These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28497720)

  • 21. What We Talk About When We Talk About Morality: Deontological, Consequentialist, and Emotive Language Use in Justifications Across Foundation-Specific Moral Violations.
    Wheeler MA; Laham SM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1206-16. PubMed ID: 27340149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Neuroscientists' everyday experiences of ethics: the interplay of regulatory, professional, personal and tangible ethical spheres.
    Brosnan C; Cribb A; Wainwright SP; Williams C
    Sociol Health Illn; 2013 Nov; 35(8):1133-48. PubMed ID: 23397962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Regulating Genome Editing: For an Enlightened Democratic Governance.
    Cavaliere G; Devolder K; Giubilini A
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2019 Jan; 28(1):76-88. PubMed ID: 30570466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Socrates in the fMRI Scanner: The Neurofoundations of Morality and the Challenge to Ethics.
    Rueda J
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2021 Oct; 30(4):604-612. PubMed ID: 34702416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Investigating emotion in moral cognition: a review of evidence from functional neuroimaging and neuropsychology.
    Young L; Koenigs M
    Br Med Bull; 2007; 84():69-79. PubMed ID: 18029385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The rat-a-gorical imperative: Moral intuition and the limits of affective learning.
    Greene JD
    Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():66-77. PubMed ID: 28343626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The ethics of neuroscience and the neuroscience of ethics: a phenomenological-existential approach.
    Frost CJ; Lumia AR
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2012 Sep; 18(3):457-74. PubMed ID: 23054668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making.
    Gawronski B; Armstrong J; Conway P; Friesdorf R; Hütter M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Sep; 113(3):343-376. PubMed ID: 28816493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Can Neuroscience Contribute to Practical Ethics? A Critical Review and Discussion of the Methodological and Translational Challenges of the Neuroscience of Ethics.
    Racine E; Dubljević V; Jox RJ; Baertschi B; Christensen JF; Farisco M; Jotterand F; Kahane G; Müller S
    Bioethics; 2017 Jun; 31(5):328-337. PubMed ID: 28503831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of brain lesions on moral agency: ethical dilemmas in investigating moral behavior.
    Christen M; Müller S
    Curr Top Behav Neurosci; 2015; 19():159-88. PubMed ID: 25120025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The contribution of neuroscience to the understanding of moral behavior].
    Slachevsky A; Silva JR; Prenafeta ML; Novoa F
    Rev Med Chil; 2009 Mar; 137(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 19621186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Revisiting the divide between deontology and utilitarianism in moral dilemma judgment: A multinomial modeling approach.
    Hennig M; Hütter M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Jan; 118(1):22-56. PubMed ID: 31478705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach.
    Conway P; Gawronski B
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):216-35. PubMed ID: 23276267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Gender differences in moral judgment and the evaluation of gender-specified moral agents.
    Capraro V; Sippel J
    Cogn Process; 2017 Nov; 18(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 28597324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Emotional evidence and jurors' judgments: the promise of neuroscience for informing psychology and law.
    Salerno JM; Bottoms BL
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(2):273-96. PubMed ID: 19319835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Explaining Moral Behavior.
    Osman M; Wiegmann A
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 64(2):68-81. PubMed ID: 28497724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Parental wisdom, empirical blindness, and normative evaluation of prenatal genetic enhancement.
    Tonkens R
    J Med Philos; 2011 Jun; 36(3):274-95. PubMed ID: 21597084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Naturalizing Responsibility.
    Zullo S
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2016 Oct; 25(4):700-11. PubMed ID: 27634721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A neuroscientific approach to normative judgment in law and justice.
    Goodenough OR; Prehn K
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2004 Nov; 359(1451):1709-26. PubMed ID: 15590612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Unfounded dumbfounding: How harm and purity undermine evidence for moral dumbfounding.
    Guglielmo S
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():334-337. PubMed ID: 28803616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.