These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28505289)

  • 1. Financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use anaesthetic equipment.
    McGain F; Story D; Lim T; McAlister S
    Br J Anaesth; 2017 Jun; 118(6):862-869. PubMed ID: 28505289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A life cycle assessment of reusable and single-use central venous catheter insertion kits.
    McGain F; McAlister S; McGavin A; Story D
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1073-80. PubMed ID: 22492185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Life Cycle Assessment and Costing Methods for Device Procurement: Comparing Reusable and Single-Use Disposable Laryngoscopes.
    Sherman JD; Raibley LA; Eckelman MJ
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Aug; 127(2):434-443. PubMed ID: 29324492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways.
    Eckelman M; Mosher M; Gonzalez A; Sherman J
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1067-72. PubMed ID: 22492190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of reusable and disposable perioperative textiles: sustainability state-of-the-art 2012.
    Overcash M
    Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1055-66. PubMed ID: 22492184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use plastic anaesthetic drug trays.
    McGain F; McAlister S; McGavin A; Story D
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2010 May; 38(3):538-44. PubMed ID: 20514965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Prioritized utilisation and reprocessing of reusable equipment in anaesthesiology deparmtents : Recommendations on how to reduce CO
    Richter H; Schulz-Stübner S; Pecher S; Orlowski S; Coburn M; Schuster M
    Anaesthesiologie; 2023 Jun; 72(6):433-444. PubMed ID: 36930267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
    Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
    BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does Reusable Instrumentation for Four-Anchor Rotator Cuff Repair Offer Decreased Waste Disposal Costs and Lower Waste-Related Carbon Emissions?
    Pearson Z; Hung V; Agarwal A; Stehlik K; Harris A; Ahiarakwe U; Best MJ
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2024 Aug; 32(15):705-711. PubMed ID: 38861714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ["Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study"].
    Engert K
    Zentralbl Chir; 1995; 120(5):416. PubMed ID: 7610732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact on carbon footprint: a life cycle assessment of disposable versus reusable sharps containers in a large US hospital.
    Grimmond T; Reiner S
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Jun; 30(6):639-42. PubMed ID: 22627643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can a simple 'cost-awareness' campaign for laparoscopic hysterectomy change the use and costs of disposable surgical supplies? Pre-post non-controlled study.
    Ross S; Lier D; Mackinnon G; Bentz C; Rakowski G; Capstick VA
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e027099. PubMed ID: 31831528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of costs for reusable and disposable syringes.
    Yimyam S; Srisuphan W; Plianpadung S; Senaratana W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jul; 78 Suppl 1():S26-8. PubMed ID: 7666023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the true costs of disposable and reusable instruments.
    Mancuso R; Bickham MJ
    AORN J; 1995 Jul; 62(1):39-42, 45, 47-8. PubMed ID: 7574563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Cost and Waste-Savings Comparison Between Single-Use and Reusable Pulse Oximetry Sensors Across US Operating Rooms.
    Stockert EW; Carvalho B; Sun EC
    Anesth Analg; 2024 Jul; 139(1):220-225. PubMed ID: 38195082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cost comparison of disposable vs reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Demoulin L; Kesteloot K; Penninckx F
    Surg Endosc; 1996 May; 10(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 8658331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
    Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
    J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Costs of reusable and disposable aprons in a public teaching hospital].
    Pissinati Pde S; Haddad Mdo C; Rossaneis MÂ; Gil RB; Belei RA
    Rev Esc Enferm USP; 2014 Oct; 48(5):915-21. PubMed ID: 25493497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Apelgren KN; Blank ML; Slomski CA; Hadjis NS
    Surg Endosc; 1994 Jan; 8(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 8153862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety.
    Siu J; Hill AG; MacCormick AD
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Jan; 87(1-2):28-33. PubMed ID: 27878921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.