These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28500759)

  • 21. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: Data acquisition strategies based on projection angle-dependent normalized glandular dose coefficients.
    Tseng HW; Karellas A; Vedantham S
    Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1406-1417. PubMed ID: 36427332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of fibroglandular tissue distribution and breast shape in voxelized breast models for dosimetry in mammography.
    Ferrauche G; Tramontin G; Massera RT; Tomal A
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Mar; 68(7):. PubMed ID: 36827710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of photoelectric cross section data on systematic uncertainties for Monte Carlo breast dosimetry in mammography.
    Massera RT; Fernández-Varea JM; Tomal A
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 May; 66(11):. PubMed ID: 33857930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Normalized glandular dose coefficients for digital breast tomosynthesis systems with a homogeneous breast model.
    Sarno A; Tucciariello RM; Mettivier G; Del Sarto D; Fantacci ME; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065024. PubMed ID: 33535193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dataset of patient-derived digital breast phantoms for in silico studies in breast computed tomography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; di Franco F; Varallo A; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
    Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2682-2693. PubMed ID: 33683711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of skin thickness determined using breast CT on mammographic dosimetry.
    Huang SY; Boone JM; Yang K; Kwan AL; Packard NJ
    Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1199-206. PubMed ID: 18491511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Radiation doses in volume-of-interest breast computed tomography--A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Lai CJ; Zhong Y; Yi Y; Wang T; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):3063-75. PubMed ID: 26127058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Air kerma calculation in Monte Carlo simulations for deriving normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(14):N337-N349. PubMed ID: 28452342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Multiscale Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetry in x-ray breast imaging: Part I - Macroscopic scales.
    Massera RT; Tomal A; Thomson RM
    Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1105-1116. PubMed ID: 38156766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mean glandular dose to patients from stereotactic breast biopsy procedures.
    Paixão L; Chevalier M; Hurtado-Romero AE; Garayoa J
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):145008. PubMed ID: 29877195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Real-time estimation system for mean glandular dose in mammography.
    Matsumoto M; Inoue S; Honda I; Yamamoto S; Ueguchi T; Ogata Y; Johkoh T
    Radiat Med; 2003; 21(6):280-4. PubMed ID: 14743903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Skin models and their impact on mean glandular dose in mammography.
    Massera RT; Tomal A
    Phys Med; 2018 Jul; 51():38-47. PubMed ID: 29673742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Estimation of glandular dose in mammography based on artificial neural networks.
    Trevisan Massera R; Tomal A
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 May; 65(9):095009. PubMed ID: 32101806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
    Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
    Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.
    Baptista M; Di Maria S; Barros S; Figueira C; Sarmento M; Orvalho L; Vaz P
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3788-800. PubMed ID: 26133581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation.
    Boone JM; Nelson TR; Lindfors KK; Seibert JA
    Radiology; 2001 Dec; 221(3):657-67. PubMed ID: 11719660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Normalized average glandular dose in magnification mammography.
    Liu B; Goodsitt M; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1995 Oct; 197(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 7568836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Monte Carlo evaluation of glandular dose in cone-beam X-ray computed tomography dedicated to the breast: Homogeneous and heterogeneous breast models.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Tucciariello RM; Bliznakova K; Boone JM; Sechopoulos I; Di Lillo F; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2018 Jul; 51():99-107. PubMed ID: 29885958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization.
    Feng SS; Sechopoulos I
    Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 22332070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial.
    Hendrick RE; Pisano ED; Averbukh A; Moran C; Berns EA; Yaffe MJ; Herman B; Acharyya S; Gatsonis C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Feb; 194(2):362-9. PubMed ID: 20093597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.