These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28500489)

  • 1. Population-based study of grade progression in patients who harboured Gleason 3 + 3.
    Sampurno F; Earnest A; Millar J; Frydenberg M; Murphy D; Delprado W; Evans S
    World J Urol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):1689-1699. PubMed ID: 28500489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.
    Bokhorst LP; Valdagni R; Rannikko A; Kakehi Y; Pickles T; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
    Eur Urol; 2016 Dec; 70(6):954-960. PubMed ID: 27329565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Confirmatory Biopsy for Initiating Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.
    Jayadevan R; Felker ER; Kwan L; Barsa DE; Zhang H; Sisk AE; Delfin M; Marks LS
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911019. PubMed ID: 31509206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A biopsy-integrated algorithm for determining Gleason 6 upgrading risk stratifies risk of active surveillance failure in prostate cancer.
    Blute ML; Shiau JM; Truong M; Shi F; Abel EJ; Downs TM; Jarrard DF
    World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):729-735. PubMed ID: 27631325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compliance Rates with the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) Protocol and Disease Reclassification in Noncompliers.
    Bokhorst LP; Alberts AR; Rannikko A; Valdagni R; Pickles T; Kakehi Y; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Nov; 68(5):814-21. PubMed ID: 26138043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A negative confirmatory biopsy among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer does not protect them from histologic grade progression.
    Wong LM; Alibhai SM; Trottier G; Timilshina N; Van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Lawrentschuk N; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Ferrara S; Margel D; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Toi A; Evans A; Fleshner NE; Finelli A
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):406-13. PubMed ID: 23664820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Long-Term Risks of Metastases in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
    Maggi M; Cowan JE; Fasulo V; Washington SL; Lonergan PE; Sciarra A; Nguyen HG; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1222-1228. PubMed ID: 33157570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Five-year nationwide follow-up study of active surveillance for prostate cancer.
    Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Makarov DV; Bratt O; Bill-Axelson A; Stattin P
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 24993868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
    BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the Four Kallikrein Panel of the 4Kscore for Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer in Men in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.
    Lin DW; Newcomb LF; Brown MD; Sjoberg DD; Dong Y; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Cooperberg M; Dash A; Ellis WJ; Fabrizio M; Gleave ME; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Zheng Y;
    Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):448-454. PubMed ID: 27889277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Refined Analysis of Prostate-specific Antigen Kinetics to Predict Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Outcomes.
    Cooperberg MR; Brooks JD; Faino AV; Newcomb LF; Kearns JT; Carroll PR; Dash A; Etzioni R; Fabrizio MD; Gleave ME; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Lin DW; Zheng Y
    Eur Urol; 2018 Aug; 74(2):211-217. PubMed ID: 29433975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regular transition zone biopsy during active surveillance for prostate cancer may improve detection of pathological progression.
    Wong LM; Toi A; Van der Kwast T; Trottier G; Alibhai SM; Timilshina N; Evans A; Zlotta A; Fleshner N; Finelli A
    J Urol; 2014 Oct; 192(4):1088-93. PubMed ID: 24742593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
    Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
    BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biopsy features associated with prostate cancer progression in active surveillance patients: comparison of three statistical models.
    Iremashvili V; Manoharan M; Rosenberg DL; Soloway MS
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 22564446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A "PSA pyramid" for men with initial prostate-specific antigen ≤3 ng/ml: a plea for individualized prostate cancer screening.
    Randazzo M; Beatrice J; Huber A; Grobholz R; Manka L; Chun FK; Recker F; Kwiatkowski M
    Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):591-7. PubMed ID: 24794075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk Factors for Biopsy Reclassification over Time in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
    Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Zhao S; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
    J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1216-1221. PubMed ID: 32519915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome following active surveillance of men with screen-detected prostate cancer. Results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial.
    Godtman RA; Holmberg E; Khatami A; Stranne J; Hugosson J
    Eur Urol; 2013 Jan; 63(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 22980443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the Optimal Timing for Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Rise After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Fossati N; Karnes RJ; Cozzarini C; Fiorino C; Gandaglia G; Joniau S; Boorjian SA; Goldner G; Hinkelbein W; Haustermans K; Tombal B; Shariat S; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):728-733. PubMed ID: 26497924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors Associated with Time to Conversion from Active Surveillance to Treatment for Prostate Cancer in a Multi-Institutional Cohort.
    Cooley LF; Emeka AA; Meyers TJ; Cooper PR; Lin DW; Finelli A; Eastham JA; Logothetis CJ; Marks LS; Vesprini D; Goldenberg SL; Higano CS; Pavlovich CP; Chan JM; Morgan TM; Klein EA; Barocas DA; Loeb S; Helfand BT; Scholtens DM; Witte JS; Catalona WJ;
    J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1147-1156. PubMed ID: 34503355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.