114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28504930)
21. Multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring in extreme lateral interbody fusion. Transcranial electrical stimulation as indispensable rearview.
Berends HI; Journée HL; Rácz I; van Loon J; Härtl R; Spruit M
Eur Spine J; 2016 May; 25(5):1581-1586. PubMed ID: 26310841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Localisation and preservation of the autonomic nerves in rectal cancer surgery - technical details.
Grama FA; Burcoş T; Bordea A; Cristian D
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2014; 109(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 24956344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. External anal sphincter responses after S3 spinal root surface electrical stimulation.
Pelliccioni G; Scarpino O
Neurourol Urodyn; 2006; 25(7):788-91. PubMed ID: 16941641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Electrophysiological monitoring and identification of neural roots during somatic-autonomic reflex pathway procedure for neurogenic bladder.
Dai CF; Xiao CG
Chin J Traumatol; 2005 Apr; 8(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 15769303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Is intraoperative neuromonitoring associated with better functional outcome in patients undergoing open TME? Results of a case-control study.
Kneist W; Kauff DW; Juhre V; Hoffmann KP; Lang H
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Sep; 39(9):994-9. PubMed ID: 23810330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Surface Electromyography Reliably Records Electrophysiologically Evoked Internal Anal Sphincter Activity: A More Minimally Invasive Approach for Monitoring Extrinsic Innervation.
Kauff DW; Wachter N; Heimann A; Krüger TB; Hoffmann KP; Lang H; Kneist W
Eur Surg Res; 2016; 57(1-2):81-8. PubMed ID: 27115765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reduction of bladder outlet resistance by selective stimulation of the ventral sacral root using high frequency blockade: a chronic study in spinal cord transected dogs.
Abdel-Gawad M; Boyer S; Sawan M; Elhilali MM
J Urol; 2001 Aug; 166(2):728-33. PubMed ID: 11458125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sacral root stimulation for controlled defecation.
Shafik A
Eur Surg Res; 1995; 27(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 7890007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intraoperative identification and neurophysiologic parameters to verify pelvic autonomic nerve function during total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Kneist W; Heintz A; Junginger T
J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Jan; 198(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 14698312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Heuristic map of myotomal innervation in humans using direct intraoperative nerve root stimulation.
Schirmer CM; Shils JL; Arle JE; Cosgrove GR; Dempsey PK; Tarlov E; Kim S; Martin CJ; Feltz C; Moul M; Magge S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jul; 15(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 21476796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Rectal volume tolerability and anal pressures in patients with fecal incontinence treated with sacral nerve stimulation.
Michelsen HB; Buntzen S; Krogh K; Laurberg S
Dis Colon Rectum; 2006 Jul; 49(7):1039-44. PubMed ID: 16721520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Functional variability of sacral roots in bladder control.
Carlucci L; Wavasseur T; Bénard A; Sesay M; Delleci C; Goossens D; Vignes JR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):961-5. PubMed ID: 25325171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer with emphasis on pelvic autonomic nerve preservation: Expert technical tips for robotic surgery.
Kim NK; Kim YW; Cho MS
Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 26141555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Total mesorectal excision for cancer: histological and immunohistochemical evidence of nerve removal and risk-factor analysis.
Moszkowicz D; Rougier G; Julié C; Nyangoh Timoh K; Beauchet A; Vychnevskaia K; Malafosse R; Nordlinger B; Peschaud F
Colorectal Dis; 2016 Oct; 18(10):O367-O375. PubMed ID: 27591734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Latency of compound muscle action potentials of the anal sphincter after magnetic sacral stimulation.
Morren GL; Walter S; Lindehammar H; Hallböök O; Sjödahl R
Muscle Nerve; 2001 Sep; 24(9):1232-5. PubMed ID: 11494279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Urinary bladder and sphincter responses to stimulation of dorsal and ventral sacral roots.
Schmidt RA; Bruschini H; Tanagho EA
Invest Urol; 1979 Jan; 16(4):300-4. PubMed ID: 429125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Design of sEMG assembly to detect external anal sphincter activity: a proof of concept.
Shiraz A; Leaker B; Mosse CA; Solomon E; Craggs M; Demosthenous A
Physiol Meas; 2017 Oct; 38(11):L17-L27. PubMed ID: 28901946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Treatment of insufficiency of the anal sphincter by sacral spinal nerve stimulation with implantable neurostimulators].
Matzel KE; Stadelmaier U; Hohenfellner M; Hohenberger W
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1998; 115():494-7. PubMed ID: 9931666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Below the belt: sensory mapping and monitoring in the sacral-pudendal region.
Eccher MA
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Aug; 31(4):323-5. PubMed ID: 25083843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]