BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28500759)

  • 1. A Monte Carlo model for mean glandular dose evaluation in spot compression mammography.
    Sarno A; Dance DR; van Engen RE; Young KC; Russo P; Di Lillo F; Mettivier G; Bliznakova K; Fei B; Sechopoulos I
    Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3848-3860. PubMed ID: 28500759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation dosimetry of a clinical prototype dedicated cone-beam breast CT system with offset detector.
    Tseng HW; Karellas A; Vedantham S
    Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 33501686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry.
    Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Qin X; Fei B; Feng SS
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5050-9. PubMed ID: 22894430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Updated breast CT dose coefficients (DgN
    Hernandez AM; Becker AE; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1455-1466. PubMed ID: 30661250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte Carlo calculation of monoenergetic and polyenergetic DgN coefficients for mean glandular dose estimates in mammography using a homogeneous breast model.
    Sarno A; Tucciariello RM; Mettivier G; di Franco F; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 64(12):125012. PubMed ID: 31141793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
    Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Monte Carlo study of monoenergetic and polyenergetic normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients in mammography.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Di Lillo F; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(1):306-325. PubMed ID: 27991451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.
    Boone JM; Kwan AL; Seibert JA; Shah N; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
    Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3767-76. PubMed ID: 16475776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-layer heterogeneous mammographic phantoms for Monte Carlo simulation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.
    Chang TY; Lai KJ; Tu CY; Wu J
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2234. PubMed ID: 32042071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for flat-panel CT breast imaging.
    Thacker SC; Glick SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Dec; 49(24):5433-44. PubMed ID: 15724534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered.
    Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6337-48. PubMed ID: 26520725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion coefficients for dose estimation in mammography based on a 3D detailed breast model.
    Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Liu H; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2503-2514. PubMed ID: 28295395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography.
    Boone JM; Shah N; Nelson TR
    Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):226-35. PubMed ID: 15000608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data.
    Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):869-75. PubMed ID: 12033583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.
    Sechopoulos I; Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4110-20. PubMed ID: 20879571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients from experimental mammographic x-ray spectra.
    Santos JC; Tomal A; de Barros N; Costa PR
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(10):105010. PubMed ID: 30959490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating energy deposition in glandular tissues for mammography using multiscale Monte Carlo simulations.
    Oliver PAK; Thomson RM
    Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 30657190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Indices for the evaluation of glandular dose heterogeneity in full-field digital mammography.
    Shinohara S; Araki F; Maeda M; Okamoto R; Nakamura M; Higashida Y
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Nov; 40(4):. PubMed ID: 33120368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Suryanarayanan S; Vedantham S; D'Orsi C; Karellas A
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):221-32. PubMed ID: 17278508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.
    Boone JM
    Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 10540637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.