These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28502726)

  • 1. Utility of NIST Whole-Genome Reference Materials for the Technical Validation of a Multigene Next-Generation Sequencing Test.
    Shum BOV; Henner I; Belluoccio D; Hinchcliffe MJ
    J Mol Diagn; 2017 Jul; 19(4):602-612. PubMed ID: 28502726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical implications of technical accuracy in genome sequencing.
    Goldfeder RL; Priest JR; Zook JM; Grove ME; Waggott D; Wheeler MT; Salit M; Ashley EA
    Genome Med; 2016 Mar; 8(1):24. PubMed ID: 26932475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Model Study of In Silico Proficiency Testing for Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing.
    Duncavage EJ; Abel HJ; Merker JD; Bodner JB; Zhao Q; Voelkerding KV; Pfeifer JD
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Oct; 140(10):1085-91. PubMed ID: 27388684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low-Pass Genome Sequencing: Validation and Diagnostic Utility from 409 Clinical Cases of Low-Pass Genome Sequencing for the Detection of Copy Number Variants to Replace Constitutional Microarray.
    Chaubey A; Shenoy S; Mathur A; Ma Z; Valencia CA; Reddy Nallamilli BR; Szekeres E; Stansberry L; Liu R; Hegde MR
    J Mol Diagn; 2020 Jun; 22(6):823-840. PubMed ID: 32344035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and interlaboratory evaluation of a NIST Reference Material RM 8366 for EGFR and MET gene copy number measurements.
    He HJ; Das B; Cleveland MH; Chen L; Camalier CE; Liu LC; Norman KL; Fellowes AP; McEvoy CR; Lund SP; Almeida J; Steffen CR; Karlovich C; Williams PM; Cole KD
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 Jul; 57(8):1142-1152. PubMed ID: 31112502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of OncoPanel: A Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Assay for the Detection of Somatic Variants in Cancer.
    Garcia EP; Minkovsky A; Jia Y; Ducar MD; Shivdasani P; Gong X; Ligon AH; Sholl LM; Kuo FC; MacConaill LE; Lindeman NI; Dong F
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Jun; 141(6):751-758. PubMed ID: 28557599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance Characteristics of a Targeted Sequencing Platform for Simultaneous Detection of Single Nucleotide Variants, Insertions/Deletions, Copy Number Alterations, and Gene Fusions in Cancer Genome.
    Park K; Tran H; Eng KW; Ramazanoglu S; Marrero Rolon RM; Scognamiglio T; Borczuk A; Mosquera JM; Pan Q; Sboner A; Rubin MA; Elemento O; Rennert H; Fernandes H; Song W
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2020 Dec; 144(12):1535-1546. PubMed ID: 32045275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of NIST human mitochondrial DNA SRM-2392 and SRM-2392-I standard reference materials by next generation sequencing.
    Riman S; Kiesler KM; Borsuk LA; Vallone PM
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():181-192. PubMed ID: 28460352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Archived neonatal dried blood spot samples can be used for accurate whole genome and exome-targeted next-generation sequencing.
    Hollegaard MV; Grauholm J; Nielsen R; Grove J; Mandrup S; Hougaard DM
    Mol Genet Metab; 2013; 110(1-2):65-72. PubMed ID: 23830478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Ion Personal Genome Machine Platforms for the Detection of Variants in
    Hwang SM; Lee KC; Lee MS; Park KU
    Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 50(1):255-264. PubMed ID: 28392550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Creation of an Expert Curated Variant List for Clinical Genomic Test Development and Validation: A ClinGen and GeT-RM Collaborative Project.
    Wilcox E; Harrison SM; Lockhart E; Voelkerding K; Lubin IM; ; Rehm HL; Kalman LV; Funke B
    J Mol Diagn; 2021 Nov; 23(11):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 34384894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Next-generation sequencing using a pre-designed gene panel for the molecular diagnosis of congenital disorders in pediatric patients.
    Lim EC; Brett M; Lai AH; Lee SP; Tan ES; Jamuar SS; Ng IS; Tan EC
    Hum Genomics; 2015 Dec; 9():33. PubMed ID: 26666243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and Validation of Clinical Whole-Exome and Whole-Genome Sequencing for Detection of Germline Variants in Inherited Disease.
    Hegde M; Santani A; Mao R; Ferreira-Gonzalez A; Weck KE; Voelkerding KV
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Jun; 141(6):798-805. PubMed ID: 28362156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical Validation of a Next-Generation Sequencing Assay for Detecting Clinically Relevant Levels of Breast Cancer-Related Single-Nucleotide Variants and Copy Number Variants Using Simulated Cell-Free DNA.
    Yang X; Chu Y; Zhang R; Han Y; Zhang L; Fu Y; Li D; Peng R; Li D; Ding J; Li Z; Zhao M; Zhang K; Lu T; Yi L; Wu Q; Lin G; Xie J; Liu T; Yang L; Yi X; Li J
    J Mol Diagn; 2017 Jul; 19(4):525-536. PubMed ID: 28502728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integration of Technical, Bioinformatic, and Variant Assessment Approaches in the Validation of a Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for Myeloid Malignancies.
    Thomas M; Sukhai MA; Zhang T; Dolatshahi R; Harbi D; Garg S; Misyura M; Pugh T; Stockley TL; Kamel-Reid S
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Jun; 141(6):759-775. PubMed ID: 28557600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Representing genetic variation with synthetic DNA standards.
    Deveson IW; Chen WY; Wong T; Hardwick SA; Andersen SB; Nielsen LK; Mattick JS; Mercer TR
    Nat Methods; 2016 Sep; 13(9):784-91. PubMed ID: 27502217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determining Performance Metrics for Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Panels Using Reference Materials.
    Cleveland MH; Zook JM; Salit M; Vallone PM
    J Mol Diagn; 2018 Sep; 20(5):583-590. PubMed ID: 29959024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the performance of selected variant callers using synthetic data and genome segmentation.
    Bian X; Zhu B; Wang M; Hu Y; Chen Q; Nguyen C; Hicks B; Meerzaman D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 19(1):429. PubMed ID: 30453880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and Characterization of Reference Materials for Genetic Testing: Focus on Public Partnerships.
    Kalman LV; Datta V; Williams M; Zook JM; Salit ML; Han JY
    Ann Lab Med; 2016 Nov; 36(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 27578503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison and evaluation of two exome capture kits and sequencing platforms for variant calling.
    Zhang G; Wang J; Yang J; Li W; Deng Y; Li J; Huang J; Hu S; Zhang B
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Aug; 16(1):581. PubMed ID: 26242175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.