These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. BioMaster: An Integrated Database and Analytic Platform to Provide Comprehensive Information About BioBrick Parts. Wang B; Yang H; Sun J; Dou C; Huang J; Guo FB Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():593979. PubMed ID: 33552037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assembly of BioBrick standard biological parts using three antibiotic assembly. Shetty R; Lizarazo M; Rettberg R; Knight TF Methods Enzymol; 2011; 498():311-26. PubMed ID: 21601683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction methods for synthetic biology biobricks' visualization. Yang J; Wang H; Ding H; An N; Alterovitz G BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):47. PubMed ID: 28103789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing DNA assembly based on statistical language modelling. Fang G; Zhang S; Dong Y Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Dec; 45(22):e182. PubMed ID: 29036490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SYMBIOSIS: synthetic manipulable biobricks via orthogonal serine integrase systems. Ba F; Liu Y; Liu WQ; Tian X; Li J Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Mar; 50(5):2973-2985. PubMed ID: 35191490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One primer to rule them all: universal primer that adds BBa_B0034 ribosomal binding site to any coding standard 10 BioBrick. Bryksin AV; Bachman HN; Cooper SW; Balavijayan T; Blackstone RM; Du H; Jenkins JP; Haynes CL; Siemer JL; Fiore VF; Barker TH ACS Synth Biol; 2014 Dec; 3(12):956-9. PubMed ID: 25524097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methylase-assisted subcloning for high throughput BioBrick assembly. Matsumura I PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9841. PubMed ID: 32974095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized BioBrick assembly: a novel DNA assembly method for randomizing and optimizing genetic circuits and metabolic pathways. Sleight SC; Sauro HM ACS Synth Biol; 2013 Sep; 2(9):506-18. PubMed ID: 23841916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measuring the activity of BioBrick promoters using an in vivo reference standard. Kelly JR; Rubin AJ; Davis JH; Ajo-Franklin CM; Cumbers J; Czar MJ; de Mora K; Glieberman AL; Monie DD; Endy D J Biol Eng; 2009 Mar; 3():4. PubMed ID: 19298678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assembly of standardized DNA parts using BioBrick ends in E. coli. Ho-Shing O; Lau KH; Vernon W; Eckdahl TT; Campbell AM Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 852():61-76. PubMed ID: 22328426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. AutoBioCAD: full biodesign automation of genetic circuits. Rodrigo G; Jaramillo A ACS Synth Biol; 2013 May; 2(5):230-6. PubMed ID: 23654253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A biobrick library for cloning custom eukaryotic plasmids. Constante M; Grünberg R; Isalan M PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e23685. PubMed ID: 21901127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measuring the burden of hundreds of BioBricks defines an evolutionary limit on constructability in synthetic biology. Radde N; Mortensen GA; Bhat D; Shah S; Clements JJ; Leonard SP; McGuffie MJ; Mishler DM; Barrick JE bioRxiv; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38645188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Programming languages for circuit design. Pedersen M; Yordanov B Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1244():81-104. PubMed ID: 25487094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]