These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28503007)

  • 21. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
    Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Discriminability and Perceptual Saliency of Temporal and Spectral Cues for Final Fricative Consonant Voicing in Simulated Cochlear-Implant and Bimodal Hearing.
    Kong YY; Winn MB; Poellmann K; Donaldson GS
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jun; 20():. PubMed ID: 27317666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Categorical Perception of Speech (VOT) and Analogous Non-Speech (FOT) signals: Behavioral and electrophysiological correlates.
    Horev N; Most T; Pratt H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):111-28. PubMed ID: 17204903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Functional benefits of continuous vs. categorical listening strategies on the neural encoding and perception of noise-degraded speech.
    Rizzi R; Bidelman GM
    bioRxiv; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38798410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Individual Talker and Token Covariation in the Production of Multiple Cues to Stop Voicing.
    Clayards M
    Phonetica; 2018; 75(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 28595176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automaticity in speech perception: some speech/nonspeech comparisons.
    Johnson K; Ralston JV
    Phonetica; 1994; 51(4):195-209. PubMed ID: 7938203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Identification of the relative onset time of a two-tone complex: auditory sensitivity or language based?
    Kishon-Rabin L; Rotshtein S; Taitelbaum R
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2000; 11(3):259-71. PubMed ID: 11041387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Auditory enhancement and second language experience in Spanish and English weighting of secondary voicing cues.
    Llanos F; Dmitrieva O; Shultz A; Francis AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2213-24. PubMed ID: 23967951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of Manipulating the Amplitude of Consonant Noise Portion on Subcortical Representation of Voice Onset Time and Voicing Perception in Stop Consonants.
    Tamura S; Ito K; Hirose N; Mori S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Feb; 62(2):434-441. PubMed ID: 30950688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Individual Differences in Categorization Gradience As Predicted by Online Processing of Phonetic Cues During Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence From Eye Movements.
    Ou J; Yu ACL; Xiang M
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Mar; 45(3):e12948. PubMed ID: 33682211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Categorization and discrimination of nonspeech sounds: differences between steady-state and rapidly-changing acoustic cues.
    Mirman D; Holt LL; McClelland JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1198-207. PubMed ID: 15376685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Differential cue weighting in perception and production of consonant voicing.
    Shultz AA; Francis AL; Llanos F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL95-101. PubMed ID: 22894322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sequential stream segregation of voiced and unvoiced speech sounds based on fundamental frequency.
    David M; Lavandier M; Grimault N; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():235-243. PubMed ID: 27923739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Precision of voicing perceptual identification is altered in association with voice-onset time production changes.
    Tamura S; Ito K; Hirose N; Mori S
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Sep; 237(9):2197-2204. PubMed ID: 31218370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Learning mechanisms in cue reweighting.
    Harmon Z; Idemaru K; Kapatsinski V
    Cognition; 2019 Aug; 189():76-88. PubMed ID: 30928780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL; DeSteno D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):544-52. PubMed ID: 12558290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A cross-linguistic examination of cortical auditory evoked potentials for a categorical voicing contrast.
    Elangovan S; Stuart A
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Feb; 490(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 21193015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speakers of tonal and non-tonal Korean dialects use different cue weightings in the perception of the three-way laryngeal stop contrast.
    Lee H; Politzer-Ahles S; Jongman A
    J Phon; 2013 Mar; 41(2):117-132. PubMed ID: 25301975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Effect of Habitual Speech Rate on Speaker-Specific Processing in English Stop Voicing Perception.
    Ting C; Kang Y
    Lang Speech; 2023 Aug; ():238309231188078. PubMed ID: 37555541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Listeners' attitudes toward accented talkers uniquely predicts accented speech perception.
    Ingvalson EM; Lansford KL; Federova V; Fernandez G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL234. PubMed ID: 28372098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.