217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28497720)
1. Neuroscience and Ethics.
Liao SM
Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 64(2):82-92. PubMed ID: 28497720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Personality and moral judgment: Curious consequentialists and polite deontologists.
Smillie LD; Katic M; Laham SM
J Pers; 2021 May; 89(3):549-564. PubMed ID: 33025607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the Wrong Track: Process and Content in Moral Psychology.
Kahane G
Mind Lang; 2012 Nov; 27(5):519-545. PubMed ID: 23335831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Moral Hindsight.
Fleischhut N; Meder B; Gigerenzer G
Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 64(2):110-123. PubMed ID: 28497719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A person-centered approach to moral judgment.
Uhlmann EL; Pizarro DA; Diermeier D
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 10(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25910382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The New Ethics of Neuroethics.
Buller T
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2018 Oct; 27(4):558-565. PubMed ID: 30720414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neuroscientific challenges to free will and responsibility.
Roskies A
Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Sep; 10(9):419-23. PubMed ID: 16901745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do People Believe That They Are More Deontological Than Others?
Li MH; Rao LL
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1308-1320. PubMed ID: 30698496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What is neuroethics? Empirical and theoretical neuroethics.
Northoff G
Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 22(6):565-9. PubMed ID: 19809322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ignorance and moral judgment: Testing the logical priority of the epistemic.
Crutchfield P; Scheall S; Justin Rzeszutek M; Dawn Brown H; Cardoso Sao Mateus C
Conscious Cogn; 2023 Feb; 108():103472. PubMed ID: 36724707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. United we stand, divided we fall: Cognition, emotion, and the moral link between them.
Manfrinati A
Behav Brain Sci; 2015; 38():e80. PubMed ID: 26785722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Moral Enhancement Meets Normative and Empirical Reality: Assessing the Practical Feasibility of Moral Enhancement Neurotechnologies.
Dubljević V; Racine E
Bioethics; 2017 Jun; 31(5):338-348. PubMed ID: 28503833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Action trees and moral judgment.
Knobe J
Top Cogn Sci; 2010 Jul; 2(3):555-78. PubMed ID: 25163876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The challenges of neuroethics.
Reichlin M
Funct Neurol; 2007; 22(4):235-42. PubMed ID: 18182130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What makes moral dilemma judgments "utilitarian" or "deontological"?
Gawronski B; Beer JS
Soc Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 12(6):626-632. PubMed ID: 27745112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compassion, ethics, and neuroscience: neuroethics through Buddhist eyes.
Tsomo KL
Sci Eng Ethics; 2012 Sep; 18(3):529-37. PubMed ID: 22618161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodological Issues in the Neuroscience of Moral Judgement.
Kahane G; Shackel N
Mind Lang; 2010 Nov; 25(5):561-582. PubMed ID: 22427714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Neuroethics as the neuroscience of ethics].
Álvarez-Díaz JA
Rev Neurol; 2013 Oct; 57(8):374-82. PubMed ID: 24081892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are the folk utilitarian about animals?
Kahane G; Caviola L
Philos Stud; 2023; 180(4):1081-1103. PubMed ID: 35966171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
