110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28499302)
21. Computer-assisted implant placement. A case report: treatment of the mandible.
Tardieu PB; Vrielinck L; Escolano E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):599-604. PubMed ID: 12939016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Computer-aided dental implant planning.
Spector L
Dent Clin North Am; 2008 Oct; 52(4):761-75, vi. PubMed ID: 18805228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. One-step reconstruction with a 3D-printed, biomechanically evaluated custom implant after complex pelvic tumor resection.
Wong KC; Kumta SM; Geel NV; Demol J
Comput Aided Surg; 2015; 20(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 26290317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Computer-guided implant placement: 3D planning software, fixed intraoral reference points, and CAD/CAM technology. A case report.
Tahmaseb A; De Clerck R; Wismeijer D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):541-6. PubMed ID: 19587879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Digitally designed surgical guides for placing extraoral implants in the mastoid area.
Van der Meer WJ; Vissink A; Raghoebar GM; Visser A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 22616066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Panoramic images versus three-dimensional planning software for oral implant planning in atrophied posterior maxillary: a clinical radiological study.
Fortin T; Camby E; Alik M; Isidori M; Bouchet H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Apr; 15(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 21477064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 1: diagnostics, imaging, and collaborative accountability.
Rosenfeld AL; Mandelaris GA; Tardieu PB
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Jun; 26(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 16836163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Computed tomography-based planning and three-dimensional modeling for craniofacial implant placement: a technical note.
Kurtulmus H; Cotert HS; Guneri P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):943-6. PubMed ID: 19865636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery.
D'haese J; Ackhurst J; Wismeijer D; De Bruyn H; Tahmaseb A
Periodontol 2000; 2017 Feb; 73(1):121-133. PubMed ID: 28000275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Computer-guided surgery utilizing a computer-milled surgical template.
Klein M; Abrams M
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 13(2):165-9; quiz 170. PubMed ID: 11315436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Reconstruction of Maxillary and Orbital Floor Defect With Free Fibula Flap and Whole Individualized Titanium Mesh Assisted by Computer Techniques.
Fu K; Liu Y; Gao N; Cai J; He W; Qiu W
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Aug; 75(8):1791.e1-1791.e9. PubMed ID: 28463685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A combination of three-dimensional printing and computer-assisted virtual surgical procedure for preoperative planning of acetabular fracture reduction.
Zeng C; Xing W; Wu Z; Huang H; Huang W
Injury; 2016 Oct; 47(10):2223-2227. PubMed ID: 27372187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.
Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Boumans T; de Haan AF; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 23879524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I. The concept.
Lal K; White GS; Morea DN; Wright RF
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 16433652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predictably replacing maxillary incisors with implants using 3-D planning and guided implant surgery.
Wöhrle PS
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2014; 35(10):758-62, 764-6, 768. PubMed ID: 25454529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy evaluation of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in zygomatic implant placement in human cadavers.
Chrcanovic BR; Oliveira DR; Custódio AL
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(5):345-55. PubMed ID: 20545538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. 3D reconstruction of the structure of a residual limb for customising the design of a prosthetic socket.
Shuxian Z; Wanhua Z; Bingheng L
Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jan; 27(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 15604007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study.
Fortin T; Bosson JL; Coudert JL; Isidori M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):886-93. PubMed ID: 14696665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
