These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

703 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28500743)

  • 1. Safety and efficacy of clip-based vs. suture mediated vascular closure for femoral access hemostasis: A prospective randomized single center study comparing the StarClose and the ProGlide device.
    Klein-Wiele O; Baliota M; Kara K; Käunicke M; Schäfer H; Garbrecht M; Abdulghafor M; Garmer M; Hailer B
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):402-407. PubMed ID: 28500743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and effectiveness of a novel vascular closure device: a prospective study of the ExoSeal compared to the Angio-Seal and ProGlide.
    Kara K; Mahabadi AA; Rothe H; Müller P; Krüger J; Neubauer H; Klein-Wiele O; Mügge A; Kahlert P; Erbel R
    J Endovasc Ther; 2014 Dec; 21(6):822-8. PubMed ID: 25453885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sheath Size Up and Down With Single Proglide - A Technique for Achieving Hemostasis With Use of Large Size Delivery System During Endovascular Graft Placement.
    Singh G; Scalise F; Bianchi P; Cireni L; Sorropago G; Casana R; Tolva V
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2022 Jan; 78():190-196. PubMed ID: 34464729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy and safety of the nitinol clip-based vascular closure device (Starclose) for closure of common femoral arterial cannulation at or near the bifurcation: a propensity score-adjusted analysis.
    Bangalore S; Vidi VD; Liu CB; Shah PB; Resnic FS
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2011 May; 23(5):194-9. PubMed ID: 21562348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of the StarClose device for obtaining femoral artery hemostasis.
    Rodriguez A; Katz SG
    Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2011 Oct; 45(7):627-30. PubMed ID: 21646232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of suture-based vascular closure devices in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Barbanti M; Capranzano P; Ohno Y; Gulino S; Sgroi C; Immè S; Tamburino C; Cannata S; Patanè M; Di Stefano D; Todaro D; Di Simone E; Deste W; Gargiulo G; Capodanno D; Grasso C; Tamburino C
    EuroIntervention; 2015 Oct; 11(6):690-7. PubMed ID: 26499222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The safety and efficacy of the StarClose Vascular Closure System: the ultrasound substudy of the CLIP study.
    Jaff MR; Hadley G; Hermiller JB; Simonton C; Hinohara T; Cannon L; Reisman M; Braden G; Fletcher DR; Zapien M; Chou TM; DiDonato K
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Nov; 68(5):684-9. PubMed ID: 17039509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. StarClose vascular closure system (VCS) is safe and effective in patients who ambulate early following successful femoral artery access closure--results from the RISE clinical trial.
    Burke MN; Hermiller J; Jaff MR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jul; 80(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 22162141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Femoral access-related complications during percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation comparing single versus double Prostar XL device closure.
    Saleh N; De Palma R; Settergren M; Rück A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Dec; 86(7):1255-61. PubMed ID: 26332528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FemoSeal
    Gabrielli R; Rosati MS; Millarelli M; Dante A; Maiorano M; Musilli A; Chiappa R; Ventura M
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2018 Aug; 51():18-24. PubMed ID: 29678650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multicenter randomized trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of a novel vascular closure device to manual compression in anticoagulated patients undergoing percutaneous transfemoral procedures: The CELT ACD trial.
    Wong SC; Laule M; Turi Z; Sanad W; Crowley J; Degen H; Bennett K; Coleman JE; Bergman G
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 90(5):756-765. PubMed ID: 28296003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative data of single versus double proglide vascular preclose technique after percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation from the optimized catheter valvular intervention (OCEAN-TAVI) japanese multicenter registry.
    Kodama A; Yamamoto M; Shimura T; Kagase A; Koyama Y; Tada N; Takagi K; Araki M; Yamanaka F; Shirai S; Watanabe Y; Hayashida K
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Sep; 90(3):E55-E62. PubMed ID: 27785881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical experience of StarClose vascular closure device in patients with first and recurrent femoral punctures.
    Tay EL; Co M; Tai BC; Lee YP; Low A; Lim YT; Tan HC; Lee CH
    J Interv Cardiol; 2008 Feb; 21(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 18254789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single suture-mediated closure system after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A single-center real-world experience.
    Iacovelli F; Burattini O; Sturdà F; Branca M; Stabile E; Fimiani L; Salemme L; Cioppa A; Pucciarelli A; Cafaro A; Bortone AS; Contegiacomo G; Pignatelli A; Tesorio T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jun; 103(7):1125-1137. PubMed ID: 38639140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The utility of the StarClose arterial closure device in patients with peripheral arterial disease.
    Gray BH; Miller R; Langan EM; Joels CS; Yasin Y; Kalbaugh CA
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2009; 23(3):341-4. PubMed ID: 18809287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Stopped Pilot Study of the ProGlide Closure Device After Transbrachial Endovascular Interventions.
    Meertens MM; de Haan MW; Schurink GWH; Mees BME
    J Endovasc Ther; 2019 Oct; 26(5):727-731. PubMed ID: 31288644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Network meta-analysis of studies comparing closure devices for femoral access after percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Iannaccone M; Saint-Hilary G; Menardi D; Vadalà P; Bernardi A; Bianco M; Montefusco A; Omedè P; D'Amico S; Piazza F; Scacciatella P; D'Amico M; Moretti C; Biondi-Zoccai G; Gasparini M; Gaita F; D'Ascenzo F
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2018 Oct; 19(10):586-596. PubMed ID: 30045086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Angioseal VIP® vs. StarClose SE® closure devices: a comparative analysis in non-cardiological procedures.
    Lucatelli P; Fanelli F; Cannavale A; Corona M; Cirelli C; D'Adamo A; Salvatori FM; Catalano C
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Feb; 58(1):80-86. PubMed ID: 24309473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of closure strategies after balloon aortic valvuloplasty: suture mediated versus collagen based versus manual.
    Ben-Dor I; Looser P; Bernardo N; Maluenda G; Torguson R; Xue Z; Lindsay J; Pichard AD; Satler LF; Waksman R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jul; 78(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 21681898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors in ProGlide® Vascular Closure Failure in Sheath Arteriotomies Greater than 16 French.
    Chen IM; Lee TH; Chen PL; Shih CC; Chang HH
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2019 Oct; 58(4):615-622. PubMed ID: 31500989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.