These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28504530)

  • 21. Do judgments of learning predict automatic influences of memory?
    Undorf M; Böhm S; Cüpper L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):882-96. PubMed ID: 26595068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study.
    Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intensifying the intensity illusion in judgments of learning: Modality and cue combinations.
    Peynircioğlu ZF; Tatz JR
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Apr; 47(3):412-419. PubMed ID: 30411221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Why is knowledge updating after task experience incomplete? Contributions of encoding experience, scaling artifact, and inferential deficit.
    Mueller ML; Dunlosky J; Tauber SK
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Feb; 43(2):180-92. PubMed ID: 25326151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recollection-based prospective metamemory judgments are more accurate than those based on confidence: judgments of remembering and knowing (JORKS).
    McCabe DP; Soderstrom NC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):605-21. PubMed ID: 21707208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The relatedness effect on judgments of learning: A closer look at the contribution of processing fluency.
    Undorf M; Erdfelder E
    Mem Cognit; 2015 May; 43(4):647-58. PubMed ID: 25388520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Do judgments of learning modify older adults' actual learning?
    Tauber SK; Witherby AE
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Sep; 34(6):836-847. PubMed ID: 31259565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Judgments of learning do not reduce to memory encoding operations: event-related potential evidence for distinct metacognitive processes.
    Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():87-95. PubMed ID: 19968975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How influenceable is our metamemory for pictorial material? The impact of framing and emotionality on metamemory judgments.
    Schmoeger M; Deckert M; Loos E; Willinger U
    Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104112. PubMed ID: 31759319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How Much Do Metamemory Beliefs Contribute to the Font-Size Effect in Judgments of Learning?
    Hu X; Li T; Zheng J; Su N; Liu Z; Luo L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142351. PubMed ID: 26556478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Judgments of learning reflect encoding fluency: conclusive evidence for the ease-of-processing hypothesis.
    Undorf M; Erdfelder E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1264-9. PubMed ID: 21574748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Metamemory viewed through the judgment lens.
    Bröder A; Undorf M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():153-165. PubMed ID: 31158737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The contributions of anchoring and past-test performance to the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
    England BD; Serra MJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):715-22. PubMed ID: 22477335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
    Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate?
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):886-97. PubMed ID: 24643790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of emotional valence and font size on metacognition and memory.
    Agadzhanyan K; Castel AD
    Memory; 2024 Feb; 32(2):252-263. PubMed ID: 38289343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test.
    Myers SJ; Rhodes MG; Hausman HE
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):745-758. PubMed ID: 32124334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using the past to predict the future.
    Dougherty MR; Scheck P; Nelson TO; Narens L
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1096-115. PubMed ID: 16496729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Metamemory and Memory Discrepancies in Directed Forgetting of Emotional Information.
    Çapan D; Ikier S
    Eur J Psychol; 2021 Feb; 17(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 33737973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Are we aware of our ability to forget? Metacognitive predictions of directed forgetting.
    Friedman MC; Castel AD
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Nov; 39(8):1448-56. PubMed ID: 21638106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.