These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1083 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28498072)

  • 1. Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique.
    Maki S; Aramomi M; Matsuura Y; Furuya T; Ota M; Iijima Y; Saito J; Suzuki T; Mannoji C; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Koda M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):415-420. PubMed ID: 28498072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation.
    Hostin RA; Wu C; Perra JH; Polly DW; Akesen B; Wroblewski JM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2415-21. PubMed ID: 18923316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using lamina screws as a salvage technique at C-7: computed tomography and biomechanical analysis using cadaveric vertebrae. Laboratory investigation.
    Cardoso MJ; Dmitriev AE; Helgeson MD; Stephens F; Campbell V; Lehman RA; Cooper P; Rosner MK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Jul; 11(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 19569937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of a new technique for pedicle screw and Magerl screw insertion using a 3-dimensional image guide.
    Kawaguchi Y; Nakano M; Yasuda T; Seki S; Hori T; Kimura T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Nov; 37(23):1983-8. PubMed ID: 22531473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pedicle screws can be 4 times stronger than lateral mass screws for insertion in the midcervical spine: a biomechanical study on strength of fixation.
    Ito Z; Higashino K; Kato S; Kim SS; Wong E; Yoshioka K; Hutton WC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Apr; 27(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22373932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of freehand pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws in the subaxial cervical spine.
    Hey HWD; Zhuo WH; Tan YHJ; Tan JH
    Spine Deform; 2020 Oct; 8(5):1049-1058. PubMed ID: 32314180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study.
    Hong JT; Tomoyuki T; Jain A; Orías AAE; Inoue N; An HS
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2417-2424. PubMed ID: 28752245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques.
    Ludwig SC; Kramer DL; Balderston RA; Vaccaro AR; Foley KF; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jul; 25(13):1655-67. PubMed ID: 10870141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Considerations for the use of C7 crossing laminar screws in subaxial and cervicothoracic instrumentation.
    Ilgenfritz RM; Gandhi AA; Fredericks DC; Grosland NM; Smucker JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(4):E199-204. PubMed ID: 23169075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computed tomographic evaluation of three types of screw trajectories for posterior cervical spine fixation: Cervical pedicle screw, lateral mass screw, and paravertebral foramen screw.
    Tsuda K; Tagami A; Yamada S; Yokota K; Chiba K; Yonekura A; Tomita M; Osaki M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Jul; 101(28):e29857. PubMed ID: 35839061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical Study of Novel Unilateral Fixation Combining Unilateral Pedicle and Contralateral Translaminar Screws in the Subaxial Cervical Spine.
    Shi L; Shen K; Chu L; Yu KX; Yu QS; Deng R; Deng ZL
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jan; 121():e684-e690. PubMed ID: 30292663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of pedicle screw redirection after lateral wall breach--a biomechanical study using human lumbar vertebrae.
    Stauff MP; Freedman BA; Kim JH; Hamasaki T; Yoon ST; Hutton WC
    Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23623630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of a dynamic surgical guidance probe for screw insertion in the cervical spine: a cadaveric study.
    Dixon D; Darden B; Casamitjana J; Weissmann KA; Cristobal S; Powell D; Baluch D
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):1149-1153. PubMed ID: 27844228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical transfacet versus lateral mass screws: a biomechanical comparison.
    Klekamp JW; Ugbo JL; Heller JG; Hutton WC
    J Spinal Disord; 2000 Dec; 13(6):515-8. PubMed ID: 11132983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical pedicle screw insertion using a computed tomography cutout technique.
    Miyamoto H; Uno K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 19951020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel patient-specific navigational template for cervical pedicle screw placement.
    Lu S; Xu YQ; Lu WW; Ni GX; Li YB; Shi JH; Li DP; Chen GP; Chen YB; Zhang YZ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(26):E959-66. PubMed ID: 20010385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preliminary experience with a novel facet-based lateral mass drill guide for the placement of lateral mass screws compared to freehand technique: a cadaveric study.
    Mundis GM; Olsson EC; Hart RA; Williams SK; Martyn R; Orndorff DG; Berg AL; Russell NA; Vizesi F
    Spine J; 2023 Jun; 23(6):912-920. PubMed ID: 36736741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tapping insertional torque allows prediction for better pedicle screw fixation and optimal screw size selection.
    Helgeson MD; Kang DG; Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE; Luhmann SJ
    Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):957-65. PubMed ID: 23602374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws.
    Liu GY; Xu RM; Ma WH; Sun SH; Huang L; Ying JW; Jiang WY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Aug; 121(15):1390-3. PubMed ID: 18959115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths.
    Johnston TL; Karaikovic EE; Lautenschlager EP; Marcu D
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 17088197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 55.