BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28503833)

  • 61. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment.
    Greene JD; Sommerville RB; Nystrom LE; Darley JM; Cohen JD
    Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5537):2105-8. PubMed ID: 11557895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Association of natural sleep with moral utilitarianism: No evidence from 6 preregistered studies.
    Trémolière B; Gosling CJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Oct; 28(5):1726-1734. PubMed ID: 34027622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Stand up to action: The postural effect of moral dilemma decision-making and the moderating role of dual processes.
    Liu C; Liao J
    Psych J; 2021 Aug; 10(4):587-597. PubMed ID: 33882619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Wrongness in different relationships: Relational context effects on moral judgment.
    Simpson A; Laham SM; Fiske AP
    J Soc Psychol; 2016; 156(6):594-609. PubMed ID: 26751010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Neuroethics: Fostering Collaborations to Enable Neuroscientific Discovery.
    Farahany N; Ramos KM
    AJOB Neurosci; 2020; 11(3):148-154. PubMed ID: 32716745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. An empirically-derived taxonomy of moral concepts.
    Landy JF; Bartels DM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Nov; 147(11):1748-1761. PubMed ID: 29553766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Two Problematic Foundations of Neuroethics and Pragmatist Reconstructions.
    Racine E; Sample M
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2018 Oct; 27(4):566-577. PubMed ID: 30720412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The drunk utilitarian: blood alcohol concentration predicts utilitarian responses in moral dilemmas.
    Duke AA; Bègue L
    Cognition; 2015 Jan; 134():121-7. PubMed ID: 25460385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Discovering the Neural Nature of Moral Cognition? Empirical, Theoretical, and Practical Challenges in Bioethical Research with Electroencephalography (EEG).
    Wagner NF; Chaves P; Wolff A
    J Bioeth Inq; 2017 Jun; 14(2):299-313. PubMed ID: 28247203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Two Models of Moral Judgment.
    Bretz S; Sun R
    Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 42 Suppl 1():4-37. PubMed ID: 28685842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Moral learning: Psychological and philosophical perspectives.
    Cushman F; Kumar V; Railton P
    Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():1-10. PubMed ID: 28629599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Dimensions of Ethical Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnologies.
    Kreitmair KV
    AJOB Neurosci; 2019; 10(4):152-166. PubMed ID: 31642755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Can cognitive psychological research on reasoning enhance the discussion around moral judgments?
    Bialek M; Terbeck S
    Cogn Process; 2016 Aug; 17(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 27016146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: an empirical examination of the moral individual.
    Reynolds SJ; Ceranic TL
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1610-24. PubMed ID: 18020800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Moral foundations vignettes: a standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory.
    Clifford S; Iyengar V; Cabeza R; Sinnott-Armstrong W
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1178-1198. PubMed ID: 25582811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. The evolution of moral progress and biomedical moral enhancement.
    Persson I; Savulescu J
    Bioethics; 2019 Sep; 33(7):814-819. PubMed ID: 31107561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The new enhancement technologies and the place of vulnerability in our lives.
    Quilter JG
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2016 Feb; 37(1):9-27. PubMed ID: 26935438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Towards a systematic evaluation of moral bioenhancement.
    Kudlek K
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2022 Jun; 43(2-3):95-110. PubMed ID: 35871717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Why a Virtual Assistant for Moral Enhancement When We Could have a Socrates?
    Lara F
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Jun; 27(4):42. PubMed ID: 34189623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: a process dissociation analysis.
    Friesdorf R; Conway P; Gawronski B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 May; 41(5):696-713. PubMed ID: 25840987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.