These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28504536)
21. A perceptual scaling approach to eyewitness identification. Gepshtein S; Wang Y; He F; Diep D; Albright TD Nat Commun; 2020 Jul; 11(1):3380. PubMed ID: 32665586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Backloading in the sequential lineup prevents within-lineup criterion shifts that undermine eyewitness identification performance. Horry R; Palmer MA; Brewer N J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):346-60. PubMed ID: 22924858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups. Wright DB Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Optimizing the selection of fillers in police lineups. Colloff MF; Wilson BM; Seale-Carlisle TM; Wixted JT Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33593908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage. Carlson CA; Gronlund SD; Clark SE J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Jun; 14(2):118-128. PubMed ID: 18590368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Police lineups of the future? Brewer N; Weber N; Guerin N Am Psychol; 2020 Jan; 75(1):76-91. PubMed ID: 30998024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predictors of eyewitness identification decisions from video lineups in England: a field study. Horry R; Memon A; Wright DB; Milne R Law Hum Behav; 2012 Aug; 36(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 22849411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Holistic Facial Composite Construction and Subsequent Lineup Identification Accuracy: Comparing Adults and Children. Davis JP; Thorniley S; Gibson S; Solomon C J Psychol; 2016; 150(1):102-18. PubMed ID: 25705795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure. Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The reveal procedure: A way to enhance evidence of innocence from police lineups. Yilmaz AS; Lebensfeld TC; Wilson BM Law Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 46(2):164-173. PubMed ID: 35084905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fair lineups are better than biased lineups and showups, but not because they increase underlying discriminability. Smith AM; Wells GL; Lindsay RC; Penrod SD Law Hum Behav; 2017 Apr; 41(2):127-145. PubMed ID: 27685645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Modeling face similarity in police lineups. Shen KJ; Colloff MF; Vul E; Wilson BM; Wixted JT Psychol Rev; 2023 Mar; 130(2):432-461. PubMed ID: 36548056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A signal-detection-based diagnostic-feature-detection model of eyewitness identification. Wixted JT; Mickes L Psychol Rev; 2014 Apr; 121(2):262-76. PubMed ID: 24730600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The role of estimator variables in eyewitness identification. Semmler C; Dunn J; Mickes L; Wixted JT J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Sep; 24(3):400-415. PubMed ID: 29389161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Using machine learning analyses to explore relations between eyewitness lineup looking behaviors and suspect guilt. Price HL; Bruer KC; Adkins MC Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):223-237. PubMed ID: 32105097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: people are better with their own age. Wright DB; Stroud JN Law Hum Behav; 2002 Dec; 26(6):641-54. PubMed ID: 12508699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]