307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28503833)
21. Making moral principles suit yourself.
Stanley ML; Henne P; Niemi L; Sinnott-Armstrong W; De Brigard F
Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Oct; 28(5):1735-1741. PubMed ID: 33948917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Neuroscience and Ethics.
Liao SM
Exp Psychol; 2017 Mar; 64(2):82-92. PubMed ID: 28497720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Egalitarianism and moral bioenhancement.
Sparrow R
Am J Bioeth; 2014; 14(4):20-8. PubMed ID: 24730485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [The contribution of neuroscience to the understanding of moral behavior].
Slachevsky A; Silva JR; Prenafeta ML; Novoa F
Rev Med Chil; 2009 Mar; 137(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 19621186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. What is neuroethics? Empirical and theoretical neuroethics.
Northoff G
Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 22(6):565-9. PubMed ID: 19809322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Toward Implementing the ADC Model of Moral Judgment in Autonomous Vehicles.
Dubljević V
Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Oct; 26(5):2461-2472. PubMed ID: 32632784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The ethical desirability of moral bioenhancement: a review of reasons.
Specker J; Focquaert F; Raus K; Sterckx S; Schermer M
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Sep; 15():67. PubMed ID: 25227512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Uncertain Facts or Uncertain Values? Testing the Distinction Between Empirical and Normative Uncertainty in Moral Judgments.
Theisen M; Germar M
Cogn Sci; 2024 Mar; 48(3):e13422. PubMed ID: 38482688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Deciphering moral intuition: How agents, deeds, and consequences influence moral judgment.
Dubljević V; Sattler S; Racine E
PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204631. PubMed ID: 30273370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sensitivity to shifts in probability of harm and benefit in moral dilemmas.
Ryazanov AA; Wang ST; Rickless SC; McKenzie CRM; Nelkin DK
Cognition; 2021 Apr; 209():104548. PubMed ID: 33640684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The rise of moral cognition.
Greene JD
Cognition; 2015 Feb; 135():39-42. PubMed ID: 25498900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The challenges of neuroethics.
Reichlin M
Funct Neurol; 2007; 22(4):235-42. PubMed ID: 18182130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Should we select for genetic moral enhancement? A thought experiment using the MoralKinder (MK+) haplotype.
Faust HS
Theor Med Bioeth; 2008; 29(6):397-416. PubMed ID: 19132548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Could Moral Enhancement Interventions be Medically Indicated?
Carter S
Health Care Anal; 2017 Dec; 25(4):338-353. PubMed ID: 26910729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Distributed Cognition and Distributed Morality: Agency, Artifacts and Systems.
Heersmink R
Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Apr; 23(2):431-448. PubMed ID: 27380187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach.
Conway P; Gawronski B
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):216-35. PubMed ID: 23276267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [On the necessity to distinguishing judgment from subjective choice in the cognitive neuroscience of morality].
Tassy S
Med Sci (Paris); 2011 Oct; 27(10):889-94. PubMed ID: 22027427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. From applied ethics to empirical ethics to contextual ethics.
Hoffmaster B
Bioethics; 2018 Feb; 32(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 29280167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. What does the modularity of morals have to do with ethics? Four moral sprouts plus or minus a few.
Flanagan O; Williams RA
Top Cogn Sci; 2010 Jul; 2(3):430-53. PubMed ID: 25163871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mortality salience and morality: thinking about death makes people less utilitarian.
Trémolière B; Neys WD; Bonnefon JF
Cognition; 2012 Sep; 124(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 22698994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
