These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28500432)

  • 1. Quality and readability of online information resources on insomnia.
    Ma Y; Yang AC; Duan Y; Dong M; Yeung AS
    Front Med; 2017 Sep; 11(3):423-431. PubMed ID: 28500432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transoral robotic surgery: Differences between online information and academic literature.
    Shetty KR; Wong K; Hashemi S; Shetty A; Levi JR
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2020; 41(4):102395. PubMed ID: 32008838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.
    Cisu TI; Mingin GC; Baskin LS
    J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Feb; 15(1):40.e1-40.e6. PubMed ID: 30449679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.
    Storino A; Castillo-Angeles M; Watkins AA; Vargas C; Mancias JD; Bullock A; Demirjian A; Moser AJ; Kent TS
    JAMA Surg; 2016 Sep; 151(9):831-7. PubMed ID: 27144966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical Analysis of the Quality, Readability, and Technical Aspects of Online Information Provided for Neck-Lifts.
    Rayess H; Zuliani GF; Gupta A; Svider PF; Folbe AJ; Eloy JA; Carron MA
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Mar; 19(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 27812680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy and Readability of Websites on Kidney and Bladder Cancers.
    Azer SA; Alghofaili MM; Alsultan RM; Alrumaih NS
    J Cancer Educ; 2018 Aug; 33(4):926-944. PubMed ID: 28281091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the readability, quality and accuracy of online health information for patients with low anterior resection syndrome following surgery for rectal cancer.
    Garfinkle R; Wong-Chong N; Petrucci A; Sylla P; Wexner SD; Bhatnagar S; Morin N; Boutros M
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 May; 21(5):523-531. PubMed ID: 30609222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
    Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The readability and reliability of online information about adenoidectomy.
    Ahmadi O; Wood AJ
    J Laryngol Otol; 2021 Nov; 135(11):976-980. PubMed ID: 34392845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interactivity, Quality, and Content of Websites Promoting Health Behaviors During Infancy: 6-Year Update of the Systematic Assessment.
    Jawad D; Cheng H; Wen LM; Rissel C; Baur L; Mihrshahi S; Taki S
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Oct; 24(10):e38641. PubMed ID: 36206031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Web-based information on the treatment of oral leukoplakia - quality and readability.
    Wiriyakijja P; Fedele S; Porter S; Ni Riordain R
    J Oral Pathol Med; 2016 Sep; 45(8):617-20. PubMed ID: 27233229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Systematic Assessment of Google Search Queries and Readability of Online Gynecologic Oncology Patient Education Materials.
    Martin A; Stewart JR; Gaskins J; Medlin E
    J Cancer Educ; 2019 Jun; 34(3):435-440. PubMed ID: 29353371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of online information on breast cancer treatment options.
    Arif N; Ghezzi P
    Breast; 2018 Feb; 37():6-12. PubMed ID: 29040893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality and readability of online information on ankylosing spondylitis.
    Kocyigit BF; Koca TT; Akaltun MS
    Clin Rheumatol; 2019 Nov; 38(11):3269-3274. PubMed ID: 31372852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How evidence-based is the information on the internet about nausea and vomiting of pregnancy?
    Sacks S; Abenhaim HA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Aug; 35(8):697-703. PubMed ID: 24007704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Quality, Readability, Completeness, and Accuracy of PTSD Websites for Firefighters.
    Killip SC; Kwong NKR; MacDermid JC; Fletcher AJ; Carleton NR
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(20):. PubMed ID: 33086772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy- Let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information.
    Lynch NP; Lang B; Angelov S; McGarrigle SA; Boyle TJ; Al-Azawi D; Connolly EM
    Breast; 2017 Apr; 32():126-129. PubMed ID: 28178606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Voice Disorders.
    Dueppen AJ; Bellon-Harn ML; Radhakrishnan N; Manchaiah V
    J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):290-296. PubMed ID: 29254598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Headache" Online Information: An Evaluation of Readability, Quality, Credibility, and Content.
    Bukhari A; Alshihri S; Abualenain M; Barton J; Kupsky G; Pines JM; Pourmand A
    Perm J; 2021 May; 25():. PubMed ID: 33970074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.