelaris GA; Tardieu PB Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):347-53. PubMed ID: 16939016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inferior Alveolar Nerve Mobilization Using Ultrasonic Surgery With Crestal Approach Technique, Followed by Immediate Implant Insertion: Evaluation of Neurosensory Disturbance. Mavriqi L; Mortellaro C; Scarano A J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 27(5):1209-11. PubMed ID: 27380570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The combination of digital surface scanners and cone beam computed tomography technology for guided implant surgery using 3Shape implant studio software: a case history report. Lanis A; Álvarez Del Canto O Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 25822304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results. Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Piezoelectric vs. conventional implant site preparation: ex vivo implant primary stability. Baker JA; Vora S; Bairam L; Kim HI; Davis EL; Andreana S Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 22092442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]