These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28504525)

  • 1. Introspection of subjective feelings is sensitive and specific.
    Questienne L; van Dijck JP; Gevers W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28504525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metacognition and cognitive control: behavioural adaptation requires conflict experience.
    Questienne L; Van Opstal F; van Dijck JP; Gevers W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Feb; 71(2):411-423. PubMed ID: 27767382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objectifying the subjective: Building blocks of metacognitive experiences in conflict tasks.
    Questienne L; Atas A; Burle B; Gevers W
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Jan; 147(1):125-131. PubMed ID: 29154617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive control outside of conscious awareness.
    Linzarini A; Houdé O; Borst G
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Aug; 53():185-193. PubMed ID: 28684266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Introspective access to implicit shifts of attention.
    Reyes G; Sackur J
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Feb; 48():11-20. PubMed ID: 27810726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contextual within-trial adaptation of cognitive control: Evidence from the combination of conflict tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1505-32. PubMed ID: 27149295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unconscious conflict adaptation without feature-repetitions and response time carry-over.
    Huber-Huber C; Ansorge U
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):169-175. PubMed ID: 29431465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task conflict and proactive control: A computational theory of the Stroop task.
    Kalanthroff E; Davelaar EJ; Henik A; Goldfarb L; Usher M
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Jan; 125(1):59-82. PubMed ID: 29035077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Avoiding the conflict: Metacognitive awareness drives the selection of low-demand contexts.
    Desender K; Buc Calderon C; Van Opstal F; Van den Bussche E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1397-1410. PubMed ID: 28368164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Introspection during visual search.
    Reyes G; Sackur J
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Oct; 29():212-29. PubMed ID: 25286130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociation between reaction time and pupil dilation in the Stroop task.
    Hershman R; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 30816765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identifying stimuli that cue multiple responses triggers the congruency sequence effect independent of response conflict.
    Weissman DH; Colter KM; Grant LD; Bissett PG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):677-689. PubMed ID: 28095005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Introspective reports of reaction times in dual-tasks reflect experienced difficulty rather than timing of cognitive processes.
    Bryce D; Bratzke D
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Jul; 27():254-67. PubMed ID: 24956469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Control used and control felt: Two sides of the agency coin.
    Potts CA; Carlson RA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Oct; 81(7):2304-2319. PubMed ID: 31165456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effector system-specific sequential modulations of congruency effects.
    Janczyk M; Leuthold H
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1066-1072. PubMed ID: 28608004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The unique effects of relatively recent conflict on cognitive control.
    Colvett JS; Nobles LM; Bugg JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1344-1367. PubMed ID: 32744839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Emotion and goal-directed behavior: ERP evidence on cognitive and emotional conflict.
    Zinchenko A; Kanske P; Obermeier C; Schröger E; Kotz SA
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1577-87. PubMed ID: 25925271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.
    Fitzgerald LM; Arvaneh M; Dockree PM
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():264-277. PubMed ID: 28222381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Congruency sequence effect without feature integration and contingency learning.
    Kim S; Cho YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():60-8. PubMed ID: 24704781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pupillometric contributions to deciphering Stroop conflicts.
    Hershman R; Henik A
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):325-333. PubMed ID: 31396822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.