These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28494042)

  • 1. Three-Dimensional Implant Positioning with a Piezosurgery Implant Site Preparation Technique and an Intraoral Surgical Navigation System: Case Report.
    Pellegrino G; Taraschi V; Vercellotti T; Ben-Nissan B; Marchetti C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(3):e163-e165. PubMed ID: 28494042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective randomized clinical comparison of 2 dental implant navigation systems.
    Wittwer G; Adeyemo WL; Schicho K; Birkfellner W; Enislidis G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):785-90. PubMed ID: 17974114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Material attrition and bone micromorphology after conventional and ultrasonic implant site preparation.
    Rashad A; Sadr-Eshkevari P; Weuster M; Schmitz I; Prochnow N; Maurer P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():110-4. PubMed ID: 22248387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional navigation in implant dentistry.
    Marquardt P; Witkowski S; Strub J
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2007; 2(1):80-98. PubMed ID: 19655496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of conventional twist drill protocol and piezosurgery for implant insertion: an ex vivo study on different bone types.
    Sagheb K; Kumar VV; Azaripour A; Walter C; Al-Nawas B; Kämmerer PW
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Feb; 28(2):207-213. PubMed ID: 26799448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Piezosurgery applied to implant dentistry: clinical and biological aspects.
    Pereira CC; Gealh WC; Meorin-Nogueira L; Garcia-Júnior IR; Okamoto R
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Jul; 40 Spec No():401-8. PubMed ID: 25020222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective clinical study to evaluate early success of short implants.
    Kennedy KS; Jones EM; Kim DG; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):170-7. PubMed ID: 23377063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conventional Drilling Versus Piezosurgery for Implant Site Preparation: A Meta-Analysis.
    Sendyk DI; de Oliveira NK; Pannuti CM; da Graça Naclério-Homem M; Wennerberg A; Deboni MCZ
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Oct; 44(5):400-405. PubMed ID: 29583059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of dental experience on a dental implant navigation system.
    Sun TM; Lee HE; Lan TH
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Oct; 19(1):222. PubMed ID: 31623636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template.
    Vercruyssen M; Cox C; Coucke W; Naert I; Jacobs R; Quirynen M
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Piezoelectric vs. conventional drilling in implant site preparation: pilot controlled randomized clinical trial with crossover design.
    Canullo L; Peñarrocha D; Peñarrocha M; Rocio AG; Penarrocha-Diago M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Dec; 25(12):1336-43. PubMed ID: 24147994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: twist drills versus piezosurgery. A single-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Stacchi C; Vercellotti T; Torelli L; Furlan F; Di Lenarda R
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):188-97. PubMed ID: 21682844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accurate implant placement. Digital scanning and use of tooth-guided, tooth-supported surgical guides.
    Jones PE
    Dent Today; 2013 Nov; 32(11):124, 126, 128. PubMed ID: 24358550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Observational Study on the Preparation of the Implant Site with Piezosurgery vs. Drill: Comparison between the Two Methods in terms of Postoperative Pain, Surgical Times, and Operational Advantages.
    Maglione M; Bevilacqua L; Dotto F; Costantinides F; Lorusso F; Scarano A
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():8483658. PubMed ID: 31662998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
    Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 2: rapid-prototype medical modeling and stereolithographic drilling guides requiring bone exposure.
    Rosenfeld AL; Mandelaris GA; Tardieu PB
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):347-53. PubMed ID: 16939016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inferior Alveolar Nerve Mobilization Using Ultrasonic Surgery With Crestal Approach Technique, Followed by Immediate Implant Insertion: Evaluation of Neurosensory Disturbance.
    Mavriqi L; Mortellaro C; Scarano A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 27(5):1209-11. PubMed ID: 27380570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The combination of digital surface scanners and cone beam computed tomography technology for guided implant surgery using 3Shape implant studio software: a case history report.
    Lanis A; Álvarez Del Canto O
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 25822304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.
    Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL
    J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Piezoelectric vs. conventional implant site preparation: ex vivo implant primary stability.
    Baker JA; Vora S; Bairam L; Kim HI; Davis EL; Andreana S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 22092442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.