These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28494317)

  • 1. Consumer evaluations of processed meat products reformulated to be healthier - A conjoint analysis study.
    Shan LC; De Brún A; Henchion M; Li C; Murrin C; Wall PG; Monahan FJ
    Meat Sci; 2017 Sep; 131():82-89. PubMed ID: 28494317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality attributes and harmful components of cured meats: Exploring the attitudes of Italian consumers towards healthier cooked ham.
    Di Vita G; Blanc S; Brun F; Bracco S; D'Amico M
    Meat Sci; 2019 Sep; 155():8-15. PubMed ID: 31048239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors that predict consumer acceptance of enriched processed meats.
    Shan LC; Henchion M; De Brún A; Murrin C; Wall PG; Monahan FJ
    Meat Sci; 2017 Nov; 133():185-193. PubMed ID: 28711465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting dry-cured ham consumer acceptability.
    Morales R; Guerrero L; Aguiar AP; Guàrdia MD; Gou P
    Meat Sci; 2013 Nov; 95(3):652-7. PubMed ID: 23816516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumer Perception of Retail Pork Bacon Attributes Using Adaptive Choice-based Conjoint Analysis and Maximum Differential Scaling.
    McLean KG; Hanson DJ; Jervis SM; Drake MA
    J Food Sci; 2017 Nov; 82(11):2659-2668. PubMed ID: 29058811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are consumers willing to pay more for reformulated processed meat products in the context of the implementation of nutritional warnings? Case study with frankfurters in Chile.
    Schnettler B; Ares G; Sepúlveda N; Bravo S; Villalobos B; Hueche C; Lobos G
    Meat Sci; 2019 Jun; 152():104-108. PubMed ID: 30844619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consumer attitude and purchase intention towards processed meat products with natural compounds and a reduced level of nitrite.
    Hung Y; de Kok TM; Verbeke W
    Meat Sci; 2016 Nov; 121():119-126. PubMed ID: 27310600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using the animal to the last bit: Consumer preferences for different beef cuts.
    Scozzafava G; Corsi AM; Casini L; Contini C; Loose SM
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():70-79. PubMed ID: 26363423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing the sodium content without modifying the quality of beef burgers by adding micronized salt.
    Rios-Mera JD; Saldaña E; Cruzado-Bravo MLM; Patinho I; Selani MM; Valentin D; Contreras-Castillo CJ
    Food Res Int; 2019 Jul; 121():288-295. PubMed ID: 31108751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consumers' expected quality and intention to purchase high quality pork meat.
    Papanagiotou P; Tzimitra-Kalogianni I; Melfou K
    Meat Sci; 2013 Mar; 93(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 23273449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers.
    Slade P
    Appetite; 2018 Jun; 125():428-437. PubMed ID: 29501683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identifying consumer preferences for specific beef flavor characteristics in relation to cattle production and postmortem processing parameters.
    O'Quinn TG; Woerner DR; Engle TE; Chapman PL; Legako JF; Brooks JC; Belk KE; Tatum JD
    Meat Sci; 2016 Feb; 112():90-102. PubMed ID: 26560806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of salt and fat level variation on the physiochemical properties and sensory quality of pork breakfast sausages.
    Tobin BD; O'Sullivan MG; Hamill RM; Kerry JP
    Meat Sci; 2013 Feb; 93(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 23022579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of salt replacers and flavor enhancer on the processing characteristics and consumer acceptance of turkey sausages.
    Pietrasik Z; Gaudette NJ
    J Sci Food Agric; 2015 Jul; 95(9):1845-51. PubMed ID: 25155993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intensive vs. free-range organic beef. A preference study through consumer liking and conjoint analysis.
    García-Torres S; López-Gajardo A; Mesías FJ
    Meat Sci; 2016 Apr; 114():114-120. PubMed ID: 26771143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding the consumer's perception of traditional frankfurters and frankfurters with healthy attributes through sorting task and hard laddering techniques.
    Polizer Rocha YJ; de Noronha RLF; Trindade MA
    Meat Sci; 2019 Mar; 149():70-78. PubMed ID: 30476860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Harmful Compounds and Willingness to Buy for Reduced-Additives Salami. An Outlook on Italian Consumers.
    Di Vita G; Blanc S; Mancuso T; Massaglia S; La Via G; D'Amico M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jul; 16(14):. PubMed ID: 31336635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception of fat and other quality parameters in minced and burger meat from Spanish consumer studies.
    Cardona M; Gorriz A; Barat JM; Fernández-Segovia I
    Meat Sci; 2020 Aug; 166():108138. PubMed ID: 32276747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determinants of intention to reduce salt intake and willingness to purchase salt-reduced food products: Evidence from a web survey.
    Mørk T; Lähteenmäki L; Grunert KG
    Appetite; 2019 Aug; 139():110-118. PubMed ID: 31034859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impact of the Food Labeling and Other Factors on Consumer Preferences Using Discrete Choice Modeling-The Example of Traditional Pork Sausage.
    Czine P; Török Á; Pető K; Horváth P; Balogh P
    Nutrients; 2020 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 32545561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.