207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28494090)
1. Technical Note: Transconvolution based equalization of positron energy effects for the use of
Prenosil GA; Hentschel M; Fürstner M; Krause T; Weitzel T; Klaeser B
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3761-3766. PubMed ID: 28494090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Isotope independent determination of PET/CT modulation transfer functions from phantom measurements on spheres.
Prenosil GA; Klaeser B; Hentschel M; Fürstner M; Berndt M; Krause T; Weitzel T
Med Phys; 2016 Oct; 43(10):5767. PubMed ID: 27782715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transconvolution and the virtual positron emission tomograph--a new method for cross calibration in quantitative PET∕CT imaging.
Prenosil GA; Weitzel T; Hentschel M; Klaeser B; Krause T
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):062503. PubMed ID: 23718608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multicentre quantitative
Huizing DMV; Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Gotthardt M; Boellaard R; Sera T; Sinaasappel M; Stokkel MPM; de Wit-van der Veen BJ
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Nov; 6(1):19. PubMed ID: 31705215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of the quantitative PET prostate phantom (Q3P) for improved quality assurance of
Fedrigo R; Coope R; Rahmim A; Bénard F; Uribe CF
Med Phys; 2024 Jun; 51(6):4311-4323. PubMed ID: 38348927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The quantification of PET-CT radiotracers to determine minimal scan time using quadratic formulation.
Said MA; Musarudin M; Zulkaffli NF
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Dec; 34(12):884-891. PubMed ID: 33141408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.
Doot RK; Scheuermann JS; Christian PE; Karp JS; Kinahan PE
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6035-46. PubMed ID: 21158315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The (68)Ge phantom-based FDG-PET site qualification program for clinical trials adopted by FIL (Italian Foundation on Lymphoma).
Chauvie S; Bergesio F; Fioroni F; Brambilla M; Biggi A; Versari A; Guerra L; Storto G; Musto P; Luminari S; Cabras MG; Balzarotti M; Rigacci L; Martelli M; Vitolo U; Federico M; Gallamini A
Phys Med; 2016 May; 32(5):651-6. PubMed ID: 27133138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recovery coefficients determination for partial volume effect correction in oncological PET/CT images considering the effect of activity outside the field of view.
Krempser AR; Ichinose RM; Miranda de Sá AM; Velasques de Oliveira SM; Carneiro MP
Ann Nucl Med; 2013 Dec; 27(10):924-30. PubMed ID: 24114312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using compressive sensing to recover images from PET scanners with partial detector rings.
Valiollahzadeh S; Clark JW; Mawlawi O
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 25563253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image-quality assessment for several positron emitters using the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards in the Siemens Inveon small-animal PET scanner.
Disselhorst JA; Brom M; Laverman P; Slump CH; Boerman OC; Oyen WJ; Gotthardt M; Visser EP
J Nucl Med; 2010 Apr; 51(4):610-7. PubMed ID: 20237025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of Ge-68/Ga-68-based versus CT-based attenuation correction on PET.
van Dalen JA; Visser EP; Vogel WV; Corstens FH; Oyen WJ
Med Phys; 2007 Mar; 34(3):889-97. PubMed ID: 17441234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Iodine-124 PET dosimetry in differentiated thyroid cancer: recovery coefficient in 2D and 3D modes for PET(/CT) systems.
Jentzen W; Weise R; Kupferschläger J; Freudenberg L; Brandau W; Bares R; Burchert W; Bockisch A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2008 Mar; 35(3):611-23. PubMed ID: 17929014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phantom validation of coregistration of PET and CT for image-guided radiotherapy.
Lavely WC; Scarfone C; Cevikalp H; Li R; Byrne DW; Cmelak AJ; Dawant B; Price RR; Hallahan DE; Fitzpatrick JM
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 15191296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Positron emission tomography with additional γ-ray detectors for multiple-tracer imaging.
Fukuchi T; Okauchi T; Shigeta M; Yamamoto S; Watanabe Y; Enomoto S
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2257-2266. PubMed ID: 28168704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental investigation of factors affecting the absolute recovery coefficients in iodine-124 PET lesion imaging.
Jentzen W
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 55(8):2365-98. PubMed ID: 20360631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positron range-free and multi-isotope tomography of positron emitters.
Beekman FJ; Kamphuis C; Koustoulidou S; Ramakers RM; Goorden MC
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065011. PubMed ID: 33578400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving PET Quantification of Small Animal [
Cal-Gonzalez J; Vaquero JJ; Herraiz JL; Pérez-Liva M; Soto-Montenegro ML; Peña-Zalbidea S; Desco M; Udías JM
Mol Imaging Biol; 2018 Aug; 20(4):584-593. PubMed ID: 29352372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differences in edge artifacts between 68Ga- and 18F-PET images reconstructed using point spread function correction.
Amakusa S; Matsuoka K; Baba S; Yoshida T; Sasaki M
Nucl Med Commun; 2019 Nov; 40(11):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 31469808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is the image quality of I-124-PET impaired by an automatic correction of prompt gammas?
Preylowski V; Schlögl S; Schoenahl F; Jörg G; Samnick S; Buck AK; Lassmann M
PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e71729. PubMed ID: 24014105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
