334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28499762)
1. Ureteral Wall Thickness as a Preoperative Indicator of Impacted Stones in Patients With Ureteral Stones Undergoing Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.
Yoshida T; Inoue T; Omura N; Okada S; Hamamoto S; Kinoshita H; Matsuda T
Urology; 2017 Aug; 106():45-49. PubMed ID: 28499762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes of primary ureteroscopic lithotripsy: The role of maximum ureteral wall thickness at the site of stone impaction.
Morena T; Vismara Fugini A; Veccia A; Riva M; Peroni A
Urologia; 2024 Feb; 91(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 37491955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The predictive value of ureteral wall area for impacted ureteral stones].
Qi W; Xi JH; Yang XL; Wu W; Xu ZL; Jing JF; Ni DW; Chen Y; Wang W; Zhang YB
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Nov; 101(44):3637-3642. PubMed ID: 34823280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Value of preoperative ureteral wall thickness in prediction of impaction of ureteric stones stratified by size in laser ureteroscopic lithotripsy.
Abdrabuh AM; El-Agamy EI; Elhelaly MA; Abouelgreed TA; Abdel-Al I; Youssof HA; Elatreisy A; Shalkamy O; Elebiary M; Agha M; Tagreda I; Alrefaey A; Elawadey E
BMC Urol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):3. PubMed ID: 36609272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ratio of CT attenuation values of the ureter above/below ureteral stones is a useful preoperative factor for predicting impacted ureteral stones.
Deguchi R; Yamashita S; Iwahashi Y; Muraoka S; Kikkawa K; Kohjimoto Y; Hara I
Urolithiasis; 2022 Oct; 50(5):643-649. PubMed ID: 35976424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ureteral wall thickness as a significant factor in predicting spontaneous passage of ureteral stones of ≤ 10 mm: a preliminary report.
Yoshida T; Inoue T; Taguchi M; Omura N; Kinoshita H; Matsuda T
World J Urol; 2019 May; 37(5):913-919. PubMed ID: 30155728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined removal of stones with resection of concurrent pathologic ureter may be a preferred treatment for impacted ureteral stones with stricture lesions.
Xi Q; Wang S; Ye Z; Liu J
J Endourol; 2009 Feb; 23(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 19220083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors affecting success in the treatment of proximal ureteral stones larger than 1 cm with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in adult patients.
Guler Y; Erbin A; Kafkasli A; Ozmerdiven G
Urolithiasis; 2021 Feb; 49(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 32279108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Prospective Evaluation of the Association of Ureteral Wall Thickness With Intraoperative Stone Impaction in Ureteroscopy.
Rasheed Y; Nazim SM; Mirani KK; Zakaria M; Nasir MB
Cureus; 2023 Mar; 15(3):e35972. PubMed ID: 37041922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in comparison with ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted upper ureteral stones larger than 12 mm.
Shao Y; Wang DW; Lu GL; Shen ZJ
World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1841-5. PubMed ID: 25822707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical factors associated with postoperative hydronephrosis after ureteroscopic lithotripsy.
Kim SW; Ahn JH; Yim SU; Cho YH; Shin BS; Chung HS; Hwang EC; Yu HS; Oh KJ; Kim SO; Jung SI; Kang TW; Kwon DD; Park K
Investig Clin Urol; 2016 Sep; 57(5):343-50. PubMed ID: 27617316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones.
Juan YS; Shen JT; Li CC; Wang CJ; Chuang SM; Huang CH; Wu WJ
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Apr; 24(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 18424357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Could ureteral wall thickness have an impact on the operative and post-operative parameters in ureteroscopic management of proximal ureteral stones?
Sarica K; Eryildirim B; Akdere H; Camur E; Sabuncu K; Elibol O
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2019 Nov; 43(9):474-479. PubMed ID: 31155374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and validation of a preoperative nomogram for predicting patients with impacted ureteral stone: a retrospective analysis.
Wang C; Jin L; Zhao X; Xue B; Zheng M
BMC Urol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):140. PubMed ID: 34620128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical efficacy, safety, and costs of percutaneous occlusive balloon catheter-assisted ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large impacted proximal ureteral calculi: a prospective, randomized study.
Qi S; Li Y; Liu X; Zhang C; Zhang H; Zhang Z; Xu Y
J Endourol; 2014 Sep; 28(9):1064-70. PubMed ID: 24786613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Area of hydronephrosis is a useful predictive factor of impacted ureteral stones.
Iwahashi Y; Kohjimoto Y; Deguchi R; Wakamiya T; Yamashita S; Hara I
Urolithiasis; 2024 Apr; 52(1):56. PubMed ID: 38564028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel model using computed tomography parameters to predict shock wave lithotripsy success in ureteral stones at different locations.
Akkaş F; Culha MG; Ayten A; Danacıoğlu YO; Yildiz Ö; İnci E; Guner E; Şahin S
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022 Mar; 46(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 35184987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional mean stone density on non-contrast computed tomography can predict ureteroscopic lithotripsy outcome in ureteral stone cases.
Yamashita S; Iwahashi Y; Deguchi R; Kikkawa K; Kohjimoto Y; Hara I
Urolithiasis; 2020 Dec; 48(6):547-552. PubMed ID: 31993690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computed tomography-based novel prediction model for the stone-free rate of ureteroscopic lithotripsy.
Kim JW; Chae JY; Kim JW; Oh MM; Park HS; Moon du G; Yoon CY
Urolithiasis; 2014 Feb; 42(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 24162952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictive value of ureteral wall thickness (UWT) assessment on the success of internal ureteral stent insertion in cases with obstructing ureteral calculi.
Sarica K; Eryildirim B; Akdere H; Karagoz MA; Karaca Y; Sahan A
Urolithiasis; 2021 Aug; 49(4):359-365. PubMed ID: 33388820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
