These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28497053)
1. Numerical Evaluation of Image Contrast for Thicker and Thinner Objects among Current Intraoral Digital Imaging Systems. Dashpuntsag O; Yoshida M; Kasai R; Maeda N; Hosoki H; Honda E Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():5215413. PubMed ID: 28497053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Efficiency and Image Quality of Photostimulable Phosphor Plate and Charge-Coupled Device Receptors in Dental Radiography. Zhang W; Huynh C; Jadhav A; Pinales J; Arvizu L; Tsai J; Flores N J Dent Educ; 2019 Oct; 83(10):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 31235501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis. Yoshiura K; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Goto TK; Chikui T; Kawazu T; Okamura K Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems. Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography. Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of two digital intraoral radiography imaging systems as a function of contrast resolution and exposure time. Aydin KC; Demirel O; Özcan M Minerva Stomatol; 2020 Jun; 69(3):148-152. PubMed ID: 32610723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems. Marshall NW Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates. Zhang W; Huynh CP; Abramovitch K; Leon IL; Arvizu L Tex Dent J; 2012 Jun; 129(6):589-96. PubMed ID: 22866414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography. Borg E Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of image defects in digital intraoral radiography based on photostimulable phosphor plates. Tashiro M; Nakatani A; Sugiura K; Nakayama E Oral Radiol; 2023 Apr; 39(2):355-363. PubMed ID: 35948784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparative study on radio-opacity of dental composite resin materials'determination using film imaging and digital imaging]. Li Y; Lin H; Zhang TJ Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2021 Oct; 53(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 34650308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems. Udupa H; Mah P; Dove SB; McDavid WD Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Dec; 116(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 24237729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perception versus reality-findings from a phosphor plate quality assurance study. Buchanan A; Benton B; Carraway A; Looney S; Kalathingal S Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Apr; 123(4):496-501. PubMed ID: 28159585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Students' attitudes to digital radiography and measurement accuracy of two digital systems in connection with root canal treatment. Wenzel A; Kirkevang LL Eur J Dent Educ; 2004 Nov; 8(4):167-71. PubMed ID: 15469443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of resolution characteristics of digital intraoral radiographic images using a task transfer function. Kuramoto T; Takarabe S; Tsuru H; Shibayama Y; Kato T; Yoshiura K Oral Radiol; 2022 Oct; 38(4):638-644. PubMed ID: 35767125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic exposure control at MDCT based on the contrast-to-noise ratio: theoretical background and phantom study. Funama Y; Sugaya Y; Miyazaki O; Utsunomiya D; Yamashita Y; Awai K Phys Med; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 22182517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of an advanced image-based technique to calculate virtual monoenergetic computed tomographic images from a dual-energy examination to improve contrast-to-noise ratio in examinations using iodinated contrast media. Grant KL; Flohr TG; Krauss B; Sedlmair M; Thomas C; Schmidt B Invest Radiol; 2014 Sep; 49(9):586-92. PubMed ID: 24710203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How Does Ambient Light Affect the Image Quality of Phosphor Plate Digital Radiography? A Quantitative Analysis Using Contemporary Digital Radiographic Systems. Sampaio-Oliveira M; Marinho-Vieira LE; Wanderley VA; Ambrosano GMB; Pauwels R; Oliveira ML Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(22):. PubMed ID: 36433224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay. Nair MK; Ludlow JB; May KN; Nair UP; Johnson MP; Close JM Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality assurance phantom for digital dental imaging. Mah P; McDavid WD; Dove SB Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Nov; 112(5):632-9. PubMed ID: 21862364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]