These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28504536)
1. A signal-detection analysis of eyewitness identification across the adult lifespan. Colloff MF; Wade KA; Wixted JT; Maylor EA Psychol Aging; 2017 May; 32(3):243-258. PubMed ID: 28504536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unfair Lineups Make Witnesses More Likely to Confuse Innocent and Guilty Suspects. Colloff MF; Wade KA; Strange D Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1227-39. PubMed ID: 27458070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts. Colloff MF; Wixted JT J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Eyewitness identification across the life span: A meta-analysis of age differences. Fitzgerald RJ; Price HL Psychol Bull; 2015 Nov; 141(6):1228-65. PubMed ID: 26011788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models. Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM; Cataldo AM Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 May; 5(1):21. PubMed ID: 32405927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis. Wixted JT; Wells GL Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2017 May; 18(1):10-65. PubMed ID: 28395650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects. Jones JM; Katzman J; Kovera MB Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1233782. PubMed ID: 38680285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments. Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model. Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. fullROC: An R package for generating and analyzing eyewitness-lineup ROC curves. Yang Y; Smith AM Behav Res Methods; 2023 Apr; 55(3):1259-1274. PubMed ID: 35641680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups. Lee J; Penrod SD Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup. Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Suspect filler similarity in eyewitness lineups: a literature review and a novel methodology. Fitzgerald RJ; Oriet C; Price HL Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 24955851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identifying the bad guy in a lineup using confidence judgments under deadline pressure. Brewer N; Weber N; Wootton D; Lindsay DS Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1208-14. PubMed ID: 22933457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pre-identification confidence is related to eyewitness lineup identification accuracy across heterogeneous encoding conditions. Molinaro PF; Charman SD; Wylie K Law Hum Behav; 2021 Dec; 45(6):524-541. PubMed ID: 34661424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Probative value of absolute and relative judgments in eyewitness identification. Clark SE; Erickson MA; Breneman J Law Hum Behav; 2011 Oct; 35(5):364-80. PubMed ID: 20953683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distinguishing Between Investigator Discriminability and Eyewitness Discriminability: A Method for Creating Full Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves of Lineup Identification Performance. Smith AM; Yang Y; Wells GL Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 May; 15(3):589-607. PubMed ID: 32375014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups. Mickes L; Flowe HD; Wixted JT J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):361-76. PubMed ID: 23294282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]