BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

747 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28504021)

  • 1. The Theory of Dyadic Morality: Reinventing Moral Judgment by Redefining Harm.
    Schein C; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2018 Feb; 22(1):32-70. PubMed ID: 28504021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition: Automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering.
    Gray K; Schein C; Ward AF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Aug; 143(4):1600-15. PubMed ID: 24635184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Harm mediates the disgust-immorality link.
    Schein C; Ritter RS; Gray K
    Emotion; 2016 Sep; 16(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 27100369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Unifying Moral Dyad: Liberals and Conservatives Share the Same Harm-Based Moral Template.
    Schein C; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1147-63. PubMed ID: 26091912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The affective harm account (AHA) of moral judgment: Reconciling cognition and affect, dyadic morality and disgust, harm and purity.
    Gray K; MacCormack JK; Henry T; Banks E; Schein C; Armstrong-Carter E; Abrams S; Muscatell KA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Dec; 123(6):1199-1222. PubMed ID: 35357881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Moral Judgments of COVID-19 Social Distancing Violations: The Roles of Perceived Harm and Impurity.
    Rosenfeld DL; Tomiyama AJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2022 May; 48(5):766-781. PubMed ID: 34247528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deconstructing moral character judgments.
    Hartman R; Blakey W; Gray K
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Feb; 43():205-212. PubMed ID: 34418790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unfounded dumbfounding: How harm and purity undermine evidence for moral dumbfounding.
    Guglielmo S
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():334-337. PubMed ID: 28803616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A constructionist review of morality and emotions: no evidence for specific links between moral content and discrete emotions.
    Cameron CD; Lindquist KA; Gray K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2015 Nov; 19(4):371-94. PubMed ID: 25587050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward an integrated neuroscience of morality: the contribution of neuroeconomics to moral cognition.
    Kvaran T; Sanfey AG
    Top Cogn Sci; 2010 Jul; 2(3):579-95. PubMed ID: 25163877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Harm concerns predict moral judgments of suicide: comment on Rottman, Kelemen and Young (2014).
    Gray K
    Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):329-31. PubMed ID: 25023146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relevance of moral norms in distinct relational contexts: Purity versus harm norms regulate self-directed actions.
    Dungan JA; Chakroff A; Young L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173405. PubMed ID: 28278214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to think about emotion and morality: circles, not arrows.
    Gray K; Schein C; Cameron CD
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2017 Oct; 17():41-46. PubMed ID: 28950971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The sadistic trait predicts minimization of intention and causal responsibility in moral judgment.
    Trémolière B; Djeriouat H
    Cognition; 2016 Jan; 146():158-71. PubMed ID: 26414248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm.
    Cushman F; Young L; Hauser M
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1082-9. PubMed ID: 17201791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling Morality in 3-D: Decision-Making, Judgment, and Inference.
    Yu H; Siegel JZ; Crockett MJ
    Top Cogn Sci; 2019 Apr; 11(2):409-432. PubMed ID: 31042018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Problem of Purity in Moral Psychology.
    Gray K; DiMaggio N; Schein C; Kachanoff F
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2023 Aug; 27(3):272-308. PubMed ID: 36314693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mind Perception Is the Essence of Morality.
    Gray K; Young L; Waytz A
    Psychol Inq; 2012 Apr; 23(2):101-124. PubMed ID: 22754268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wrongness in different relationships: Relational context effects on moral judgment.
    Simpson A; Laham SM; Fiske AP
    J Soc Psychol; 2016; 156(6):594-609. PubMed ID: 26751010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making.
    Bartels DM
    Cognition; 2008 Aug; 108(2):381-417. PubMed ID: 18486121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.