These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28494496)
1. Sensitivity to Binocular Disparity is Reduced by Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Schmidtmann G; Ruiz T; Reynaud A; Spiegel DP; Laguë-Beauvais M; Hess RF; Farivar R Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 May; 58(5):2630-2635. PubMed ID: 28494496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A normative dataset on human global stereopsis using the quick Disparity Sensitivity Function (qDSF). Reynaud A; Gao Y; Hess RF Vision Res; 2015 Aug; 113(Pt A):97-103. PubMed ID: 26028556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Binocular deficits associated with early alternating monocular defocus. I. Behavioral observations. Wensveen JM; Harwerth RS; Smith EL J Neurophysiol; 2003 Nov; 90(5):3001-11. PubMed ID: 14615424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Binocular deficits associated with early alternating monocular defocus. II. Neurophysiological observations. Zhang B; Matsuura K; Mori T; Wensveen JM; Harwerth RS; Smith EL; Chino Y J Neurophysiol; 2003 Nov; 90(5):3012-23. PubMed ID: 14615425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptual Relearning of Binocular Fusion and Stereoacuity After Brain Injury. Schaadt AK; Schmidt L; Reinhart S; Adams M; Garbacenkaite R; Leonhardt E; Kuhn C; Kerkhoff G Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2014 Jun; 28(5):462-71. PubMed ID: 24376065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. First- and second-order contrast sensitivity functions reveal disrupted visual processing following mild traumatic brain injury. Spiegel DP; Reynaud A; Ruiz T; Laguë-Beauvais M; Hess R; Farivar R Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():43-50. PubMed ID: 27036098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distance perception in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Ciuffreda KJ; Yadav NK; Han E; Ludlam DP; Peddle A; Hulse P; Walter S; Han J Optometry; 2012 Apr; 83(4):127-36. PubMed ID: 23231436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of distortions in images of natural scenes in mild traumatic brain injury patients. Jennings BJ; Schmidtmann G; Wehbé F; Kingdom FAA; Farivar R Vision Res; 2019 Aug; 161():12-17. PubMed ID: 31129288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence for elongated receptive field structure for mechanisms subserving stereopsis. Chen CC; Tyler CW Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2691-702. PubMed ID: 16580041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vergence responses to vertical binocular disparity during lexical identification. Nikolova M; Jainta S; Blythe HI; Jones MO; Liversedge SP Vision Res; 2015 Jan; 106():27-35. PubMed ID: 25433156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues. Harwerth RS; Moeller MC; Wensveen JM Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Binocularity during reading fixations: Properties of the minimum fixation disparity. Jainta S; Hoormann J; Kloke WB; Jaschinski W Vision Res; 2010 Aug; 50(18):1775-85. PubMed ID: 20573592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Encoding and estimation of first- and second-order binocular disparity in natural images. Hibbard PB; Goutcher R; Hunter DW Vision Res; 2016 Mar; 120():108-20. PubMed ID: 26731646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dichotomy between luminance and disparity features at binocular fixations. Liu Y; Cormack LK; Bovik AC J Vis; 2010 Oct; 10(12):23. PubMed ID: 21047755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses. Melmoth DR; Finlay AL; Morgan MJ; Grant S Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Aug; 50(8):3711-20. PubMed ID: 19339741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Coarse scales, fine scales, and their interactions in stereo vision. Farell B; Li S; McKee SP J Vis; 2004 Jun; 4(6):488-99. PubMed ID: 15330716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]