265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28498485)
1. Transient Recharge Estimability Through Field-Scale Groundwater Model Calibration.
Knowling MJ; Werner AD
Ground Water; 2017 Nov; 55(6):827-840. PubMed ID: 28498485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of modeled recharge distribution on simulated groundwater availability and capture.
Tillman FD; Pool DR; Leake SA
Ground Water; 2015; 53(3):378-88. PubMed ID: 24841767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Highly parameterized inversion of groundwater reactive transport for a complex field site.
Carniato L; Schoups G; van de Giesen N; Seuntjens P; Bastiaens L; Sapion H
J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Feb; 173():38-58. PubMed ID: 25528244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Joint Estimation of Gross Recharge, Groundwater Usage, and Hydraulic Properties within HydroSight.
Peterson TJ; Fulton S
Ground Water; 2019 Nov; 57(6):860-876. PubMed ID: 31569268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Numerical assessments of recharge-dominated groundwater flow and transport in the nearshore reclamation area in western Taiwan.
Ni CF; Li WC; Hsu SM; Lee IH; Lin CP
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Jan; 191(2):83. PubMed ID: 30659403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modelling of recharge and pollutant fluxes to urban groundwaters.
Thomas A; Tellam J
Sci Total Environ; 2006 May; 360(1-3):158-79. PubMed ID: 16325236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the interpretation of recharge estimates from steady-state model calibrations.
Anderson WP; Evans DG
Ground Water; 2007; 45(4):499-505. PubMed ID: 17600581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hydrogeological conditions of a crystalline aquifer: simulation of optimal abstraction rates under scenarios of reduced recharge.
Yidana SM; Fynn OF; Chegbeleh LP; Nude PM; Asiedu DK
ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():606375. PubMed ID: 24453882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling the groundwater recharge in karst aquifers by using a reservoir model.
Ke T; Shu L; Chen X
Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(2):406-12. PubMed ID: 23863435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Groundwater recharge rate and zone structure estimation using PSOLVER algorithm.
Ayvaz MT; Elçi A
Ground Water; 2014; 52(3):434-47. PubMed ID: 23746002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An Analytical Method for Assessing Recharge Using Groundwater Travel Time in Dupuit-Forchheimer Aquifers.
Chesnaux R; Santoni S; Garel E; Huneau F
Ground Water; 2018 Nov; 56(6):986-992. PubMed ID: 29732535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Groundwater recharge estimation using HYDRUS 1D model in Alaşehir sub-basin of Gediz Basin in Turkey.
Tonkul S; Baba A; Şimşek C; Durukan S; Demirkesen AC; Tayfur G
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Sep; 191(10):610. PubMed ID: 31486893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hydrological components of groundwater recharge in leaky aquifers adjacent to semipervious streambank: analytical study.
Mahdavi A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(17):24833-24848. PubMed ID: 34826081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of linking a soil-water-balance model with a groundwater-flow model.
Stanton JS; Ryter DW; Peterson SM
Ground Water; 2013; 51(4):613-22. PubMed ID: 23036222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quasi-Saturated Layer: Implications for Estimating Recharge and Groundwater Modeling.
Gonçalves RD; Teramoto EH; Engelbrecht BZ; Alfaro Soto MA; Chang HK; van Genuchten MT
Ground Water; 2020 May; 58(3):432-440. PubMed ID: 31187874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ecohydrologic process modeling of mountain block groundwater recharge.
Magruder IA; Woessner WW; Running SW
Ground Water; 2009; 47(6):774-85. PubMed ID: 19702780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Groundwater recharge at five representative sites in the Hebei Plain, China.
Lu X; Jin M; van Genuchten MT; Wang B
Ground Water; 2011; 49(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 20100294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conceptualization and Calibration of Anisotropic Alluvial Systems: Pitfalls and Biases.
Gianni G; Doherty J; Brunner P
Ground Water; 2019 May; 57(3):409-419. PubMed ID: 29862498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors influencing streambed hydraulic conductivity and their implications on stream-aquifer interaction: a conceptual review.
Naganna SR; Deka PC; Ch S; Hansen WF
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Nov; 24(32):24765-24789. PubMed ID: 28988330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing uncertainty in calibrating aquifer flow model with multiple scales of heterogeneity.
Zhang Y
Ground Water; 2014; 52(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 24749908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
