312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28504527)
1. The testing effect under divided attention.
Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Attention and the testing effect.
Mulligan NW; Picklesimer M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 26618913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Divided attention and the encoding effects of retrieval.
Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2474-2494. PubMed ID: 30975038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attention, the testing effect, and retrieval-induced forgetting: Distraction dissociates the positive and negative effects of retrieval on subsequent memory.
Mulligan NW; Buchin ZL; West JT
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Dec; 48(12):1905-1922. PubMed ID: 34726435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The testing effect under divided attention: Educational application.
Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Dec; 25(4):558-575. PubMed ID: 31070392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
Pyc MA; Rawson KA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
Carpenter SK
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19857026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval.
Thomas RC; McDaniel MA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):437-50. PubMed ID: 22732026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The testing effect in a social setting: Does retrieval practice benefit a listener?
Abel M; Roediger HL
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Sep; 24(3):347-359. PubMed ID: 29172560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
Halamish V; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.
Clarke AJ; Butler LT
Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Testing enhances both encoding and retrieval for both tested and untested items.
Cho KW; Neely JH; Crocco S; Vitrano D
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1211-1235. PubMed ID: 27049596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of divided attention on encoding processes under incidental and intentional learning instructions: underlying mechanisms?
Naveh-Benjamin M; Guez J; Hara Y; Brubaker MS; Lowenschuss-Erlich I
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1682-96. PubMed ID: 24283628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual task demands on encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from healthy adult ageing.
Logie RH; Della Sala S; MacPherson SE; Cooper J
Cortex; 2007 Jan; 43(1):159-69. PubMed ID: 17334215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of divided attention on global judgment of learning accuracy.
Barnes KA; Dougherty MR
Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 17892083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Elaborative retrieval: Do semantic mediators improve memory?
Lehman M; Karpicke JD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1573-1591. PubMed ID: 26974674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.
Anderson ND; Craik FI; Naveh-Benjamin M
Psychol Aging; 1998 Sep; 13(3):405-23. PubMed ID: 9793117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Divided attention and memory: evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding.
Fernandes MA; Moscovitch M
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2000 Jun; 129(2):155-76. PubMed ID: 10868332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Memory networks supporting retrieval effort and retrieval success under conditions of full and divided attention.
Skinner EI; Fernandes MA; Grady CL
Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(6):386-96. PubMed ID: 19502200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing the testing effect under blocked and mixed practice: The mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice are not affected by practice format.
Abel M; Roediger HL
Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 27464491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
