467 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28502196)
1. Pendulum and modified pendulum appliances for maxillary molar distalization in Class II malocclusion - a systematic review.
Al-Thomali Y; Basha S; Mohamed RN
Acta Odontol Scand; 2017 Aug; 75(6):394-401. PubMed ID: 28502196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance.
Fuziy A; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Janson G; Angelieri F; Pinzan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):502-10. PubMed ID: 17045150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maxillary molar distalization with miniscrew-supported appliances in Class II malocclusion: A systematic review.
Mohamed RN; Basha S; Al-Thomali Y
Angle Orthod; 2018 Jul; 88(4):494-502. PubMed ID: 29664335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficiency of the skeletonized Pendulum K appliance for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization : A clinical pilot study.
Kinzinger GSM; Hourfar J; Lisson JA
J Orofac Orthop; 2021 Nov; 82(6):391-402. PubMed ID: 33651171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance.
Kircelli BH; Pektaş ZO; Kircelli C
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):650-9. PubMed ID: 16808573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Molar distalization with pendulum appliances in the mixed dentition: effects on the position of unerupted canines and premolars.
Kinzinger GS; Wehrbein H; Gross U; Diedrich PR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):407-17. PubMed ID: 16527638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maxillary molar distalization with noncompliance intramaxillary appliances in Class II malocclusion. A systematic review.
Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1133-40. PubMed ID: 18947282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage.
Polat-Ozsoy O; Kircelli BH; Arman-Ozçirpici A; Pektaş ZO; Uçkan S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):339.e9-339.e17. PubMed ID: 18331928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Maxillary molar distalization: Pendulum and Fast-Back, comparison between two approaches for Class II malocclusion.
Caprioglio A; Beretta M; Lanteri C
Prog Orthod; 2011; 12(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 21515227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.
Chiu PP; McNamara JA; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 16168332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.
Caprioglio A; Cozzani M; Fontana M
Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):49. PubMed ID: 25139288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distalization of maxillary molars with the bone-supported pendulum: a clinical study.
Escobar SA; Tellez PA; Moncada CA; Villegas CA; Latorre CM; Oberti G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):545-9. PubMed ID: 17418723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
Papadopoulos MA; Melkos AB; Athanasiou AE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalization.
Kinzinger GS; Gülden N; Yildizhan F; Diedrich PR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):578-86. PubMed ID: 19815162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anchorage quality of deciduous molars versus premolars for molar distalization with a pendulum appliance.
Kinzinger GS; Gross U; Fritz UB; Diedrich PR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):314-23. PubMed ID: 15775946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.
Bussick TJ; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Osseointegrated implants with pendulum springs for maxillary molar distalization: a cephalometric study.
Onçağ G; Seçkin O; Dinçer B; Arikan F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 17208102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Angelieri F; Almeida RR; Almeida MR; Fuziy A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 16627178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
