283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28504996)
1. Stroke Volume Variation and Pulse Pressure Variation Are Not Useful for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Thoracic Surgery.
Jeong DM; Ahn HJ; Park HW; Yang M; Kim JA; Park J
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1158-1165. PubMed ID: 28504996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic preload indicators fail to predict fluid responsiveness in open-chest conditions.
de Waal EE; Rex S; Kruitwagen CL; Kalkman CJ; Buhre WF
Crit Care Med; 2009 Feb; 37(2):510-5. PubMed ID: 19114886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation.
Jun JH; Chung RK; Baik HJ; Chung MH; Hyeon JS; Lee YG; Park SH
BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):142. PubMed ID: 31390982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of fluid responsiveness by dynamic preload parameters in children undergoing thoracoscopic surgery with one-lung ventilation - A prospective observational study.
Xie S; Han D; Chen G; Pan S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Dec; 101(49):e31795. PubMed ID: 36626414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hemodynamic Changes via the Lung Recruitment Maneuver Can Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Stroke Volume and Arterial Pressure During One-Lung Ventilation.
Kimura A; Suehiro K; Juri T; Fujimoto Y; Yoshida H; Tanaka K; Mori T; Nishikawa K
Anesth Analg; 2021 Jul; 133(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 33687175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tidal volume challenge to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room: An observational study.
Messina A; Montagnini C; Cammarota G; De Rosa S; Giuliani F; Muratore L; Della Corte F; Navalesi P; Cecconi M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 36(8):583-591. PubMed ID: 31021879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac and thoracic surgery.
Piccioni F; Bernasconi F; Tramontano GTA; Langer M
J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):677-684. PubMed ID: 27306799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of an automated respiratory systolic variation test with dynamic preload indicators to predict fluid responsiveness after major surgery.
Trepte CJ; Eichhorn V; Haas SA; Stahl K; Schmid F; Nitzschke R; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
Br J Anaesth; 2013 Nov; 111(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 23811425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volume variation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation.
Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 21946822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Noninvasive pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness at multiple thresholds: a prospective observational study.
Vos JJ; Poterman M; Salm PP; Van Amsterdam K; Struys MM; Scheeren TW; Kalmar AF
Can J Anaesth; 2015 Nov; 62(11):1153-60. PubMed ID: 26335905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing one-lung ventilation.
Jun IJ; Chung MH; Kim JE; Lee HS; Son JM; Choi EM
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(12):2589-2598. PubMed ID: 34104090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor.
Stens J; Oeben J; Van Dusseldorp AA; Boer C
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26318314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Hofer CK; Müller SM; Furrer L; Klaghofer R; Genoni M; Zollinger A
Chest; 2005 Aug; 128(2):848-54. PubMed ID: 16100177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of fluid responsiveness using dynamic preload indices in patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery with pneumoperitoneum in the Trendelenburg position.
Chin JH; Lee EH; Hwang GS; Choi WJ
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2013 Jul; 41(4):515-22. PubMed ID: 23808512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting stroke volume and arterial pressure fluid responsiveness in liver cirrhosis patients using dynamic preload variables: A prospective study of diagnostic accuracy.
Wu CY; Cheng YJ; Liu YJ; Wu TT; Chien CT; Chan KC;
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2016 Sep; 33(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 27167058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive values of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with pneumoperitoneum.
Zlicar M; Novak-Jankovic V; Blagus R; Cecconi M
J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Oct; 32(5):825-832. PubMed ID: 29149433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with thoracic kyphosis.
Chen Y; Guo X; Fu J; Dong T; Liu X; Lv H
Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Jul; 10(7):7571-7578. PubMed ID: 34154341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation study of the dynamic parameters of pulse wave in pulmonary resection surgery.
Miñana A; Parra MJ; Carbonell J; Soro M; Belda J; Ferrando C
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed); 2020 Feb; 67(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 31889529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stroke volume variation fail to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy with one-lung ventilation using thoracotomy.
Fu Q; Zhao F; Mi W; Zhang H
Biosci Trends; 2014 Feb; 8(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 24647114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
