These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28499839)

  • 1. Does emotion change auditory prediction and deviance detection?
    Pinheiro AP; Barros C; Dias M; Niznikiewicz M
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Jul; 127():123-133. PubMed ID: 28499839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The selective processing of emotional visual stimuli while detecting auditory targets: an ERP analysis.
    Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Bublatzky F; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():168-76. PubMed ID: 18662679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The representation of unattended, segmented sounds: a mismatch negativity (MMN) study.
    Weise A; Ritter W; Schröger E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Aug; 81(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 21600937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the auditory sensory memory sensitive to visual information?
    Besle J; Fort A; Giard MH
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):337-44. PubMed ID: 16041497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biased relevance filtering in the auditory system: A test of confidence-weighted first-impressions.
    Mullens D; Winkler I; Damaso K; Heathcote A; Whitson L; Provost A; Todd J
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Mar; 115():101-11. PubMed ID: 26844870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Negative emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing.
    Domínguez-Borràs J; Garcia-Garcia M; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 18287956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Event-related brain potentials to change in the frequency and temporal structure of sounds in typically developing 5-6-year-old children.
    Ervast L; Hämäläinen JA; Zachau S; Lohvansuu K; Heinänen K; Veijola M; Heikkinen E; Suominen K; Luotonen M; Lehtihalmes M; Leppänen PH
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Dec; 98(3 Pt 1):413-25. PubMed ID: 26342552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional modulation in the detection of irrelevant deviance: a simultaneous ERP/fMRI study.
    Sabri M; Liebenthal E; Waldron EJ; Medler DA; Binder JR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May; 18(5):689-700. PubMed ID: 16768370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Music-induced positive mood broadens the scope of auditory attention.
    Putkinen V; Makkonen T; Eerola T
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 12(7):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 28460035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comprehensive auditory discrimination profiles recorded with a fast parametric musical multi-feature mismatch negativity paradigm.
    Vuust P; Liikala L; Näätänen R; Brattico P; Brattico E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Apr; 127(4):2065-77. PubMed ID: 26818879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phasic boosting of auditory perception by visual emotion.
    Selinger L; Domínguez-Borràs J; Escera C
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Dec; 94(3):471-8. PubMed ID: 24060548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automatic detection of unattended changes in room acoustics.
    Frey JD; Wendt M; Jacobsen T
    Neurosci Lett; 2015 Jan; 584():162-7. PubMed ID: 25301567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deviance-Related Responses along the Auditory Hierarchy: Combined FFR, MLR and MMN Evidence.
    Shiga T; Althen H; Cornella M; Zarnowiec K; Yabe H; Escera C
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0136794. PubMed ID: 26348628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of frequency deviance direction on performance and mismatch negativity.
    Karanasiou IS; Papageorgiou C; Kyprianou M; Tsianaka EI; Matsopoulos GK; Ventouras EM; Uzunoglu NK
    J Integr Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 10(4):525-36. PubMed ID: 22262539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The human brain maintains contradictory and redundant auditory sensory predictions.
    Pieszek M; Widmann A; Gruber T; Schröger E
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e53634. PubMed ID: 23308266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is laughter a better vocal change detector than a growl?
    Pinheiro AP; Barros C; Vasconcelos M; Obermeier C; Kotz SA
    Cortex; 2017 Jul; 92():233-248. PubMed ID: 28521155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When sound and picture do not fit: Mismatch negativity and sensory interaction.
    Ullsperger P; Erdmann U; Freude G; Dehoff W
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 16290115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.