195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28498243)
1. A Controlled Study on Vaginal Blood Flow During Sexual Arousal Among Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Survivors Treated With Conventional Radical or Nerve-Sparing Surgery With or Without Radiotherapy.
Bakker RM; Pieterse QD; van Lonkhuijzen LRCW; Trimbos BJBMZ; Creutzberg CL; Kenter GG; de Kroon CD; Ter Kuile MM
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Jun; 27(5):1051-1057. PubMed ID: 28498243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vaginal blood flow after radical hysterectomy with and without nerve sparing. A preliminary report.
Pieterse QD; Ter Kuile MM; Deruiter MC; Trimbos JB; Kenter GG; Maas CP
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2008; 18(3):576-83. PubMed ID: 17692083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Objective assessment of sexual arousal in women with a history of hysterectomy.
Maas CP; ter Kuile MM; Laan E; Tuijnman CC; Weijenborg PT; Trimbos JB; Kenter GG
BJOG; 2004 May; 111(5):456-62. PubMed ID: 15104610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pelvic nerve injury negatively impacts female genital blood flow and induces vaginal fibrosis-implications for human nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.
Castiglione F; Bergamini A; Albersen M; Hannan JL; Bivalacqua TJ; Bettiga A; Benigni F; Salonia A; Montorsi F; Hedlund P
BJOG; 2015 Oct; 122(11):1457-65. PubMed ID: 26179559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sexuality and quality of life after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A prospective study.
Novackova M; Pastor Z; Chmel R; Mala I; Chmel R
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jul; 61(4):641-645. PubMed ID: 35779914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Roh JW; Lee DO; Suh DH; Lim MC; Seo SS; Chung J; Lee S; Park SY
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 26(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 25872890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].
Li B; Zhang R; Wu LY; Zhang GY; Li X; Yu GZ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 19087497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Long Y; Yao DS; Pan XW; Ou TY
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94116. PubMed ID: 24748015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].
Zhu T; Yu AJ; Shou HF; Chen X; Zhu JQ; Yang ZY; Zhang P; Gao YL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 33(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 21575466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and quality of life.
van Gent MD; Romijn LM; van Santen KE; Trimbos JB; de Kroon CD
Maturitas; 2016 Dec; 94():30-38. PubMed ID: 27823742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nerve-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy versus nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in early-stage (FIGO IA2-IB) cervical cancer: a comparative study on feasibility and outcome.
van Gent MD; van den Haak LW; Gaarenstroom KN; Peters AA; van Poelgeest MI; Trimbos JB; de Kroon CD
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 May; 24(4):735-43. PubMed ID: 24651626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nerve-sparing approach reduces sexual dysfunction in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
Bogani G; Serati M; Nappi R; Cromi A; di Naro E; Ghezzi F
J Sex Med; 2014 Dec; 11(12):3012-20. PubMed ID: 25244064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study.
Hao M; Wang Z; Wei F; Wang J; Wang W; Ping Y
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):594-9. PubMed ID: 26807637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oncological outcomes of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review.
Basaran D; Dusek L; Majek O; Cibula D
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):3033-40. PubMed ID: 25613389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Favorable factors for preserving bladder function after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: A protocol-based validation study.
Kim HS; Kim M; Luo Y; Lee M; Song YS;
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):492-499. PubMed ID: 28695641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness and Long-term Outcomes of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Yamamoto A; Kamoi S; Ikeda M; Yamada T; Yoneyama K; Takeshita T
J Nippon Med Sch; 2021 Nov; 88(5):386-397. PubMed ID: 32741908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Uccella S; Bogani G; Sturla D; Serati M; Bolis P
Surg Innov; 2013 Oct; 20(5):493-501. PubMed ID: 23339145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy: a retrospective study].
Ju XZ; Li ZT; Yang HJ; Wu XH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):605-9. PubMed ID: 20003790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Anatomical consideration for the technique of nerve-sparing during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer].
Balaya V; Ngo C; Rossi L; Cornou C; Bensaid C; Douard R; Bats AS; Lecuru F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2016 Sep; 44(9):517-25. PubMed ID: 27568405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-Term Morbidity and Quality of Life in Cervical Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison Between Surgery and Radiotherapy as Primary Treatment.
Derks M; van Lonkhuijzen LR; Bakker RM; Stiggelbout AM; de Kroon CD; Westerveld H; Roovers JP; Kenter GG; Ter Kuile MM
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Feb; 27(2):350-356. PubMed ID: 27984376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
