433 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28496006)
1. Gene expression signature of Gleason score is associated with prostate cancer outcomes in a radical prostatectomy cohort.
Jhun MA; Geybels MS; Wright JL; Kolb S; April C; Bibikova M; Ostrander EA; Fan JB; Feng Z; Stanford JL
Oncotarget; 2017 Jun; 8(26):43035-43047. PubMed ID: 28496006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Epigenetic signature of Gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Geybels MS; Wright JL; Bibikova M; Klotzle B; Fan JB; Zhao S; Feng Z; Ostrander EA; Lin DW; Nelson PS; Stanford JL
Clin Epigenetics; 2016; 8():97. PubMed ID: 27651837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic Utility of a New mRNA Expression Signature of Gleason Score.
Sinnott JA; Peisch SF; Tyekucheva S; Gerke T; Lis R; Rider JR; Fiorentino M; Stampfer MJ; Mucci LA; Loda M; Penney KL
Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Jan; 23(1):81-87. PubMed ID: 27663590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient-Level DNA Damage and Repair Pathway Profiles and Prognosis After Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer.
Evans JR; Zhao SG; Chang SL; Tomlins SA; Erho N; Sboner A; Schiewer MJ; Spratt DE; Kothari V; Klein EA; Den RB; Dicker AP; Karnes RJ; Yu X; Nguyen PL; Rubin MA; de Bono J; Knudsen KE; Davicioni E; Feng FY
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Apr; 2(4):471-80. PubMed ID: 26746117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A TMEFF2-regulated cell cycle derived gene signature is prognostic of recurrence risk in prostate cancer.
Georgescu C; Corbin JM; Thibivilliers S; Webb ZD; Zhao YD; Koster J; Fung KM; Asch AS; Wren JD; Ruiz-Echevarría MJ
BMC Cancer; 2019 May; 19(1):423. PubMed ID: 31060542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Construction of a set of novel and robust gene expression signatures predicting prostate cancer recurrence.
Jiang Y; Mei W; Gu Y; Lin X; He L; Zeng H; Wei F; Wan X; Yang H; Major P; Tang D
Mol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 12(9):1559-1578. PubMed ID: 30024105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Expression of cell cycle-regulated genes and prostate cancer prognosis in a population-based cohort.
Rubicz R; Zhao S; April C; Wright JL; Kolb S; Coleman I; Lin DW; Nelson PS; Ostrander EA; Feng Z; Fan JB; Stanford JL
Prostate; 2015 Sep; 75(13):1354-62. PubMed ID: 25990700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a 10-gene molecular signature for predicting biochemical recurrence and clinical metastasis in localized prostate cancer.
Abou-Ouf H; Alshalalfa M; Takhar M; Erho N; Donnelly B; Davicioni E; Karnes RJ; Bismar TA
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 May; 144(5):883-891. PubMed ID: 29511883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 17-gene assay to predict prostate cancer aggressiveness in the context of Gleason grade heterogeneity, tumor multifocality, and biopsy undersampling.
Klein EA; Cooperberg MR; Magi-Galluzzi C; Simko JP; Falzarano SM; Maddala T; Chan JM; Li J; Cowan JE; Tsiatis AC; Cherbavaz DB; Pelham RJ; Tenggara-Hunter I; Baehner FL; Knezevic D; Febbo PG; Shak S; Kattan MW; Lee M; Carroll PR
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):550-60. PubMed ID: 24836057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tissue-based Genomics Augments Post-prostatectomy Risk Stratification in a Natural History Cohort of Intermediate- and High-Risk Men.
Ross AE; Johnson MH; Yousefi K; Davicioni E; Netto GJ; Marchionni L; Fedor HL; Glavaris S; Choeurng V; Buerki C; Erho N; Lam LL; Humphreys EB; Faraj S; Bezerra SM; Han M; Partin AW; Trock BJ; Schaeffer EM
Eur Urol; 2016 Jan; 69(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 26058959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A novel non-canonical Wnt signature for prostate cancer aggressiveness.
Sandsmark E; Hansen AF; Selnæs KM; Bertilsson H; Bofin AM; Wright AJ; Viset T; Richardsen E; Drabløs F; Bathen TF; Tessem MB; Rye MB
Oncotarget; 2017 Feb; 8(6):9572-9586. PubMed ID: 28030815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing Prognostic Utility of a Single-marker Immunohistochemistry Approach with Commercial Gene Expression Profiling Following Radical Prostatectomy.
Leapman MS; Nguyen HG; Cowan JE; Xue L; Stohr B; Simko J; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
Eur Urol; 2018 Nov; 74(5):668-675. PubMed ID: 30181067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interrogation of ERG gene rearrangements in prostate cancer identifies a prognostic 10-gene signature with relevant implication to patients' clinical outcome.
Bismar TA; Alshalalfa M; Petersen LF; Teng LH; Gerke T; Bakkar A; Al-Mami A; Liu S; Dolph M; Mucci LA; Alhajj R
BJU Int; 2014 Feb; 113(2):309-19. PubMed ID: 24006850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gene expression panel predicts metastatic-lethal prostate cancer outcomes in men diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Rubicz R; Zhao S; Wright JL; Coleman I; Grasso C; Geybels MS; Leonardson A; Kolb S; April C; Bibikova M; Troyer D; Lance R; Lin DW; Ostrander EA; Nelson PS; Fan JB; Feng Z; Stanford JL
Mol Oncol; 2017 Feb; 11(2):140-150. PubMed ID: 28145099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic accuracy of Prostate Health Index and urinary Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 in predicting pathologic features after radical prostatectomy.
Cantiello F; Russo GI; Ferro M; Cicione A; Cimino S; Favilla V; Perdonà S; Bottero D; Terracciano D; De Cobelli O; Morgia G; Damiano R
Urol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(4):163.e15-23. PubMed ID: 25575715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative alterations in nuclear structure predict prostate carcinoma distant metastasis and death in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Khan MA; Walsh PC; Miller MC; Bales WD; Epstein JI; Mangold LA; Partin AW; Veltri RW
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(12):2583-91. PubMed ID: 14669277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Akt Activation Correlates with Snail Expression and Potentially Determines the Recurrence of Prostate Cancer in Patients at Stage T2 after a Radical Prostatectomy.
Chen WY; Hua KT; Lee WJ; Lin YW; Liu YN; Chen CL; Wen YC; Chien MH
Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Jul; 17(8):. PubMed ID: 27455254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival.
Turker P; Bas E; Bozkurt S; Günlüsoy B; Sezgin A; Postacı H; Turkeri L
Urol Oncol; 2013 Jan; 31(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 21316989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
