These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28500580)
21. First worldwide report on Hugo RAS™ surgical platform in right and left colectomy. Bianchi PP; Salaj A; Rocco B; Formisano G Updates Surg; 2023 Apr; 75(3):775-780. PubMed ID: 36897505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. How to reduce the laparoscopic colorectal learning curve. Toledano Trincado M; Sánchez Gonzalez J; Blanco Antona F; Martín Esteban ML; Colao García L; Cuevas Gonzalez J; Mayo Iscar A; Blanco Alvarez JI; Martín del Olmo JC JSLS; 2014; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 25392640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Critical appraisal of learning curve for single incision laparoscopic right colectomy. Haas EM; Nieto J; Ragupathi M; Aminian A; Patel CB Surg Endosc; 2013 Dec; 27(12):4499-503. PubMed ID: 23877765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Safe implementation of robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. Van Eetvelde E; Violon S; Poortmans N; Stijns J; Duinslaeger M; Vanhoeij M; Buyl R; Jacobs-Tulleneers-Thevissen D J Robot Surg; 2023 Jun; 17(3):1071-1076. PubMed ID: 36566471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Suprapubic approach for robotic complete mesocolic excision in right colectomy: Oncologic safety and short-term outcomes of an original technique. Petz W; Ribero D; Bertani E; Borin S; Formisano G; Esposito S; Spinoglio G; Bianchi PP Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2060-2066. PubMed ID: 28912072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Perioperative Outcomes in Correlation to the Learning Curve for Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: The First 109 Cases of our Clinic]. Cordier J; Neisius A; Thomas C; Hampel C; Thüroff JW; Brenner W; Roos FC Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Nov; 46(6):461-6. PubMed ID: 26599952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Initial experience of robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer: a matched case-control study. de'Angelis N; Alghamdi S; Renda A; Azoulay D; Brunetti F World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 13():295. PubMed ID: 26452727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robotic Anatomical Segmentectomy: An Analysis of the Learning Curve. Zhang Y; Liu S; Han Y; Xiang J; Cerfolio RJ; Li H Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 May; 107(5):1515-1522. PubMed ID: 30578780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Jiménez-Rodríguez RM; Díaz-Pavón JM; de la Portilla de Juan F; Prendes-Sillero E; Dussort HC; Padillo J Int J Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jun; 28(6):815-21. PubMed ID: 23242270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A 5-year perspective over robotic general surgery: indications, risk factors and learning curves. Sgarbură O; Tomulescu V; Blajut C; Popescu I Chirurgia (Bucur); 2013; 108(5):599-610. PubMed ID: 24157102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Supervision by a technically qualified surgeon affects the proficiency and safety of laparoscopic colectomy performed by novice surgeons. Ichikawa N; Homma S; Yoshida T; Ohno Y; Kawamura H; Kamiizumi Y; Iijima H; Taketomi A Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):436-442. PubMed ID: 28664430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robotic, laparoscopic, and open colectomy: a case-matched comparison from the ACS-NSQIP. Benlice C; Aytac E; Costedio M; Kessler H; Abbas MA; Remzi FH; Gorgun E Int J Med Robot; 2017 Sep; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 27766727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robotic colectomy: is it necessary? Bertani E; Chiappa A; Ubiali P; Cossu ML; Arnone P; Andreoni B Minerva Chir; 2013 Oct; 68(5):445-56. PubMed ID: 24101002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Totally robotic right colectomy: a preliminary case series and an overview of the literature. Buchs NC; Pugin F; Bucher P; Morel P Int J Med Robot; 2011 Sep; 7(3):348-52. PubMed ID: 21678543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis for malignancy. Kelley SR; Duchalais E; Larson DW J Robot Surg; 2018 Sep; 12(3):461-466. PubMed ID: 29071484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of 30-Day Postoperative Outcomes after Laparoscopic vs Robotic Colectomy. Miller PE; Dao H; Paluvoi N; Bailey M; Margolin D; Shah N; Vargas HD J Am Coll Surg; 2016 Aug; 223(2):369-73. PubMed ID: 27109780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program. Smith AL; Krivak TC; Scott EM; Rauh-Hain JA; Sukumvanich P; Olawaiye AB; Richard SD Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 126(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 22613352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Learning curve for robotic bedside assistance for rectal cancer: application of the cumulative sum method. Yamada K; Kogure N; Ojima H J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1027-1035. PubMed ID: 34779988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome. Cela V; Freschi L; Simi G; Ruggiero M; Tana R; Pluchino N Surg Endosc; 2013 Jul; 27(7):2638-43. PubMed ID: 23392975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. rSILS: initial clinical experience with single-port robotic (SPr) right colectomy. Marks JH; Kunkel E; Salem J; Martin C; Schoonyoung HP; Agarwal S Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Aug; 24(8):817-822. PubMed ID: 32451805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]