144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28501052)
1. Self-ligating Brackets May Not Have Clinical Advantages Over Conventional Brackets for the Periodontal Health of Adolescent Orthodontic Patients.
Shin K
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2017 Jun; 17(2):102-104. PubMed ID: 28501052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative assessment of alignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-ligating vs conventional appliances in adolescents: a single-center randomized controlled trial.
Songra G; Clover M; Atack NE; Ewings P; Sherriff M; Sandy JR; Ireland AJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):569-78. PubMed ID: 24785921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of bracket ligation on the periodontal status of adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Arnold S; Koletsi D; Patcas R; Eliades T
J Dent; 2016 Nov; 54():13-24. PubMed ID: 27546466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Root resorption during orthodontic treatment with self-ligating or conventional brackets: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yi J; Li M; Li Y; Li X; Zhao Z
BMC Oral Health; 2016 Nov; 16(1):125. PubMed ID: 27871255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frictional forces related to self-ligating brackets.
Pizzoni L; Ravnholt G; Melsen B
Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 9699406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Time efficiency of self-ligating vs conventional brackets in orthodontics: effect of appliances and ligating systems.
Paduano S; Cioffi I; Iodice G; Rapuano A; Silva R
Prog Orthod; 2008; 9(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19350061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment efficiency of conventional vs self-ligating brackets: effects of archwire size and material.
Turnbull NR; Birnie DJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):395-9. PubMed ID: 17346597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of white spot lesion formation between a self-ligating bracket and a conventional preadjusted straight wire bracket.
Polat Ö; Gökçelik A; Arman A; Arhun N
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):e46-50. PubMed ID: 19641768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Microbial colonisation associated with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a systematic review.
Parmar NP; Thompson GL; Atack NE; Ireland AJ; Sherriff M; Haworth JA
J Orthod; 2022 Jun; 49(2):151-162. PubMed ID: 34839734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the efficacy of tooth alignment among lingual and labial brackets: an in vitro study.
Alobeid A; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Keilig L; Cornelius D; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Nov; 40(6):660-665. PubMed ID: 29546390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of self-ligating and conventional brackets on halitosis and periodontal conditions.
Kaygisiz E; Uzuner FD; Yuksel S; Taner L; Çulhaoğlu R; Sezgin Y; Ateş C
Angle Orthod; 2015 May; 85(3):468-73. PubMed ID: 25101909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vitro study into the efficacy of complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 25264808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of friction forces between stainless steel wires and "reduced-friction" self-ligating brackets.
Reznikov N; Har-Zion G; Barkana I; Abed Y; Redlich M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 20816303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prevalence and type of pain during conventional and self-ligating orthodontic treatment.
Tecco S; D'Attilio M; Tetè S; Festa F
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):380-4. PubMed ID: 19465738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.
Read-Ward GE; Jones SP; Davies EH
Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9459030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Force loss in archwire-guided tooth movement of conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 23382468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts.
Henao SP; Kusy RP
Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 15132446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical properties of coated superelastic archwires in conventional and self-ligating orthodontic brackets.
Elayyan F; Silikas N; Bearn D
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):213-7. PubMed ID: 20152677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.
Szczupakowski A; Reimann S; Dirk C; Keilig L; Weber A; Jäger A; Bourauel C
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):287-95. PubMed ID: 27220902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics. A systematic review.
Fleming PS; Johal A
Angle Orthod; 2010 May; 80(3):575-84. PubMed ID: 20050755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
