These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28499846)

  • 1. Methodological quality is underrated in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in health psychology.
    Oliveras I; Losilla JM; Vives J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():59-70. PubMed ID: 28499846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three risk of bias tools lead to opposite conclusions in observational research synthesis.
    Losilla JM; Oliveras I; Marin-Garcia JA; Vives J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 101():61-72. PubMed ID: 29864541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis.
    Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S
    J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
    Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
    Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in treating knee osteoarthritis: assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews with ROBIS tool.
    Xing D; Wang B; Zhang W; Yang Z; Hou Y; Chen Y; Lin J
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2017 Nov; 20(11):1658-1673. PubMed ID: 29044993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Non-Randomized Studies of Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Thiazolidinediones and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Application of a New Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
    Bilandzic A; Fitzpatrick T; Rosella L; Henry D
    PLoS Med; 2016 Apr; 13(4):e1001987. PubMed ID: 27046153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Epidemiology characteristics, reporting characteristics, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on traditional Chinese medicine nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Yang M; Jiang L; Wang A; Xu G
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 28004476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High and unclear risk of bias assessments are predominant in diagnostic accuracy studies included in Cochrane reviews.
    Di Girolamo N; Winter A; Meursinge Reynders R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 101():73-78. PubMed ID: 29777798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
    DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology--a systematic review.
    Lundh A; Knijnenburg SL; Jørgensen AW; van Dalen EC; Kremer LC
    Cancer Treat Rev; 2009 Dec; 35(8):645-52. PubMed ID: 19836897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How do systematic reviews of acupuncture for pain relief incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis? A methodological study.
    Li XQ; Tao KM; Yang GL; Zhou QH; Ling CQ
    Acupunct Med; 2016 Apr; 34(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 26526002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies in dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Listl S; Giannakopoulos NN
    Vet J; 2012 May; 192(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21924652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How do systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study.
    Katikireddi SV; Egan M; Petticrew M
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2015 Feb; 69(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 25481532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methods to systematically review and meta-analyse observational studies: a systematic scoping review of recommendations.
    Mueller M; D'Addario M; Egger M; Cevallos M; Dekkers O; Mugglin C; Scott P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):44. PubMed ID: 29783954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.