331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28498790)
41. Prognostic value of metabolic parameters determined by preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma.
Lee HJ; Lee JJ; Park JY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Jul; 28(4):e43. PubMed ID: 28541634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Reliability of
Jena A; Taneja S; Singh A; Negi P; Sarin R; Das PK; Singhal M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):662-670. PubMed ID: 28678576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Predictive Value of
Song BI; Kim HW; Won KS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):2174-2181. PubMed ID: 28432480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Standardized uptake value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for prediction of tumor recurrence in breast cancer beyond tumor burden.
Ahn SG; Park JT; Lee HM; Lee HW; Jeon TJ; Han K; Lee SA; Dong SM; Ryu YH; Son EJ; Jeong J
Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(6):502. PubMed ID: 25551703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Prognostic value of total lesion glycolysis on preoperative
Lee JW; Heo EJ; Moon SH; Lee H; Cheon GJ; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH
Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):4148-4154. PubMed ID: 26883331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Prognostic evaluation of percentage variation of metabolic tumor burden calculated by dual-phase (18) FDG PET-CT imaging in patients with head and neck cancer.
Abgral R; Valette G; Robin P; Rousset J; Keromnes N; Le Roux PY; Marianowski R; Salaün PY
Head Neck; 2016 Apr; 38 Suppl 1():E600-6. PubMed ID: 25786981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Diffusion-weighted imaging and (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer: Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient and maximum standardized uptake values with prognostic factors.
Karan B; Pourbagher A; Torun N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1434-44. PubMed ID: 26663655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Harmonized pretreatment quantitative volume-based
Kitajima K; Miyoshi Y; Sekine T; Takei H; Ito K; Suto A; Kaida H; Daisaki H; Yamakado K
Hell J Nucl Med; 2020; 23(3):272-289. PubMed ID: 33367302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT parameters in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhu D; Wang L; Zhang H; Chen J; Wang Y; Byanju S; Liao M
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Aug; 96(33):e7813. PubMed ID: 28816978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Role of FDG-PET/CT in evaluating surgical outcomes of operable breast cancer--usefulness for malignant grade of triple-negative breast cancer.
Ohara M; Shigematsu H; Tsutani Y; Emi A; Masumoto N; Ozaki S; Kadoya T; Okada M
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):958-63. PubMed ID: 23756383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Assessment of biological and clinical aggressiveness of invasive ductal breast cancer using baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT-derived volumetric parameters.
Ege Aktas G; Taştekin E; Sarikaya A
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jan; 39(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 29135722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Association between semiquantitative PET parameters and molecular subtypes of breast invasive ductal carcinoma.
Chiacchio S; Evangelista L; Alsharif A; Manca G; DI Martino F; Negri A; Tredici M; Cervino AR; Puccini G; Filidei E; Ghilli M; Naccarato AG; Roncella M; Volterrani D
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Mar; 62(1):101-111. PubMed ID: 26329496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The maximum standardized uptake value of metastatic site in 18 F-FDG PET/CT predicts molecular subtypes and survival in metastatic breast cancer: An Izmir Oncology Group study.
Cokmert S; Tanriverdi O; Karapolat I; Demir L; Bayoglu V; Can A; Akyol M; Yilmaz Y; Oktay Tarhan M
J BUON; 2016; 21(6):1410-1418. PubMed ID: 28039701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54.
Mi L; Zhao Y; Zhao X; Yin F; Yin X; Li N; Shi J; Han X; Duan X; Zhao M; Han G; Wang J
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2021 Oct; 36(8):662-671. PubMed ID: 32783634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis from ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in lymph node metastases and risk stratification of endometrial carcinoma.
Liu DD; Li J; Li X; Xie L; Qin L; Peng F; Cheng MH
J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 30(6):e89. PubMed ID: 31576685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Prognostic impact of
Park HL; Lee SW; Hong JH; Lee J; Lee A; Kwon SJ; Park SY; Yoo IR
Cancer Imaging; 2023 Jan; 23(1):2. PubMed ID: 36600314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Heterogeneity index evaluated by slope of linear regression on
Kim YI; Kim YJ; Paeng JC; Cheon GJ; Lee DS; Chung JK; Kang KW
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Nov; 44(12):1995-2003. PubMed ID: 28634684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Correlation between 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/computed Tomography and Clinicopathological Features in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast.
Ito M; Shien T; Kaji M; Mizoo T; Iwamoto T; Nogami T; Motoki T; Taira N; Doihara H; Miyoshi S
Acta Med Okayama; 2015; 69(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 26690243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Correlation Between F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Metabolic Parameters and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI-Derived Perfusion Data in Patients with Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma.
Kim TH; Yoon JK; Kang DK; Lee SJ; Jung YS; Yim H; An YS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Nov; 22(12):3866-72. PubMed ID: 25805237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
