These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28502406)
1. Steering the conversation: A linguistic exploration of natural language interactions with a digital assistant during simulated driving. Large DR; Clark L; Quandt A; Burnett G; Skrypchuk L Appl Ergon; 2017 Sep; 63():53-61. PubMed ID: 28502406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. IvCDS: An End-to-End Driver Simulator for Personal In-Vehicle Conversational Assistant. Ji T; Yin X; Cheng P; Zhou L; Liu S; Bao W; Lyu C Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 36497568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exploring the effectiveness of a digital voice assistant to maintain driver alertness in partially automated vehicles. Mahajan K; Large DR; Burnett G; Velaga NR Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(5):378-383. PubMed ID: 33881365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating secondary input devices to support an automotive touchscreen HMI: A cross-cultural simulator study conducted in the UK and China. Large DR; Burnett G; Crundall E; Lawson G; Skrypchuk L; Mouzakitis A Appl Ergon; 2019 Jul; 78():184-196. PubMed ID: 31046950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Designing a spoken dialogue interface to an intelligent cognitive assistant for people with dementia. Wolters MK; Kelly F; Kilgour J Health Informatics J; 2016 Dec; 22(4):854-866. PubMed ID: 26276794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of conversation on situation awareness and working memory in simulated driving. Heenan A; Herdman CM; Brown MS; Robert N Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1077-92. PubMed ID: 25277018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech-based E-mail and driver behavior: effects of an in-vehicle message system interface. Jamson AH; Westerman SJ; Hockey GR; Carsten OM Hum Factors; 2004; 46(4):625-39. PubMed ID: 15709325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of communication style, anthropomorphic setting and individual differences on older adults using voice assistants in a health context. Zhong R; Ma M BMC Geriatr; 2022 Sep; 22(1):751. PubMed ID: 36104775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. User acceptance of cooperative maneuver-based driving--a summary of three studies. Kauer M; Franz B; Schreiber M; Bruder R; Geyer S Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4258-64. PubMed ID: 22317374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Driving without wings: The effect of different digital mirror locations on the visual behaviour, performance and opinions of drivers. Large DR; Crundall E; Burnett G; Harvey C; Konstantopoulos P Appl Ergon; 2016 Jul; 55():138-148. PubMed ID: 26995044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing. Wang Y; Mehler B; Reimer B; Lammers V; D'Ambrosio LA; Coughlin JF Ergonomics; 2010 Mar; 53(3):404-20. PubMed ID: 20191415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of different navigation voices on trust and attention while using in-vehicle navigation systems. Large DR; Burnett GE J Safety Res; 2014 Jun; 49():69-75. PubMed ID: 24913489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Why do drivers maintain short headways in fog? A driving-simulator study evaluating feeling of risk and lateral control during automated and manual car following. Saffarian M; Happee R; Winter JC Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):971-85. PubMed ID: 22804738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Effect of Multimodal Emotional Expression on Responses to a Digital Human during a Self-Disclosure Conversation: a Computational Analysis of User Language. Loveys K; Sagar M; Broadbent E J Med Syst; 2020 Jul; 44(9):143. PubMed ID: 32700060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Noncritical State Transitions During Conditionally Automated Driving on German Freeways: Effects of Non-Driving Related Tasks on Takeover Time and Takeover Quality. Naujoks F; Purucker C; Wiedemann K; Marberger C Hum Factors; 2019 Jun; 61(4):596-613. PubMed ID: 30689440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychomotor disturbance in depression: assessment using a driving simulator paradigm. Bulmash EL; Moller HJ; Kayumov L; Shen J; Wang X; Shapiro CM J Affect Disord; 2006 Jul; 93(1-3):213-8. PubMed ID: 16522332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Providing views of the driving scene to drivers' conversation partners mitigates cell-phone-related distraction. Gaspar JG; Street WN; Windsor MB; Carbonari R; Kaczmarski H; Kramer AF; Mathewson KE Psychol Sci; 2014 Dec; 25(12):2136-46. PubMed ID: 25304886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fuzzylot: a novel self-organising fuzzy-neural rule-based pilot system for automated vehicles. Pasquier M; Quek C; Toh M Neural Netw; 2001 Oct; 14(8):1099-112. PubMed ID: 11681754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Driving Performance After Self-Regulated Control Transitions in Highly Automated Vehicles. Eriksson A; Stanton NA Hum Factors; 2017 Dec; 59(8):1233-1248. PubMed ID: 28902526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of cognitive and visual loads on driving performance after take-over request (TOR) in automated driving. Choi D; Sato T; Ando T; Abe T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S Appl Ergon; 2020 May; 85():103074. PubMed ID: 32174362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]