These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28497993)

  • 21. [Relationship between sweetness liking, taste sensitivity and sweetening habits in adults].
    Klimacka-Nawrot E; Suchecka W; Błońska-Fajfrowska B
    Wiad Lek; 2005; 58(3-4):174-9. PubMed ID: 16119160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rate-All-That-Apply (RATA) comparison of taste profiles for different sweeteners in black tea, chocolate milk, and natural yogurt.
    Tan VWK; Wee MSM; Tomic O; Forde CG
    J Food Sci; 2020 Feb; 85(2):486-492. PubMed ID: 31968393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nonnutritive sweeteners are not supernormal stimuli.
    Antenucci RG; Hayes JE
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2015 Feb; 39(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 24942868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sweet and fat taste preference in obesity have different associations with personality and eating behavior.
    Elfhag K; Erlanson-Albertsson C
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Jun; 88(1-2):61-6. PubMed ID: 16624348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of Sweet-Liking on Body Composition Depend on Age and Lifestyle: A Challenge to the Simple Sweet-Liking-Obesity Hypothesis.
    Iatridi V; Armitage RM; Yeomans MR; Hayes JE
    Nutrients; 2020 Sep; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 32899675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium.
    Dess NK; Dobson K; Roberts BT; Chapman CD
    Chem Senses; 2017 Jun; 42(5):381-392. PubMed ID: 28334357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neural responses to oral administration of erythritol vs. sucrose and sucralose explain differences in subjective liking ratings.
    Budzinska A; Teysseire F; Flad E; Dupont P; Wölnerhanssen B; Meyer-Gerspach AC; Van Oudenhove L; Weltens N
    Appetite; 2024 Sep; 200():107422. PubMed ID: 38788930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Effect of Artificial Sweeteners Use on Sweet Taste Perception and Weight Loss Efficacy: A Review.
    Wilk K; Korytek W; Pelczyńska M; Moszak M; Bogdański P
    Nutrients; 2022 Mar; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 35334918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Comparison of Psychophysical Dose-Response Behaviour across 16 Sweeteners.
    Wee M; Tan V; Forde C
    Nutrients; 2018 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 30400167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Postoral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sugar reward in C57BL/6J mice.
    Sclafani A; Zukerman S; Ackroff K
    Chem Senses; 2015 May; 40(4):245-58. PubMed ID: 25715333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sociodemographic, psychological, and lifestyle characteristics are associated with a liking for salty and sweet tastes in French adults.
    Lampuré A; Schlich P; Deglaire A; Castetbon K; Péneau S; Hercberg S; Méjean C
    J Nutr; 2015 Mar; 145(3):587-94. PubMed ID: 25733476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sensory characteristics and relative sweetness of tagatose and other sweeteners.
    Fujimaru T; Park JH; Lim J
    J Food Sci; 2012 Sep; 77(9):S323-8. PubMed ID: 22908895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Eating tasty food to cope. Longitudinal association with BMI.
    Boggiano MM; Wenger LE; Turan B; Tatum MM; Morgan PR; Sylvester MD
    Appetite; 2015 Apr; 87():365-70. PubMed ID: 25596500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. New insight into human sweet taste: a genome-wide association study of the perception and intake of sweet substances.
    Hwang LD; Lin C; Gharahkhani P; Cuellar-Partida G; Ong JS; An J; Gordon SD; Zhu G; MacGregor S; Lawlor DA; Breslin PAS; Wright MJ; Martin NG; Reed DR
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2019 Jun; 109(6):1724-1737. PubMed ID: 31005972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Female rats show a bimodal preference response to the artificial sweetener sucralose.
    Sclafani A; Clare RA
    Chem Senses; 2004 Jul; 29(6):523-8. PubMed ID: 15269124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sweet and sour sips: No effect of repeated exposure to sweet or sour-tasting sugary drinks on children's sweetness preference and liking.
    Mueller C; Zeinstra GG; Forde CG; Jager G
    Appetite; 2024 May; 196():107277. PubMed ID: 38368909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of aspartame and sucrose on hunger and energy intake in humans.
    Mattes R
    Physiol Behav; 1990 Jun; 47(6):1037-44. PubMed ID: 2395908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preferences for salty and sweet tastes are elevated and related to each other during childhood.
    Mennella JA; Finkbeiner S; Lipchock SV; Hwang LD; Reed DR
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e92201. PubMed ID: 24637844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of frequency of consumption of artificial sweeteners on sweetness liking by women.
    Mahar A; Duizer LM
    J Food Sci; 2007 Nov; 72(9):S714-8. PubMed ID: 18034758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Associations between weight status and liking scores for sweet, salt and fat according to the gender in adults (The Nutrinet-Santé study).
    Deglaire A; Méjean C; Castetbon K; Kesse-Guyot E; Hercberg S; Schlich P
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2015 Jan; 69(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 25074389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.